Mitigating Urban Congestion: A Cooperative Reservation Framework for Automated Vehicles
Source abstract
Abstract
Today’s urban environments are complex, highly congested traffic scenarios that suffer from multiple unsolved problems such as traffic jams and congestion. These problems pose a significant increase in the risks and probability of traffic accidents in modern cities, which have experienced an enormous growth in the number of vehicles. This work introduces a centralized arbitration framework designed for Cooperative Connected Automated Vehicles (CCAVs) to make real-time decisions and resolve conflicts among various driving strategies or behaviors to facilitate resource reservation based on their collaborative actions. Cooperation and arbitration are two of the most important areas of research that seek to provide tools and mechanisms for the optimization and control of traffic flow at critical locations such as intersections and traffic circles. The approach presented, fully implemented on ROS and capable of constructing a software-defined traffic control environment, is able to supervise in a distributed manner how any CCAV operates with the infrastructure, potentially reducing the number of vehicles waiting and harmonizing the traffic flow. The methodology proposed surpasses traditional driver-in-the-loop cooperation by delivering a higher level of automation for collaborative traffic behavior. This approach demonstrably reduces average waiting time by 13% and increases the total utilization of the traffic emplacement by 70% compared to the classic simulated traffic light model. The solution presented was tested on the Carla simulator, with a complete ROS-based vehicle automation solution that provides promising results for CCAV coordination in complex traffic scenarios through a general framework of behavior-based collaboration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Traffic control and management · Transportation and Mobility Innovations · Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Intelligent Systems Lab, University Carlos III of Madrid, 28911 Madrid, Spain
Control Learning and Systems Optimization Group, University Carlos III of Madrid, 28911 Madrid, Spain
Intelligent Coordination and Logistics Laboratory, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
Funding
MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 · Comunidad de Madrid
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Advanced Driver Assistance Systems from Autonomous to Cooperative Approach10.1080/01441640801987825 ↗
2. Hasenjäger, M., and Wersing, H. (2017, January 16–19). Personalization in Advanced Driver Assistance Systems and Autonomous Vehicles: A Review. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Yokohama, Japan.10.1109/ITSC.2017.8317803 ↗
3. Garikapati, D., and Shetiya, S.S. (2024). Autonomous Vehicles: Evolution of Artificial Intelligence and the Current Industry Landscape. Big Data Cogn. Comput., 8.10.3390/bdcc8040042 ↗
4. Towards the Next Level of Vehicle Automation Through Cooperative Driving: A Roadmap from Planning and Control Perspective10.1109/TIV.2024.3363873 ↗
5. Parekh, D., Poddar, N., Rajpurkar, A., Chahal, M., Kumar, N., Joshi, G.P., and Cho, W. (2022). A review on autonomous vehicles: Progress, methods and challenges. Electronics, 11.10.3390/electronics11142162 ↗
6. Garcia, J., Feng, Y., Shen, J., Almanee, S., Xia, Y., and Chen Alfred, Q. (July, January 27). A Comprehensive Study of Autonomous Vehicle Bugs. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering, Seoul, Repulic of Korea.
7. A Comprehensive review on limitations of autonomous driving and its impact on accidents and collisions10.1109/OJVT.2023.3335180 ↗
8. Technology developments and impacts of connected and autonomous vehicles: An overview10.3390/smartcities5010022 ↗
9. Mobility management in 5G-enabled vehicular networks: Models, protocols, and classification10.1145/3403953 ↗
10. Comprehensive survey on machine learning in vehicular network: Technology, applications and challenges10.1109/COMST.2021.3089688 ↗
11. Optimization of Resource Allocation for V2X Security Communication Based on Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning10.1109/TVT.2023.3340424 ↗
12. Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Resource Allocation for V2V Communications10.1109/TVT.2019.2897134 ↗
13. Jooriah, M., Datsenko, D., Almeida, J., Sousa, A., Silva, J., and Ferreira, J. (2024, January 29–31). Demo: Hardware-in-the-Loop Testing in V2X Simulation Environment. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC 2024), Kobe, Japan.10.1109/VNC61989.2024.10575963 ↗
14. Fu, Q., Zhang, L., Xu, Y., and You, F. (2025). The Review of Human–Machine Collaborative Intelligent Interaction With Driver Cognition in the Loop. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci.10.1002/sres.3141 ↗
15. González, D., Pérez, J., Milanés, V., Nashashibi, F., Tort, M.S., and Cuevas, A. (2017). Arbitration and sharing control strategies in the driving process. Towards a Common Software/Hardware Methodology for Future Advanced Driver Assistance Systems, River Publishers.
