Robustness Benchmark Evaluation and Optimization for Real-Time Vehicle Detection Under Multiple Adverse Conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents a robustness benchmark evaluation and optimization for vehicle detection. Real-time vehicle detection has become an essential means of data perception in the transportation field, covering various aspects such as intelligent transportation systems, video surveillance, and autonomous driving. However, evaluating and optimizing the robustness of vehicle detection in real traffic scenarios remains challenging. When data distributions change, such as the impact of adverse weather or sensor damages, model reliability cannot be guaranteed. We first conducted a large-scale robustness benchmark evaluation for vehicle detection. Analysis revealed that adverse weather, motion, and occlusion are the most detrimental factors to vehicle detection performance. The impact of color changes and noise, while present, is relatively less pronounced. Moreover, the robustness of vehicle detection is closely linked to its baseline performance and model size. And as the severity of corruption intensifies, the performance of models experiences a sharp drop. When the data distribution of images changes, the features of the vehicles that the model focuses on are weakened, making the activation level of the targets significantly reduced. By evaluation, we provided guidance and direction for optimizing detection robustness. Based on these findings, we propose TDIRM, a traffic-degraded image restoration model based on stable diffusion, designed to efficiently restore degraded images in real traffic scenarios and thereby enhance the robustness of vehicle detection. The model introduces an image semantics encoder (ISE) module to extract features that align with the latent description of the real background while excluding degradation-related information. Additionally, a triple control embedding attention (TCE) module is proposed to fully integrate all condition controls. Through a triple condition control mechanism, TDIRM achieves restoration results with high fidelity and consistency. Experimental results demonstrate that TDIRM improves vehicle detection mAP by 6.92% on real dense fog data, especially for small distant vehicles that were severely obscured by fog. By enabling semantic-structural-content collaborative optimization within the diffusion framework, TDIRM establishes a novel paradigm for traffic scene image restoration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fault Detection and Control Systems · Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses · Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
Funding
Key R&D Program of Hunan Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031 ↗
2. Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., and Farhadi, A. (2016, January 27–30). You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.91 ↗
3. Redmon, J., and Farhadi, A. (2018). YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement. arXiv.
4. Liu, W., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Szegedy, C., Reed, S., Fu, C.Y., and Berg, A.C. (2016, January 11–14). SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector. Proceedings of the Computer Vision—ECCV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2 ↗
5. Law, H., and Deng, J. (2018, January 8–14). CornerNet: Detecting Objects as Paired Keypoints. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Munich, Germany.10.1007/978-3-030-01264-9_45 ↗
6. Duan, K., Bai, S., Xie, L., Qi, H., Huang, Q., and Tian, Q. (November, January 27). CenterNet: Keypoint Triplets for Object Detection. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Seoul, Republic of Korea.10.1109/ICCV.2019.00667 ↗
7. Cai, Z., and Vasconcelos, N. (2018, January 18–23). Cascade R-CNN: Delving Into High Quality Object Detection. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00644 ↗
8. Yang, Z., Liu, S., Hu, H., Wang, L., and Lin, S. (November, January 27). RepPoints: Point Set Representation for Object Detection. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Seoul, Republic of Korea.10.1109/ICCV.2019.00975 ↗
9. Carion, N., Massa, F., Synnaeve, G., Usunier, N., Kirillov, A., and Zagoruyko, S. (2020, January 23–28). End-to-End Object Detection with Transformers. Proceedings of the Computer Vision—ECCV 2020, Glasgow, UK.10.1007/978-3-030-58452-8_13 ↗
10. Kim, Y. (2014, January 25–29). Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classification. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Doha, Qatar.10.3115/v1/D14-1181 ↗
11. Lucas-Kanade 20 Years On: A Unifying Framework10.1023/B:VISI.0000011205.11775.fd ↗
12. Support vector machines10.1109/5254.708428 ↗
13. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection10.1109/CVPR.2005.177 ↗
14. Rublee, E., Rabaud, V., Konolige, K., and Bradski, G. (2011, January 6–13). ORB: An efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF. Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision, Washington, DC, USA.10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126544 ↗
15. Girshick, R. (2015, January 7–13). Fast R-CNN. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Santiago, Chile.10.1109/ICCV.2015.169 ↗
16. He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollár, P., and Girshick, R. (2017, January 22–27). Mask R-CNN. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Venice, Italy.10.1109/ICCV.2017.322 ↗
17. LRTA-SP: Low Rank Tensor Approximation with Saliency Prior for Small Target Detection in Infrared Videos10.1109/TAES.2024.3474652 ↗
18. Tian, Z., Shen, C., Chen, H., and He, T. (November, January 27). FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detection. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Seoul, Republic of Korea.10.1109/ICCV.2019.00972 ↗
19. Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghan, M., Mindere, M., Heigold, G., and Gelly, S. (2020). An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale. arXiv.
20. Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., and Guo, B. (2021, January 10–17). Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00986 ↗
21. Marathe, A., Walambe, R., and Kotecha, K. (2022). In Rain or Shine: Understanding and Overcoming Dataset Bias for Improving Robustness Against Weather corruption for Autonomous Vehicles. arXiv.
22. Wang, X., Wang, D., Li, S., Li, S., Zeng, P., and Liang, X. (2022, January 28–30). Low-light Traffic Objects Detection for Automated Vehicles. Proceedings of the 2022 6th CAA International Conference on Vehicular Control and Intelligence (CVCI), Nanjing, China.10.1109/CVCI56766.2022.9964586 ↗
23. Liu, Z., He, Y., Wang, C., and Song, R. (2020). Analysis of the Influence of Foggy Weather Environment on the Detection Effect of Machine Vision Obstacles. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20020349 ↗
24. Traffic Sign Detection Under Challenging Conditions: A Deeper Look into Performance Variations and Spectral Characteristics10.1109/TITS.2019.2931429 ↗
25. Lightweight object detection ensemble framework for autonomous vehicles in challenging weather conditions10.1155/2021/5278820 ↗
26. Shen, Y., Zheng, L., Shu, M., Li, W., Goldstein, T., and Lin, M.C. (2021). Improving Robustness of Learning-based Autonomous Steering Using Adversarial Images. arXiv.
