journal article·2025-05-17Open access

Comparative Evaluation of Feed-Forward Neural Networks for Predicting Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Seybaplaya Carbonate Rock Cores

Jose W. Naal-Pech, Leonardo Palemón-Arcos, Youness El Hamzaoui

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 10

Abstract

Accurate estimation of the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of carbonate rocks underpins safe design and stability assessment in karst-influenced geotechnical projects. This work presents a comprehensive evaluation of four feed-forward artificial neural network (ANN) architectures—radial basis function (RBF), Bayesian regularized (BR), scaled conjugate gradient (SCG), and Levenberg–Marquardt (LM)—to predict UCS from three readily measured variables: water content, interconnected porosity, and real density. Fifty core specimens from the Seybaplaya quarry in Campeche, Mexico, were split into training and testing subsets under uniform preprocessing. Each model’s predictive performance was assessed over 30 independent runs using mean absolute error, root mean squared error, and coefficient of determination, with statistical differences tested via nonparametric hypothesis testing. The RBF network achieved the highest median R2 and significantly outperformed the other variants, while the BR model demonstrated robust generalization. SCG and LM converged faster and efficiently but with slightly lower accuracy. Sensitivity analysis identified interconnected porosity as the primary predictor of UCS. These results establish RBF-based ANNs with appropriate regularization and feature importance assessment as a novel, practical, and reliable framework for UCS prediction in heterogeneous carbonate formations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Drilling and Well Engineering · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Mineral Processing and Grinding

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Engineering College, Carmen Autonomous University, Campus III, Avenida Central S/N, Esq. con Fracc. Mundo Maya, Carmen City C.P. 24115, Campeche, Mexico

