Hybrid Improved PSO Algorithm for Soil Property Parameter Estimation
Source abstract
Abstract
This study proposes a hybrid PSO-EDO algorithm, integrating Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and the Exponential Distribution Optimizer (EDO) for efficient and accurate estimation of soil property parameters. The proposed algorithm combines the strengths of Standard PSO (SPSO) and the Exponential Distribution Optimizer (EDO). Three key innovations are introduced: (1) SPM chaotic mapping enhances initial population diversity; (2) dynamic inertia weight balances global exploration and local exploitation; (3) the memoryless property of EDO improves escape capability from local optima. Benchmark tests demonstrate that PSO-EDO achieves near-theoretical optimal convergence errors (mean error ≤ 10−16 for unimodal functions such as F1 and F2) and reduces the computation time by 14.5% compared to EDO. For multimodal functions (e.g., F3), PSO-EDO significantly outperforms PSO-WOA (Particle Swarm Optimization-Whale Optimization Algorithm) with a 22.3% reduction in error. Simulation experiments further validate its engineering practicality: in soil parameter estimation, PSO-EDO completes 1000 iterations in just 1.95 s, with key parameters (e.g., sinkage coefficient n) controlled within a 7.32% error margin. This provides an efficient solution for real-time traversability assessment of autonomous vehicles on soft terrains.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Smart Agriculture and AI · Soil Geostatistics and Mapping · Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Automotive and Traffic Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Slip sinkage effect in soil–vehicle mechanics10.1016/j.jterra.2009.08.005 ↗
2. Do lunar rover wheels sink equally on Earth and Moon?10.1016/j.rinp.2019.102617 ↗
3. Bekker, M.G. (1956). Theory of Land Locomotion: The Mechanics of Vehicle Mobility, University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.9690401 ↗
4. Wong, J.Y. (2001). Theory of Ground Vehicles, Wiley-Interscience.
5. Principles of soil-vehicle mechanics
6. Janosi, Z., and Hanamoto, B. (1961). The analytical determination of drawbar pull as a function of slip for tracked vehicle in deformable soils. Mechanics of Soil-Vehicle Systems: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on the Mechanics of Soil-Vehicle Systems, Edizioni Minerva Tecnica.
7. Yin, Z., Wang, F., Tang, T., Luo, Q., and Xiang, K. (2016, January 14–15). The forest fire prediction in JiangXi province based on PSO-GA-BP neural network. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Advanced Research and Technology in Industry Applications (WARTIA 2016), Dalian, China.10.2991/wartia-16.2016.270 ↗
8. A Review of Intelligent Ground Vehicle Technologies
9. A multiobjective optimization of task workflow scheduling using hybridization of PSO and WOA algorithms in cloud-fog computing10.1007/s10586-024-04522-3 ↗
10. Zhu, H., and Ding, Y. (2023). Optimized Dynamic Collision Avoidance Algorithm for USV Path Planning. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23094567 ↗
11. Research on battery thermal management system based on liquid cooling plate with honeycomb-like flow channel10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119324 ↗
12. SPSO-Pruner: A Network Pruning Method on YOLOv5 for Fewer Categories Scenarios10.1007/s11063-022-10909-3 ↗
13. Application of improved hybrid whale optimization algorithm to optimization problems10.1007/s00521-023-08370-x ↗
14. Exponential distribution optimizer (EDO): A novel math-inspired algorithm for global optimization and engineering problems10.1007/s10462-023-10403-9 ↗
15. Interaction mechanics model for rigid driving wheels of planetary rovers moving on sandy terrain with consideration of multiple physical effects10.1002/rob.21533 ↗
16. Development and numerical validation of an improved prediction model for wheel-soil interaction under multiple operating conditions10.1016/j.jterra.2018.04.005 ↗
17. Kennedy, J., and Eberhart, R.C. (December, January 27). Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the ICNN’95—IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN), Perth, Australia.
18. Particle swarm optimization: A comprehensive survey10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3142859 ↗
19. Bird swarm algorithms with chaotic mapping10.1007/s10462-019-09704-9 ↗
20. Ban, D.H., Lü, X., and Wang, X.Y. (2019). Computer Science, Hohai University.
21. Shi, Y., and Eberhart, R.C. (1999, January 6–9). Empirical study of particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 1999), Washington, DC, USA.
22. Wu, G., Mallipeddi, R., and Suganthan, P.N. (2017). Problem Definitions and Evaluation Criteria for the CEC 2017 Competition on Constrained Real-Parameter Optimization, National University of Defense Technology. Technical Report.
23. Eberhart, R., and Kennedy, J. (1995, January 4–6). A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science (MHS’95), Nagoya, Japan.
24. Sun, D.-B., Di, Y.-Q., and Cui, H.-H. (2015, January 30–31). A real-time vehicle-terramechanics model for visual simulation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Materials Engineering and Information Technology Applications (MEITA 2015), Guilin, China.10.2991/meita-15.2015.186 ↗