journal article·2025-05-10Open access

The Effect of a Mathematics Learning Disability Program Offered Face to Face with Interactive Online Learning from Smart Learning Environments on Teachers’ Knowledge and Self-Efficacy Levels

Necmi Sağıroğlu, Hüseyin Uzunboylu, Gönül Akçamete, Mukaddes Sakallı Demirok

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 10

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of in-service training programs aimed at enhancing teachers’ knowledge and self-efficacy in the context of learning disabilities (LD) in mathematics. Despite the increasing use of both interactive online learning and face-to-face training methods in professional development, limited research has compared their relative effectiveness in this specific field. Furthermore, existing studies have not adequately addressed whether improvements in teachers’ knowledge and self-efficacy are sustained over time. To address this gap, the present study employed a quasi-experimental design with two experimental groups. The sample consists of 80 classroom teachers, with 40 participants in the interactive online learning education group and 40 in the face-to-face education group. The training program consists of 16 h of instruction over four weeks. Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire and the Mathematics Learning Difficulty Area Teacher Self-Efficacy Scale, and statistical analyses were conducted. The findings indicate that, prior to the intervention, teachers in the interactive online learning education group exhibited significantly higher levels of knowledge and self-efficacy. However, the post-intervention results revealed no statistically significant differences between the two groups. Cohen’s d analysis indicated a moderate effect size for interactive online learning education before the intervention, which diminished to a small effect size afterward. This study validates the efficiency of interactive online learning from smart learning environments for in-service training programs aimed at enhancing teachers’ knowledge and self-efficacy about learning disabilities in mathematics. These results suggest that both training modalities effectively improve teachers’ knowledge and self-efficacy, but neither demonstrate a clear long-term advantage. This study underscores the need for further research to determine optimal strategies for sustaining professional development in this domain.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: E-Learning and COVID-19 · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Special Education, Near East University, North Cyprus 99300, Turkey

Deoartment of Special Education, Kyrenia, University of Kyrenia, North Cyprus 99320, Turkey