16. Virtual Traffic Signals: Safe, Rapid, Efficient and Autonomous Driving Without Traffic Control10.1109/TITS.2020.2998907 ↗
17. Integrated optimization of traffic signals and vehicle trajectories at isolated urban intersections10.1016/j.trb.2018.04.007 ↗
18. A multiagent approach to autonomous intersection management10.1613/jair.2502 ↗
19. Dresner, K., and Stone, P. (2004, January 19–23). Multiagent Traffic Management: A Reservation-Based Intersection Control Mechanism. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/1082473.1082545 ↗
20. Automated intersection control: Performance of future innovation versus current traffic signal control10.3141/2259-21 ↗
21. An Overview of the Efficiency of Roundabouts: Design Aspects and Contribution toward Safer Vehicle Movement10.3390/vehicles6010019 ↗
22. Paradoxes of reservation-based intersection controls in traffic networks10.1016/j.tra.2016.05.013 ↗
23. Recent development and applications of SUMO-Simulation of Urban MObility
24. On Optimizing Reservation-Based Intersection Controls10.1109/TITS.2016.2574948 ↗
25. A Comprehensive Survey on Cooperative Intersection Management for Heterogeneous Connected Vehicles10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3142450 ↗
26. Robot Operating System 2: Design, architecture, and uses in the wild10.1126/scirobotics.abm6074 ↗
27. Dosovitskiy, A., Ros, G., Codevilla, F., Lopez, A., and Koltun, V. (2017, January 13–15). CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulator. Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Robot Learning, Mountain View, CA, USA.
28. Yagüe-Cuevas, D., Sesmero, M.P., Marín-Plaza, P., Smith, S., Sanchis, A., and Armingol, J.M. (2024, January 16–18). Multi-Agent Simulation Scheme for Cooperative Connected Automated Mobility Based on ROS and Carla. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Traffic and Transportation, Florence, Italy.10.3233/ATDE241196 ↗
29. Cooperative Intersection Management: A Survey10.1109/TITS.2015.2471812 ↗
30. Decision making framework for autonomous vehicles driving behavior in complex scenarios via hierarchical state machine10.1007/s43684-021-00015-x ↗
31. Mission based systems for connected automated mobility10.1016/j.robot.2024.104772 ↗
32. Orzechowski, P.F., Burger, C., and Lauer, M. (November, January 9). Decision-Making for Automated Vehicles Using a Hierarchical Behavior-Based Arbitration Scheme. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/IV47402.2020.9304723 ↗
33. Yagüe-Cuevas, D., Marín-Plaza, P., Paz-Sesmero, M., and Sanchis, A. (2023, January 26–28). Towards a Robust Traffic Scene Representation in Cooperative Connected Automated Mobility. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Vehicle Technology and Intelligent Transport Systems, Prague, Czech Republic.10.5220/0011841100003479 ↗
34. Zhuy, Y., Alrashid, H., Bai, S., Zhang, C., Zhang, Z., Qu, Z., Ali, R.Y., and Magdy, A. (2024, January 13–16). On the Ecosystem of High-Definition (HD) Maps. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW 2024), Utrecht, The Netherlands.10.1109/ICDEW61823.2024.00010 ↗
35. A review of high-definition map creation methods for autonomous driving10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106125 ↗
36. Association for Standardization of Automation and Measuring Systems (2022, November 09). ASAM OpenDRIVE. Available online: https://www.asam.net/standards/detail/opendrive/.
37. Skrodzki, M. (2019). The k-d tree data structure and a proof for neighborhood computation in expected logarithmic time. arXiv.