27. Li, X., Chen, X., Zhang, S., Hu, J., Fan, Z., Pang, X., and Liang, J. (2022, January 13–16). Environmental Adaptability of Visual Perception System from Vibration-blurred Image Perspective. Proceedings of the 2022 Global Reliability and Prognostics and Health Management, Yantai, China.10.1109/PHM-Yantai55411.2022.9942028 ↗
28. Kamann, C., and Rother, C. (2020, January 13–17). Benchmarking the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation Models. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00885 ↗
29. Cordts, M., Omran, M., Ramos, S., and Rehfeld, T. (2016, January 27–30). The cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene understanding. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.350 ↗
30. Yu, F., Xian, W., Chen, Y., Liu, F., and Liao, M. (2018). Bdd100k: A diverse driving video database with scalable annotation tooling. arXiv.
31. Geiger, A., Lenz, P., and Urtasun, R. (2012, January 16–21). Are we ready for autonomous driving? The KITTI vision benchmark suite. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Providence, RI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2012.6248074 ↗
32. Sun, P., Kretzschmar, H., Dotiwalla, X., Chouard, A., Patnaik, V., Tsui, P., Guo, J., Zhou, Y., Chai, Y., and Caine, B. (2020, January 13–17). Scalability in perception for autonomous driving: Waymo open dataset. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00252 ↗
33. Caesar, H., Bankiti, V., Lang, A.H., Vora, S., Liong, V.E., Xu, Q., Krishnan, A., Pan, Y., Baldan, G., and Beijbom, O. (2020, January 13–17). Nuscenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01164 ↗
34. Hassaballah, K.M. (2020). DAWN: Vehicle detection in adverse weather nature Dataset. arXiv.
35. Hendrycks, D., and Dietterich, T. (2019). Benchmarking neural network robustness to common corruption and perturbations. arXiv.
36. Dong, Y., Kang, C., Zhang, J., Zhu, Z., Wang, Y., Yang, X., Su, H., Wei, X., and Zhu, J. (2023). Benchmarking robustness of 3d object detection to common corruption in autonomous driving. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.00105 ↗
37. Benchmarking Object Detection Robustness against Real-World corruption10.1007/s11263-024-02096-6 ↗
38. Islam, M., Nguyen, G., and Pan, R. (2019, January 26–30). A comprehensive study on deep learning bug characteristics. Proceedings of the ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE, Tallinn, Estonia.
39. Xie, S., Li, Z., Wang, Z., and Xie, C. (2023). On the adversarial robustness of camera-based 3d object detection. arXiv.
40. Single Image Haze Removal Using Dark Channel Prior10.1109/TPAMI.2010.168 ↗
41. A Fast Single Image Haze Removal Algorithm Using Color Attenuation Prior10.1109/TIP.2015.2446191 ↗
42. Qin, X., Wang, Z., Bai, Y., Xie, X., and Jia, H. (2020, January 7–12). FFA-Net: Feature Fusion Attention Network for Single Image Dehazing. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, New York, NY, USA.10.1609/aaai.v34i07.6865 ↗
43. Li, B., Peng, X., Wang, Z., Xu, J., and Feng, D. (2017, January 22–29). AOD-Net: All-in-One Dehazing Network. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Venice, Italy.10.1109/ICCV.2017.511 ↗
44. Song, Y., He, Z., Qian, H., and Du, X. (2022). Vision Transformers for Single Image Dehazing. arXiv.10.1109/TIP.2023.3256763 ↗
45. Zamir, S.W., Arora, A., Khan, S., Hayat, M., Khan, F.S., and Yang, M. (2022, January 18–24). Restormer: Efficient Transformer for High-Resolution Image Restoration. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.00564 ↗
46. Wang, Z., Cun, X., and Bao, J. (2023). DiffBir: Diffusion models for blind image restoration. arXiv.
47. Han, M., Wang, Y., Li, Z., Yao, L., Chang, X., and Qiao, Y. (2023, January 1–6). HTML: Hybrid Temporal-scale Multimodal Learning Framework for Referring Video Object Segmentation. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Paris, France.10.1109/ICCV51070.2023.01234 ↗
48. Jung, A.B., Wada, K., and Crall, J. (2020, February 05). Imgaug. Available online: https://github.com/aleju/imgaug.
49. Lin, T., Goyal, P., Girshick, R.B., and He, K. (2017). Focal loss for dense object detection. arXiv.10.1109/ICCV.2017.324 ↗
50. Grad-CAM: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization10.1007/s11263-019-01228-7 ↗
51. Vision and the Atmosphere10.1023/A:1016328200723 ↗
52. Semantic Foggy Scene Understanding with Synthetic Data
53. Vision and Rain
54. Hu, X., Fu, C.W., Zhu, L., and Heng, P.-A. (2019, January 15–20). Depth-Attentional Features for Single-Image Rain Removal. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Long Beach, CA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2019.00821 ↗
55. Optical properties of ice and snow10.1098/rsta.2018.0161 ↗
56. Loh, Y.P., and Chan, C.S. (2018). Getting to Know Low-light Images with The Exclusively Dark Dataset. arXiv.10.1016/j.cviu.2018.10.010 ↗
57. Chen, C., Chen, Q., Xu, J., and Koltun, V. (2018, January 18–23). Learning to See in the Dark. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00347 ↗