Dual Mobility Arthroplasty Versus Suspension Tenoplasty for Treatment of Trapezio–Metacarpal Joint Arthritis: A Clinical Trial

Trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis (TMJ OA) is a progressive condition, particularly affecting postmenopausal women. Various surgical techniques have been proposed, but the optimal approach remains debated. This clinical study compares the clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes of two surgical treatments: suspension tenoplasty using the flexor carpi radialis tendon (Altissimi technique, AST) and a dual-mobility prosthesis. The main complications associated with these procedures include postoperative pain, De Quervain’s syndrome, radial nerve injuries, and prosthetic component mobilization. In prosthetic arthroplasty, the most common complication is component mobilization (8%), while in tenoplasty, postoperative pain is the most frequent (15%). A total of 36 patients were randomized into two groups: 18 patients underwent AST (Group A), and 18 received trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty (Group B). Functional outcomes were assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Visual Analogue Score (VAS), and Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Range of motion (ROM), Kapandji score, pulp pinch strength, hand grip strength (Jamar dynamometer), and radiological maintenance of the trapezial space (step-off measurement) were also evaluated. Both procedures resulted in significant pain reduction (VAS, p < 0.05) and functional improvement (DASH, MHQ, p < 0.05). ROM increased significantly in both groups. The Kapandji scores improved from 4.0 ± 1.1 to 9.2 ± 1.2 (Group A) and 4.3 ± 0.8 to 7.8 ± 1.4 (Group B) (p < 0.05). Group B grip strength results showed a greater increase in hand grip strength than Group A (p = 0.23). The radiographic step-off showed slight proximal migration of the first metacarpal in Group A, whereas Group B maintained joint height. No implant loosening or major complications were reported in either group. Both suspension tenoplasty and dual-mobility arthroplasty are effective in TMJ OA. AST ensures joint stability with minimal radiographic changes, whereas TJA provides superior grip strength and ROM recovery. The absence of major complications suggests that TJA is a safe alternative to AST, but its higher cost and potential for implant-related complications must be considered.