Department of Primary School Education, Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. New examination approach for real world creativity and problem-solving skills in mathematics10.3390/higheredu2030028 ↗
2. The effect of motivation and self-efficacy against mathematics learning achievement in hybrid learning10.18844/wjet.v14i6.7795 ↗
3. Articulate (2025, May 05). Interactive E-Learning. Available online: https://www.articulate.com/glossary/interactive-e-learning/.
4. The relationship between self-regulation learning and online learning adoption10.18844/cjes.v17i6.7550 ↗
5. Towards smart education through internet of things: A survey
6. Evaluating students’ experiences in self-regulated smart learning environment10.1007/s10639-022-11126-0 ↗
7. Major benefits of using smart technologies in education. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University
8. The role of digital technologies in education: Benefits and challenges
9. Albarqı, M.N. (2024). Exploring the effectiveness of technology-assisted interventions for promoting independence in elderly patients: A systematic review. Healthcare, 12.10.3390/healthcare12212105 ↗
10. What influences student situational engagement in smart classrooms: Perception of the learning environment and students’ motivation10.1111/bjet.13204 ↗
11. Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students’ engagement10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4 ↗
12. Teacher beliefs, classroom process quality, and student engagement in the smart classroom learning environment: A multilevel analysis10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104501 ↗
13. Facilitating learning for students with special needs: A review of technology-supported special education studies10.1007/s40692-019-00150-8 ↗
14. Adaptive e-learning platforms can improve student performance and engagement in dental education10.1002/jdd.12609 ↗
15. Review on self-regulated learning in smart learning environment10.1186/s40561-021-00157-8 ↗
16. The problem-based approach in mathematics teaching and its impact on mathematical problem-solving performance10.18844/ijlt.v16i4.9519 ↗
17. Dowker, A. (2024). Developmental dyscalculia in relation to individual differences in mathematics abilities. Children, 11.10.3390/children11060623 ↗
18. Does disability matter in mathematics educational research? A critical comparison of research on students with and without disabilities10.1007/s13394-019-00299-6 ↗
19. Yıldırım-Doğru, S. (2015). Mathematics learning difficulties. Learning Difficulties, Educational Book.
20. Bird, R. (2021). The Dyscalculia Toolkit: Supporting Learning Difficulties in Mathematics, Sage Publications.
21. Sarı, H. (2016). Individuals with Learning Disabilities and Their Education, Nobel Academic Publishing. [6th ed.].
22. A new model proposal for diagnosing mathematics learning difficulties: Multiple filter model
23. Silverman, L.K. (2002). Upside Down Brilliance, DeLeon Publishing.
24. Mathematics learning difficulties (dyscalculia) from the perspective of classroom teachers
25. Individual differences in mathematics cognition: A Bert’s eye view10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101175 ↗
26. Professional Development of Mathematics Teacher: A Systematic Literature Review
27. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, Macmillan.
28. Do teachers’ perception of teaching competence and self-efficacy affect students’ academic outcomes? A closer look at student-reported classroom processes and outcomes10.1080/00461520.2021.1991355 ↗
29. Promotion elementary school students’ autonomous reading motivation: Effects of a teacher professional development workshop10.1080/00220671.2014.942032 ↗
30. Remote teaching of multidigit multiplication for students with learning disabilities10.1177/07319487221103838 ↗
31. A web-based learning acceptance model for children with learning disabilities
32. Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: Teacher education and teaching competence effects among early career teachers in Germany10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650 ↗
33. Culturally responsive self-efficacy of mathematics teachers: Input for self-efficacy building enhancement10.18844/ijire.v9i1.8975 ↗
34. Kaçar, E. (2017). Evaluation of the Knowledge Level of Vocational High School Teachers About Learning Disabilities. [Master’s Thesis, Hacettepe University, Institute of Educational Sciences].
35. Gersten, R., Chard, D.J., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S.K., Morphy, P., and Flojo, J. (2009). A Meta-Analysis of Mathematics Instructional Interventions for Students with Learning Disabilities: Technical Report, Instructional Research Group.10.3102/0034654309334431 ↗
36. UNESCO (2020). Global Education Monitoring Report Summary, 2020: Inclusion and Education: All Means All (Turkish), UNESCO. Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373721_tur.
37. Online university teaching during and after the COVID-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y ↗
38. De Krischler, M., and Pit-ten Cate, I.M. (2019). Pre- and in-service teachers’ attitudes about students with learning difficulties and challenges behavior. Front. Psychol., 10.10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00327 ↗
39. Interventions for primary school children with difficulties in mathematics10.1016/bs.acdb.2017.04.004 ↗
40. The Use of Distance Learning and E-learning in Students with Learning Disabilities: A Review on the Effects and some Hint of Analysis on the Use during COVID-19 Outbreak10.2174/1745017902117010092 ↗
41. Teaching math online to secondary students with learning disabilities: Moving beyond the pandemic10.1177/00400599221092136 ↗
42. Cassibba, R., Ferrarello, D., Mammana, M.F., Musso, P., Pennisi, M., and Taranto, E. (2020). Teaching mathematics at distance: A challenge for universities. Educ. Sci., 11.10.3390/educsci11010001 ↗
43. Videla, R., Rossel, S., Muñoz, C., and Aguayo, C. (2022). Online Mathematics education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Didactic strategies, educational resources, and educational contexts. Educ. Sci., 12.10.3390/educsci12070492 ↗
44. Marienko, M., Nosenko, Y., Sukhikh, A., Tataurov, V., and Shyshkina, M. (2020). Personalization of learning through adaptive technologies in the context of sustainable development of teachers education. arXiv.10.1051/e3sconf/202016610015 ↗
45. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Scientific Research Methods, Pegem Academy Publishing.
46. Cokluk, O., Sekercioglu, G., and Buyukozturk, S. (2012). Multivariate Statistics for Social Sciences: SPSS and LISREL Applications, Pegem Academy. [2nd ed.].
47. Tabachnick, B.G. (2007). Experimental Designs Using ANOVA, Thomson/Brooks/Cole.
48. A review of exploratory factor analysis decisions and overview of current practices: What we are doing and how can we improve?10.1080/10447318.2015.1087664 ↗
49. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Erlbaum. [2nd ed.].
50. Teacher education in times of COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal: National, institutional, and pedagogical responses10.1080/02607476.2020.1799709 ↗
51. Distance education support for students with autism spectrum disorder and complex needs during COVID-19 and school closures10.1177/8756870520959658 ↗
52. Innovative pedagogical technologies in education system