Strategic Prioritization for Sustainable Development in the Logistics Industry: A FAHP-NFAD Approach
Source abstract
Abstract
The development of sustainable strategies in the logistics industry is becoming increasingly important due to environmental, economic, and social pressures. This study aims to identify and rank sustainable strategic options in the logistics industry, thereby providing priorities and a hierarchical structure to support the decision-making process. The system of sustainable strategic options is built on the theory of three core factors. The Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Neutral Fuzzy Axiom Design method is applied to evaluate and rank these options, helping to clarify the relationships and priorities between strategies. The results indicate that strategies such as optimizing green processes, training human resources in green technology, investing in technological innovation, and strengthening cooperation with green partners are the most effective options for the logistics industry. Strategies related to government support, cost optimization, and meeting consumers’ green needs play an important role in the hierarchical structure. This study provides practical recommendations for government agencies and businesses, contributing to promoting sustainable development in green logistics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quality and Supply Management · Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management · Sustainable Supply Chain Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Industrial Systems Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education, Ho Chi Minh City 71307, Vietnam
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Is environmental sustainability a strategic priority for logistics service providers?10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.096 ↗
2. Driving factors of CO2 emission reduction in the logistics industry: An assessment of the RCEP and SAARC economies10.1007/s10668-022-02840-3 ↗
3. Development of a strategic framework for sustainable supply chain management10.3934/environsci.2021034 ↗
4. Multi-Objective optimization for green logistics planning and operations management: From economic to environmental perspective10.1016/j.cie.2024.109988 ↗
5. Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: The mediating role of environmental strategy and green innovation10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120262 ↗
6. Green branding in fast fashion: Examining the impact of social sustainability claims on Chinese consumer behaviour and brand perception10.1108/CCIJ-12-2023-0169 ↗
7. Gruchmann, T. (2019). Advanced Green Logistics Strategies and Technologies. Operations, Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-92447-2_29 ↗
8. Integrating sustainability and resilience in the supply chain: A systematic literature review and a research agenda10.1002/bse.2776 ↗
9. Hadi, S., Miru, S., Kaseng, S., and Zahra, F. (2022, January 7–8). Barriers to Green Logistics Implementation in Indonesia: A Preliminary Study. Proceedings of the 2nd International Interdisciplinary Conference on Environmental Sciences and Sustainable Developments Education and Green Economy (IICESSD EGE 2022), Palu, Indonesia.
10. Nexus between green logistic operations and triple bottom line: Evidence from infrastructure-led Chinese outward foreign direct investment in Belt and Road host countries10.1007/s11356-021-12470-3 ↗
11. Factors influencing the application of green logistics: Findings from the lithuanian logistics center
12. Green Logistics Development Decision-Making: Factor Identification and Hierarchical Framework Construction10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3008443 ↗
13. Matić, B., Jovanović, S., Das, D.K., Zavadskas, E.K., Stević, Ž., Sremac, S., and Marinković, M. (2019). A New Hybrid MCDM Model: Sustainable Supplier Selection in a Construction Company. Symmetry, 11.10.3390/sym11030353 ↗
14. Fuzzy sets10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X ↗
15. Green supplier selection using an AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS framework10.1108/SCM-04-2014-0142 ↗
16. Applying an Ordinal Priority Approach Based Neutrosophic Fuzzy Axiomatic Design Approach to Develop Sustainable Geothermal Energy Source
17. Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.035 ↗
18. Assessing sustainability in the supply chain: A triple bottom line approach10.1016/j.apm.2014.10.055 ↗
19. Supply chain sustainability during turbulent environment: Examining the role of firm capabilities and government regulation10.1007/s12063-021-00203-1 ↗
20. The impact of government subsidy on supply Chains’ sustainability innovation10.1016/j.omega.2018.06.012 ↗
21. Determinants of consumer demand for circular economy products. A case for reuse and remanufacturing for sustainable development10.1002/bse.2636 ↗
22. A step forward on sustainability: The nexus of environmental responsibility, green technology, clean energy and green finance10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105945 ↗
