The Analysis of the Possibility to Conduct Orbital Manoeuvres of Nanosatellites in the Context of the Maximisation of a Specific Operational Task
Source abstract
Abstract
Satellite imaging has become very popular in recent years. Nanosatellites have been attracting growing interest as they proved to be a good alternative for the realisation of missions with the aim to monitor the environment from space and to acquire image data from every place on Earth. In spite of the short revisit time that is achieved by existing satellite constellations, a method was developed for the digital determination of the orbital manoeuvres for single nanosatellites. The aim of the analysis was to study the possibilities of the optimisation of orbital operations in the context of maximising the operational efficiency of the mission. The conducted experiments involved the assessment of various scenarios of orbital manoeuvres taking into consideration the key limitations, such as the available fuel weight, propulsion efficiency, and the requirements concerning time and energy. The obtained results revealed that the most efficient manoeuvres are those that balance the minimum consumption of fuel or energy with the maximum extension of the duration of the satellite’s stay above the area of interest. For example, slight adjustments to the altitude of the orbit with the use of Hohmann transfer proved to be optimal in terms of fuel costs. On the other hand, changes in inclination, although they are definitely energy-consuming, may significantly improve the coverage of the defined area. The conclusions from the conducted analyses confirmed that an appropriate strategy of orbital manoeuvres may greatly improve the operational efficiency of the nanosatellite, while, at the same time, continuing to save fuel and energy. It is suggested that future research should develop towards more advanced optimisation techniques, such as artificial intelligence algorithms that may additionally improve the precision and efficiency of planning orbital trajectories.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Spacecraft Design and Technology · Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems · Space Satellite Systems and Control
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Military University of Technology, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland
Funding
National Centre for Research and Development
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Roshan, S., Raunak, S., and Kaushik, D. (2021). Constellation Design of Remote Sensing Small Satellite for Infrastructure Monitoring in India. arXiv.
2. Luo, Q., Peng, W., Wu, G., and Xiao, Y. (2022). Orbital Maneuver Optimization of Earth Observation Satellites Using an Adaptive Differential Evolution Algorithm. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14091966 ↗
3. Low Earth Orbital Atomic Oxygen Interactions with Materials10.1557/PROC-851-NN8.1 ↗
4. (2024, January 17). It’s Some Kind of Space. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvO3FLcLC88&t=1360s.
5. Sub-Optimal Orbital Maneuvers for Artificial Satellites
6. Orbital maneuvers and space rendezvous10.1016/j.asr.2015.09.014 ↗
7. Curtis, H.D. (2020). Orbital Mechanics for Engineering Students, Elsevier Ltd.. [4th ed.].10.1016/B978-0-08-102133-0.00006-4 ↗
8. Optimal Satellite Orbit Design for Prioritized Multiple Targets with Threshold Observation Time Using Self-Adaptive Differential Evolution10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000393 ↗
9. Satellite Constellation Orbit Design Optimization with Combined Genetic Algorithm and Semianalytical Approach10.1155/2017/1235692 ↗
10. Satellite Orbit Design and Maintenance for Terrestrial Coverage10.2514/1.44120 ↗
11. Minimum-Time Trajectory Optimization of Low-Thrust Earth-Orbit Transfers with Eclipsing10.2514/1.A33416 ↗
12. Low-Thrust Minimum-Fuel Optimization in the Circular Restricted Three-Body Problem10.2514/1.G001080 ↗
13. Optimization of Minimum-Time Low-Thrust Transfers Using Convex Programming10.2514/1.A33995 ↗
14. Robust optimization of impulsive orbit transfers under actuation uncertainties10.1016/j.ast.2018.11.026 ↗
15. Hybrid multi-objective orbit-raising optimization with operational constraints10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.05.022 ↗
16. Real-Time Optimal Control for Spacecraft Orbit Transfer via Multiscale Deep Neural Networks10.1109/TAES.2018.2889571 ↗
17. Multi-objective optimization of agile satellite orbit design10.1016/j.asr.2018.08.037 ↗
18. Optimization of satellite constellation reconfiguration maneuvers10.1016/j.actaastro.2014.02.016 ↗
19. Paek, S.W., Kim, S., and de Weck, O. (2019). Optimization of Reconfigurable Satellite Constellations Using Simulated Annealing and Genetic Algorithm. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19040765 ↗
20. A guidance approach to satellite formation reconfiguration based on convex optimization and genetic algorithms10.1016/j.asr.2020.01.033 ↗
21. Reconfigurable Satellite Constellation Design for Disaster Monitoring Using Physical Programming10.1155/2020/8813685 ↗
22. Design of agile satellite constellation based on hybrid-resampling particle swarm optimization method10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.09.040 ↗
23. Optimal mission planning of the reconfiguration process of satellite constellations through orbital maneuvers: A novel technical framework10.1016/j.asr.2019.02.003 ↗
24. A multi-objective optimization framework of constellation design for emergency observation10.1016/j.asr.2020.09.031 ↗
25. Bate, R., Mueller, D., White, E., and Saylor, W. (2020). Fundamentals of Astrodynamics, Dover Publications. [2nd ed.].
26. Sutton, G.P., and Biblarz, O. (2017). Rocket Propulsion Elements, Wiley. [9th ed.].
27. Wertz, J.R. (2001). Mission Geometry, Springer. Orbit and Constellation Design and Management: Spacecraft Orbit and Attitude Systems.
28. Wertz, J.R., and Larson, W.J. (1999). Space Mission Analysis and Design, Springer. [3rd ed.]. Space Technology Library.
29. (2024, June 15). MultiScape100 CIS Product. Available online: https://simera-sense.com/products/multiscape100/.
30. (2024, October 06). CubeSat 6U CubeSat/ Nanosatellite M6P. Available online: https://nanoavionics.com/small-satellite-buses/6u-cubesat-nanosatellite-m6p/.
31. (2025, January 10). Sentinel-2 Operations. Available online: https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Operations/Sentinel-2_operations.
32. (2025, January 10). Successful Demonstration of Polish Missile Technologies. Flight of the ILR-33 “Amber” Missile”, Available online: https://ilot.lukasiewicz.gov.pl/udana-demonstracja-polskich-technologii-rakietowych-lot-rakiety-ilr-33-bursztyn/.
33. (2025, January 10). Why Do Starlink Satellites Use Krypton for Electric Propulsion Instead of Xenon?. Available online: https://chimniii.com/news/Technology/Technology-Starlink-why-do-starlink-satellites-use-krypton-for-electric-propulsion-instead-of-xenon.html.
34. Ruggiero, A., Pergola, S., Marcuccio, S., and Andrenucci, M. (2011, January 11–15). Low-Thrust Maneuvers for the Efficient Correction of Orbital Elements, IEPC-2011-102. Proceedings of the 32nd International Electric Propulsion Conference, Wiesbaden, Germany.
35. Derfel, G. (2025, January 13). From Orbit to Orbit, Institute of Physics, Lodz University of Technology. Available online: https://www.deltami.edu.pl/media/articles/2020/08/delta-2020-08-z-orbity-na-orbite.pdf.
36. SpaceX Rocket Data Satisfies Elementary Hohmann Transfer Formula10.1088/1361-6552/ab5f4c ↗