journal article·2025-04-13Open access

Assessing the Metrological Reliability of Static Firing Tests of Rocket Motors Through the Evaluation of Thrust and Total Impulse Measurement Uncertainty

Fernando de Paula Leite Castor, Carlos Roberto Hall Barbosa, Elcio Cruz de Oliveira

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 8

Abstract

A solid propellant rocket motor is a propulsion system used in missiles and rockets that burns a propellant, typically composed of a mixture of fuel and an oxidizer, to generate the thrust necessary to propel the vehicle. During both the development and quality assurance phases, static firing tests of rocket motors are conducted to verify whether the system requirements meet the product specifications. These tests aim to produce two main types of graphs, “thrust versus burn time” and “pressure versus burn time,” both generated by the rocket motor during the burn. While thrust and pressure are important parameters in the design of a rocket motor, total impulse is the quantity that incorporates the crucial element of time, measuring how high a rocket can be launched. To ensure greater metrological reliability in static tests of rocket motors, it is important to carefully evaluate the uncertainty levels in the measurement chain of the data acquisition system. This work aims to assess the uncertainty levels expressed in the calculated total impulse values during a static firing test of a rocket motor at the Propulsion Jets Testing Laboratory of the Brazilian Army Technological Center. To estimate the measurement uncertainty of the chain in question, approaches based on combined and expanded uncertainty theories were adopted. These methodologies consider Type A and Type B uncertainties, providing a comprehensive and rigorous analysis. In addition to the uncertainties previously mentioned, the oscillation of the measured signal should also be recognized as a contributing factor to the overall uncertainty in the calculation of total impulse. By incorporating these various sources of uncertainty, we can achieve a more comprehensive and reliable understanding of the uncertainty associated with the measurements obtained from the measurement chain. This analysis yields a measurement uncertainty of 0.24% for thrust and 0.007% for impulse, both calculated at a confidence level of 95.45%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Rocket and propulsion systems research · Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation · Advanced Sensor Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centro Tecnológico do Exército, Avenida das Américas N° 28705, Barra de Guaratiba, Rio de Janeiro 23020-470, Brazil

Postgraduate Metrology Programme, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Marquês de São Vicente Street, 225, Gávea, Rio de Janeiro 22541-041, Brazil

Logistics, Operational Planning and Control, Measurement and Product Inventory Management, PETROBRAS S.A., Rio de Janeiro 20231-030, Brazil

Funding

Brazilian agency CNPq · Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Sutton, G.P., and Biblarz, O. (2011). Rocket Propulsion Elements, John Wiley & Sons.
2. Glascock, M.S., Rovey, J.L., and Polzin, K.A. (2020). Impulse and Performance Measurements of Electric Solid Propellant in a Laboratory Electrothermal Ablation-Fed Pulsed Plasma Thruster. Aerospace, 7.10.3390/aerospace7060070 ↗
3. Takano, A., Yoshino, K., Fukushima, Y., Kitamura, R., Funami, Y., Takahashi, K., Takahashi, A., Kunihiro, Y., Miyake, M., and Masai, T. (2024). System Design and Launch of a Hybrid Rocket with a Star-Fractal Swirl Fuel Grain Toward an Altitude of 15 km. Appl. Sci., 14.10.20944/preprints202405.2012.v1 ↗
4. Li, W., Li, W., He, Y., and Liang, G. (2022). Reverse Design of Solid Propellant Grain for a Performance-Matching Goal: Shape Optimization via Evolutionary Neural Network. Aerospace, 9.10.3390/aerospace9100552 ↗
5. Cha, J., and de Oliveira, É.J. (2022). Performance Comparison of Control Strategies for a Variable-Thrust Solid-Propellant Rocket Motor. Aerospace, 9.10.3390/aerospace9060325 ↗
6. Adair, D., Nagimova, A., and Jaeger, M. (2020). Effect of Thrust on the Structural Vibrations of a Nonuniform Slender Rocket. Math. Comput. Appl., 25.10.3390/mca25020029 ↗
7. Wu, Q., and Ren, Q. (2024). Tuning the Ballistic Performance of a Single-Burning-Rate Grain Solid Rocket Motor via New Discontinuous Embedded Metal Wires. Aerospace, 11.10.3390/aerospace11040308 ↗
8. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (2008). Evaluation of Measurement Data—Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Meas-453 Urement, International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM). BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, 454 IUPAP, and OIML, JCGM 100:2008, GUM 1995 with minor corrections.
9. A Ground Test Rocket Thrust Measurement System
10. Rezende, R.N., Alves, L.R., Mishra, A., Shukla, H., Varshney, H., Dhawan, H., Kapoor, S., Jain, U., and Mendonsa, R. (2021, January 9–11). Designing a Thrust Vector Test Stand for the TurboRocket. Proceedings of the AIAA Propulsion and Energy 2021 Forum, Virtual Event.10.2514/6.2021-3350 ↗
11. Jain, U., Shukla, H., Kapoor, S., Pandey, A., and Nirwal, H. (2020, January 24–28). Design and Analysis of 2-Axis Rocket Motor Stand for Thrust Vectoring. Proceedings of the AIAA Propulsion and Energy 2020 Forum, Virtual Event.10.2514/6.2020-3920 ↗
12. Shukla, H., Jain, U., and Kumar, D. (2022). Preliminary Design Approach for Sub-Scale Rocket Motor Thrust Stand. Recent Advances in Mechanical Engineering: Select Proceedings of ERCAM 2021, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-981-19-1388-4_1 ↗
13. Roberts, J., Lewis, J., Glicken, D., Morin, R., Mancini, J., and Haas, D. (1985, January 8–11). Engine Thrust Measurement Uncertainty. Proceedings of the 21st Joint Propulsion Conference, Monterey, CA, USA.10.2514/6.1985-1404 ↗
14. Uncertainty Analysis of Rocket Motor Thrust Measurements with Correlated Biases10.1016/0019-0578(95)00016-S ↗
15. Hysteresis Effects on Thrust Measurement and Its Uncertainty10.2514/2.6135 ↗
16. Static Firing Tests of Solid Propellant Rocket Motors: Uncertainty Levels of Thrust Measurements10.1590/jatm.v14.1270 ↗
17. Davidian, K.J., Dieck, R.H., and Chuang, I. (1987, January 5–9). A Detailed Description of the Uncertainty Analysis for High Area Ratio Rocket Nozzle Tests at the NASA Lewis Research Center. Proceedings of the 24th JANNAF Combustion Meeting, Monterey, CA, USA.
18. The Evaluation of Expanded Uncertainty of Measurement Results in Direct Measurements Using the LabVIEW Environment
19. Canale, R.P., and Chapra, S.C. (2014). Numerical Methods for Engineers, McGraw-Hill Education.
20. (2012). Parâmetros de Desempenho Propulsivo de Motor-Foguete a Propelente Sólido—Curvas Típicas de Leitura e Interpretação (Standard No. ABNT NBR 8167).