23. Green logistics performance and sustainability reporting practices of the logistics sector: The moderating effect of corporate governance10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120718 ↗
24. Human resources development as an element of sustainable HRM—With the focus on production engineers10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124008 ↗
25. Khan, M., Parvaiz, G.S., Ali, A., Jehangir, M., Hassan, N., and Bae, J. (2022). A Model for Understanding the Mediating Association of Transparency between Emerging Technologies and Humanitarian Logistics Sustainability. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14116917 ↗
26. Assessment of ideal smart network strategies for logistics companies using an integrated picture fuzzy LBWA–CoCoSo framework10.1108/MD-12-2021-1621 ↗
27. Strategic integration of environmental sustainability in inland logistics: A multi-criteria decision-making approach10.1002/bse.3885 ↗
28. Evaluation of the smart reverse logistics development scenarios using a novel MCDM model10.1016/j.cesys.2022.100099 ↗
29. Luyen, L.A., and Van Thanh, N. (2022). Logistics Service Provider Evaluation and Selection: Hybrid SERVQUAL–FAHP–TOPSIS Model. Processes, 10.10.3390/pr10051024 ↗
30. A novel hybrid MCDM model based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy VIKOR for city logistics concept selection10.1016/j.eswa.2014.07.021 ↗
31. The Selection of the Logistics Center Location Based on MCDM/A Methodology10.1016/j.trpro.2014.10.034 ↗
32. Flexible decision modeling of reverse logistics system: A value adding MCDM approach for alternative selection10.1016/j.rcim.2008.01.006 ↗
33. Stević, Ž., Tanackov, I., Puška, A., Jovanov, G., Vasiljević, J., and Lojaničić, D. (2021). Development of Modified SERVQUAL–MCDM Model for Quality Determination in Reverse Logistics. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13105734 ↗
34. MCDM applications in logistics performance evaluation: A literature review10.1002/mcda.1774 ↗
35. A two-stage MCDM model for reverse logistics network design of waste batteries in Turkey10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110373 ↗
36. A new hybrid MCDM framework for third-party logistics provider selection under sustainability perspectives10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121009 ↗
37. How does environmental regulation affect real green technology innovation and strategic green technology innovation?10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162221 ↗
38. Green supply chain network optimization and the trade-off between environmental and economic objectives10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.05.012 ↗
39. Inventory optimization in a green environment with two warehouses10.1016/j.igd.2023.100087 ↗
40. Adaptative Approach to Implementing Good Practices to Support Environmentally Friendly Urban Freight Transport Management10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.009 ↗
41. Enhancing waste management strategies in Latin America under a holistic environmental assessment perspective: A review for policy support10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.393 ↗
42. Engaging Employees in Sustainable Development—A Case Study of Environmental Education and Awareness Training in Hong Kong10.1002/bse.1903 ↗
43. Rahla, K., Mateus, R., and Bragança, L. (2021). Implementing Circular Economy Strategies in Buildings—From Theory to Practice. Appl. Syst. Innov., 4.10.3390/asi4020026 ↗
44. Energy optimization of logistics transport vehicle driven by fuel cell hybrid power system10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111887 ↗
45. Promotion strategies for environmentally friendly packaging: A stochastic differential game perspective10.1007/s13762-022-04453-9 ↗
46. Management opportunities to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from Chinese agriculture10.1016/j.agee.2015.04.035 ↗
47. A comprehensive analysis of green building rating systems for data centers10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.112874 ↗
48. Energy Management Systems and Strategies in Buildings Sector: A Scoping Review10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3075485 ↗
49. Data-Driven Flexible Vehicle Scheduling and Route Optimization10.1109/TITS.2022.3204644 ↗
50. The impact of collaborative decision-making on logistics service performance for container shipping services10.1108/MABR-12-2019-0061 ↗
51. Waqas, M., Dong, Q., Ahmad, N., Zhu, Y., and Nadeem, M. (2018). Critical Barriers to Implementation of Reverse Logistics in the Manufacturing Industry: A Case Study of a Developing Country. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10114202 ↗
52. Vornhusen, B., and Kopfer, H. (2015, January 23–25). Emission vehicle routing problem with split delivery and a heterogeneous vehicle fleet. Proceedings of the Computational Logistics: 6th International Conference, ICCL 2015, Delft, The Netherlands. Proceedings 6.
53. Foumani, M. (2023, January 6–8). Adaptation of a Collaborative Truck and Robotic Vehicle for Sustainable Supply Chain Operations. Proceedings of the International Conference on Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications, Taicang, China.10.1007/978-3-031-70684-4_24 ↗