Frequency-Dependent Acoustic Reflection for Soil Classification in a Controlled Aquatic Environment
Source abstract
Abstract
Seafloor soil classification is essential for marine engineering, environmental monitoring, and geological surveys. Traditional classification methods, such as physical sampling and acoustic backscatter analysis, have inherent limitations, including spatial constraints and inconsistencies in distinguishing sediments with similar acoustic properties. This study uses frequency-dependent acoustic reflection coefficients to investigate a novel spectral-based approach to seabed soil classification. Experiments were conducted in a controlled aquatic environment to isolate the spectral characteristics of two soil types: poorly graded sand (SP) and poorly graded gravel (GP). The research employed calibrated transducers to measure reflection coefficients across the 100–400 kHz frequency range, allowing for a comparative spectral analysis between the two sediments. The results demonstrate that SP and GP exhibit distinct spectral fingerprints, with SP showing higher reflectance across all measured frequencies, while GP displays a more variable spectral response. These findings suggest that frequency-dependent reflectance provides a more sensitive and accurate classification criterion than conventional backscatter intensity analysis. By eliminating environmental variability and focusing on intrinsic soil properties, this study establishes a foundation for automated, non-invasive classification methods that could be integrated into machine learning frameworks for real-time seabed characterization. The proposed methodology enhances the precision of remote sensing techniques and presents significant advantages in offshore engineering, environmental monitoring, and hydrographic surveys. Future research should extend this approach to diverse sediment types and open marine environments to refine and validate its applicability in real-world scenarios.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Underwater Acoustics Research · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Civil Engineering Department, Sami Shamoon College of Engineering, Jabotinsky 84, 77245 Ashdod, Israel
Funding
SCE · European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie RISE project EffectFact
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Remote estimation of surficial seafloor properties through the application of Angular Range Analysis to multibeam sonar data10.1007/s11001-007-9019-4 ↗
2. Shallow-water imaging multibeam sonars: A new tool for investigating seafloor processes in the coastal zone and on the continental shelf10.1007/BF00313877 ↗
3. Evaluation of four supervised learning methods for benthic habitat mapping using backscatter from multi-beam sonar10.3390/rs4113427 ↗
4. A Bayesian approach to seafloor classification using multi-beam echo-sounder backscatter data10.1016/j.apacoust.2008.07.013 ↗
5. Developments in the application of multibeam sonar backscatter for seafloor habitat mapping10.1016/j.apacoust.2008.08.004 ↗
6. Lurton, X., Lamarche, G., Brown, C., Lucieer, V., Rice, G., Schimel, A., and Weber, T. (2015). Backscatter Measurements by Seafloor-Mapping Sonars: Guidelines and Recommendations, GeoHab (Marine Geological and Biological Habitat Mapping).
7. Interlinking backscatter, grain size and benthic community structure10.1016/j.ecss.2014.05.025 ↗
8. Acoustic seabed classification: Current practice and future directions10.1093/icesjms/fsn061 ↗
9. A multi-model ensemble approach to seabed mapping10.1016/j.seares.2014.10.013 ↗
10. Correlation of side-scan backscatter intensity with grain-size distribution of shelf sediments, New Jersey margin10.1007/s003670000032 ↗
11. Penrose, J., and Siwabessy, J. (2005). Review of Acoustic Techniques for Seabed Classification and Benthic Habitat Assessment. Coastal Water Habitat Mapping (CWHM) Project, Coastal CRC Technical Report, GeoHab (Marine Geological and Biological Habitat Mapping).
12. Automated acoustic seabed classification of multibeam images of Stanton Banks10.1016/j.apacoust.2008.07.011 ↗
13. Acquisition and processing of backscatter data for habitat mapping–Comparison of multibeam and sidescan systems10.1016/j.apacoust.2008.07.010 ↗
14. Analysis of seafloor backscatter strength dependence on the survey azimuth using multibeam echosounder data10.1007/s11001-017-9318-3 ↗
15. Acoustic seabed segmentation from direct statistical clustering of entire multibeam sonar backscatter curves10.1016/j.csr.2010.12.002 ↗
16. Relationships between multibeam backscatter, sediment grain size and Posidonia oceanica seagrass distribution10.1016/j.csr.2010.09.006 ↗
17. Analysis of calibrated seafloor backscatter for habitat classification methodology and case study of 158 spots in the Bay of Biscay and Celtic Sea10.1007/s11001-018-9342-y ↗
18. Backscatter calibration of high-frequency multibeam echosounder using a reference surface10.1007/s11001-018-9348-5 ↗
19. Angular range analysis of acoustic themes from Stanton Banks Ireland: A link between visual interpretation and multibeam echosounder angular signatures10.1016/j.apacoust.2008.09.008 ↗
20. Fonseca, L., and Calder, B. (2005, January 29–31). Geocoder: An efficient backscatter map constructor. Proceedings of the U.S. Hydrographic Conference 2005, San Diego, CA, USA.
21. Kushnir, U., and Frid, V. (2022). Spectral Acoustic Fingerprints of Sand and Sandstone Sea Bottoms. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10.10.3390/jmse10121923 ↗
22. Kushnir, A., and Frid, V. (2023). Spectrum-Based Logistic Regression Modeling for the Sea Bottom Soil Categorization. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10.10.20944/preprints202305.1212.v1 ↗
23. Arias, A. (1970). A measure of earthquake intensity. Seismic Design for Nuclear Plants, MIT Press.
24. Greenberg, M., Kushnir, U., and Frid, V. (2025). Innovative Regression Model for Frequency-Dependent Acoustic Source Strength in the Aquatic Environment: Bridging Scientific Insight and Practical Applications. Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25051560 ↗
25. DAVID, M. (1977). Geostatistical Ore Reserve Estimation, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.