38. Beygelzimer, A., Kakade, S., and Langford, J. (2006, January 25–29). Cover Trees for Nearest Neighbor. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2006), New York, NY, USA.10.1145/1143844.1143857 ↗
39. Zäschke, T., Zimmerli, C., and Norrie, M.C. (2014, January 22–27). The PH-tree: A Space-Efficient Storage Structure and Multi-Dimensional Index. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD ’14), New York, NY, USA.10.1145/2588555.2588564 ↗
40. Colledanchise, M., and Ögren, P. (2018). Behavior Trees in Robotics and AI: An Introduction, CRC Press.10.1201/9780429489105 ↗
41. Werling, M., Ziegler, J., Kammel, S., and Thrun, S. (2010, January 3–8). Optimal Trajectory Generation for Dynamic Street Scenarios in a Frenet Frame. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Anchorage, AK, USA.10.1109/ROBOT.2010.5509799 ↗
42. Deep learning for LiDAR-only and LiDAR-fusion 3D perception: A survey10.20517/ir.2021.20 ↗
43. Li, Y., Yu, A.W., Meng, T., Caine, B., Ngiam, J., Peng, D., Shen, J., Lu, Y., Zhou, D., and Le, Q.V. (2022, January 18–24). DeepFusion: Lidar-Camera Deep Fusion for Multi-Modal 3D Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2022), New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01667 ↗
44. Bai, X., Hu, Z., Zhu, X., Huang, Q., Chen, Y., Fu, H., and Tai, C.L. (2022, January 18–24). TransFusion: Robust LiDAR-Camera Fusion for 3D Object Detection with Transformers. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2022), New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.00116 ↗
45. BEVFusion: A simple and robust LiDAR-camera fusion framework
46. Moore, T., and Stouch, D. (2014, January 15–18). A Generalized Extended Kalman Filter Implementation for the Robot Operating System. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent Autonomous Systems (IAS 13), Padova, Italy.
47. Cai, D., Chen, K., Lin, Z., Li, D., Zhou, T., Ling, Y., and Leung, M.F. (2024). JointSTNet: Joint Pre-Training for Spatial-Temporal Traffic Forecasting. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., 1.10.1109/TCE.2024.3476129 ↗
48. A Lightweight and Accurate Spatial-Temporal Transformer for Traffic Forecasting10.1109/TKDE.2022.3233086 ↗
49. Spatial-temporal graph neural network for traffic forecasting: An overview and open research issues10.1007/s10489-021-02587-w ↗
50. Mixed-integer linear programming for optimal scheduling of autonomous vehicle intersection crossing10.1109/TIV.2018.2843163 ↗
51. Integrated schedule and trajectory optimization for connected automated vehicles in a conflict zone10.1109/TITS.2020.3027731 ↗
52. A time-independent trajectory optimization approach for connected and autonomous vehicles under reservation-based intersection control
53. Kueppers, G., Busch, J.P., Reiher, L., and Eckstein, L. (2024, January 24–27). V2AIX: A Multi-Modal Real-World Dataset of ETSI ITS V2X Messages in Public Road Traffic. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 27th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Edmonton, AL, Canada.10.1109/ITSC58415.2024.10920150 ↗
54. Karner, M., Peltola, J., Jerne, M., Kulas, L., and Priller, P. (2024). Vehicle communication platform to Anything-VehicleCAPTAIN. Intelligent Secure Trustable Things, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-54049-3 ↗
55. Reiher, L., Lampe, B., Woopen, T., Van Kempen, R., Beemelmanns, T., and Eckstein, L. (2022, January 16–18). Enabling Connectivity for Automated Mobility: A Novel MQTT-Based Interface Evaluated in a 5G Case Study on Edge-Cloud Lidar Object Detection. Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Electrical, Computer, Communications and Mechatronics Engineering (ICECCME 2022), Male, Maldives.10.1109/ICECCME55909.2022.9987813 ↗
56. (2025, April 20). Web del Laboratorio de Sistemas Inteligentes Enlarge Figures of the Article. Available online: https://www.uc3m.es/ss/Satellite/DeptInformatica/es/TextoDosColumnas/1371350946990/.