Funding

Universidad Autónoma del Carmen (UNACAR), Ciudad del Carmen, Campeche, Mexico

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Effects of Water Content on the Mechanical Behavior of Sedimentary Rocks
2. The Lower and Middle Buntsandstein of Southwest Thuringia in Its Geotechnical Properties
3. Estimation of Coal Measures Rock Strength Using Sonic and Density Logs
4. Nonlinear Relationships between Water Saturation and Unconfined Compressive Strength in Limestones
5. A Comparative Study of Neural Network and Multiple Regression Analysis in Modeling Rock Properties
6. Bieniawski, Z.T. (1975). Engineering Rock Mass Classifications: A Complete Manual for Engineers and Geologists in Mining, Civil, and Petroleum Engineering, Wiley.
7. (2010). Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength and Elastic Moduli of Intact Rock Core Specimens Under Varying States of Stress and Temperatures (Standard No. ASTM D7012-10).
8. Influence of Porosity and Density on the Compressive Strength of Seybaplaya Bank Rocks
9. Porosity and Compressive Strength Relationships in Carbonates
10. Naal-Pech, A. (2024, January 22–27). Extended Correlations for UCS Prediction in Karstic Limestones. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress on Rock Mechanics, New Delhi, India.
11. Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength Using Artificial Neural Networks
12. Study of the Relationship between Uniaxial Compressive Strength vs. Non-Destructive Testing and Specific Weight in Bank Rocks from the Seybaplaya Campeche Mexico
13. Correlations of Compressive Strength (MPa) with Rock Physical Properties
14. A Neural Network Application to Estimate the Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Some Rocks from Their Petrographic Characteristics
15. Shale Mechanical Properties and Crack Propagation
16. Empirical Relationships between Compressive Strength and Porosity in Gulf of Mexico Rocks
17. Study of the Relationship between Uniaxial Compressive Strength and the Point Load Test in Rocks from the Bank in Seybaplaya Campeche Mexico
18. Wei, X., Shahani, N.M., and Zheng, X. (2023). Predictive Modeling of the Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Rocks Using an Artificial Neural Network Approach. Mathematics, 11.10.3390/math11071650 ↗
19. Application of Artificial Neural Networks and Multivariate Statistics to Predict UCS and E Using Physical Properties of Asmari Limestones10.1007/s12517-014-1331-0 ↗
20. Artificial Neural Networks and Nonlinear Regression Techniques to Assess the Influence of Slake Durability Cycles on the Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength and Modulus of Elasticity for Carbonate Rocks10.1002/nag.1066 ↗
21. Setayeshirad, M.R., Uromeie, A., and Nikudel, M.R. (2025). Modeling of the Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Carbonate Rocks Using Statistical Analysis and Artificial Neural Network. Rock Mech. Rock Eng.10.1007/s00603-025-04441-8 ↗
22. Prediction of Unconfined Compressive Strength of Carbonate Rocks Using Artificial Neural Networks10.1007/s12665-012-1783-z ↗
23. Application of the ANFIS Approach for Estimating the Mechanical Properties of Sandstones
24. Determination of Strength and Modulus of Elasticity of Heterogeneous Sedimentary Rocks: An ANFIS Predictive Technique10.1016/j.measurement.2018.05.064 ↗
25. Some Applications of Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) in Geotechnical Engineering10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.09.008 ↗
26. Prediction of the Unconfined Compressive Strength of Soft Rocks: A PSO-Based ANN Approach10.1007/s10064-014-0638-0 ↗
27. A Reliable PSO-Based ANN Approach for Predicting Unconfined Compressive Strength of Sandstones10.2174/1874836802014010237 ↗
28. Prediction of Unconfined Compressive Strength and Modulus of Elasticity for Travertine Samples Using Regression and Artificial Neural Networks
29. Prediction of the Unconfined Compressive Strength of Compacted Granular Soils by Using Inference Systems10.1007/s00254-008-1645-x ↗
30. Prediction of Compressive and Tensile Strength of Limestone via Genetic Programming10.1016/j.eswa.2007.06.006 ↗
31. A Hybrid Modelling Approach for Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Rock Materials10.5802/crmeca.17 ↗
32. A Fuzzy Model to Predict the Uniaxial Compressive Strength and the Modulus of Elasticity of a Problematic Rock10.1016/j.engappai.2003.11.006 ↗
33. Estimation of Intact Rock Uniaxial Compressive Strength Using Advanced Machine Learning10.1007/s40515-023-00357-4 ↗
34. Advanced Machine Learning Approaches for Uniaxial Compressive Strength Prediction of Indian Rocks Using Petrographic Properties10.1007/s41939-024-00513-4 ↗
35. Kochukrishnan, S., Krishnamurthy, P., Yuvarajan, D., and Kaliappan, N. (2024). Comprehensive Study on the Python-Based Regression Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Uniaxial Compressive Strength Using Multiple Parameters in Charnockite Rocks. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-58001-1 ↗
36. Servicio Geológico Mexicano (2021). Implementing the 1992 Mining Law: Analysis of Mineral Substances and Administration of Concessions, Servicio Geológico Mexicano.
37. (2012). Standard Practices for Preparing Rock Core as Cylindrical Test Specimens and Verifying Conformance to Dimensional and Shape Tolerances (Standard No. ASTM D4543-12).
38. (2023). Standard Test Methods for Compressive Strength and Elastic Moduli of Intact Rock Core Specimens under Varying States of Stress and Temperatures (Standard No. ASTM D7012-23).
39. (2010). Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and Rock by Mass (Standard No. ASTM D2216-10).
40. (2023). Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by the Water Displacement Method (Standard No. ASTM D854-23).
41. (2018). Standard Test Method for Determination of Pore Volume and Pore Volume Distribution of Soil and Rock by Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry (Standard No. ASTM D4404-18).
42. Nieto, G.C., and Avendaño, D.P. (2015). Laboratory Guide for Material Strength Testing, Inimagdalena.
43. Study of the Relationship between Uniaxial Compressive Strength, Water Content, Porosity and Density in Bank Rocks in Seybaplaya Campeche
44. Fast Learning in Networks of Locally-Tuned Processing Units10.1162/neco.1989.1.2.281 ↗
45. Bayesian Interpolation10.1162/neco.1992.4.3.415 ↗
46. A Scaled Conjugate Gradient Algorithm for Fast Supervised Learning10.1016/S0893-6080(05)80056-5 ↗
47. Training Feedforward Networks with the Marquardt Algorithm10.1109/72.329697 ↗
48. Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) Models in Simulating Polygalacturonase Production10.15376/biores.11.4.8676-8685 ↗
49. Evaluation of ANN and ANFIS Modeling Ability in the Prediction of AISI 1050 Steel Machining Performance10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06136 ↗
50. Forecasting with Artificial Neural Networks: The State of the Art10.1016/S0169-2070(97)00044-7 ↗
51. Optimisation and Performance Evaluation of Response Surface Methodology (RSM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) in the Prediction of Biogas Production from Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME)10.1016/j.energy.2022.126449 ↗
52. Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines
53. Use of Some Sensitivity Criteria for Choosing Networks with Good Generalization Ability10.1007/BF02309007 ↗