journal article·2025-03-25Open access

A Proposal for Rapid Assessment of Long-Distance Oil and Gas Pipelines After Earthquakes

Hongyuan Jing, Liang Huang, Hua Liu, Weijun Jiang, Qinglu Deng, Ruiqing Niu

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 7

Abstract

A substantial proportion of long-distance oil and gas pipelines in China traverse active faults and high-risk areas characterised by intricate topographic and geological environments. These pipelines are susceptible to a range of safety concerns, exacerbated by the increasing frequency of strong earthquakes in recent years. To address this issue, a comprehensive risk investigation framework has been proposed for long-distance oil and gas pipelines following seismic events. This initiative aims to ensure the safety of pipeline transportation. In this paper, the elements of pipeline safety evaluation under the influence of coseismic hazards are first organized, followed by a construction of post-earthquake pipeline safety rapid assessment theoretical framework based on the seismic geological disaster risk evaluation system. Each method in the system is then introduced one by one. Unlike existing studies that predominantly focus on localized fault activity or static risk assessment, our framework introduces three key innovations: (1) a hierarchical integration of multi-source monitoring data (SCADA, UAV-AI, and numerous monitoring devices) into a unified GIS platform, overcoming the fragmentation of existing systems; (2) a dynamic four-step evaluation process (susceptibility → hazard → risk → safety) that incorporates both pre-earthquake geological conditions and post-earthquake real-time triggers (e.g., PGA, rainfall); (3) a novel risk matrix mechanism for pipeline safety, which dynamically updates risk levels based on field monitoring data rather than relying solely on probabilistic models. This study provides a novel theoretical framework for assessing the safety of pipelines after earthquakes, which can provide a timely basis for pipeline management decisions and reduce the potential damage to pipelines caused by earthquakes. It is important to note that this framework is still in a preliminary stage and needs to be continuously deepened and optimised.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Water Systems and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

North Pipeline Company, National Pipeline Network Group, Langfang 065099, China

Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China

Institute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China

School of Future Technology, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China

Funding

“Unveiling and Commanding” Project of PipeChina

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Forecasting China’s natural gas demand based on optimised nonlinear grey models10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.037 ↗
2. Safety and security of oil and gas pipeline transportation: A systematic analysis of research trends and future needs using WoS10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123583 ↗
3. A, F.-Y., Chen, T.H., Yang, C., Wu, Y.F., and Yan, S.Q. (2023). Study on disaster mechanism of oil and gas pipeline oblique crossing landslide. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15043012 ↗
4. New progress in China’s oil and gas pipeline construction in 2021
5. Deng, Q.L. (2017). Evaluation and Control of Geological Hazard Risks of Long-Distance Pipelines, China University of Geosciences Press.
6. He, B., Bai, M., Shi, H., Li, X., Qi, Y., and Li, Y. (2021). Risk assessment of pipeline engineering geological disaster based on GIS and WOE-GA-BP models. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11219919 ↗
7. Consistency of the rapid assessment method for reinforced concrete buildings10.12989/eas.2016.11.5.873 ↗
8. Developing a hierarchical type-2 fuzzy logic model to improve rapid evaluation of earthquake hazard safety of existing building10.1016/j.istruc.2020.09.048 ↗
9. Rapid screening method for the determination of seismic vulnerability assessment of RC building stocks10.1007/s10518-019-00751-9 ↗
10. A review on application of soft computing techniques for the rapid visual safety evaluation and damage classification of existing buildings10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102536 ↗
11. An innovative quantitative analysis methodology for Natech events triggered by earthquakes in chemical tank farms10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104744 ↗
12. Analysis of seismogenic modes of tectonic movement and earthquake events in Yunnan: Based on GNSS time series of strain anomalies
13. GNSS Monitoring of cross fault seismic deformation of China myanmar oil and gas pipeline project
14. Hazards of seismic hazards on long-distance oil and gas pipelines
15. Seismic vulnerability assessment of a typical long-distance oil pipeline
16. Application exploration and implementation of SCADA system in tracking and positioning of gas pipeline cleaner
17. Huang, H., Li, Y., Ma, L., Mao, B., Zhang, L., Yang, J., Wang, H., Sun, Y., Zhao, X., and Lv, M. (2024). New approach to SCADA system screen configuration based on the model of oil and gas pipeline network. EAI Endorsed Trans. Energy Web, 11.10.4108/ew.5247 ↗
18. Application and technology of earthquake monitoring and early-warning for long-distance oil and gas pipeline
19. Mechanical response analysis of discontinuous pipeline under fault movement
20. (2011). Technical Specification for Geological Hazards Risk Management of Oil and Gas Pipeline (Standard No. SY/T 6828-2011).
21. (2021). Specification for Geohazard Prevention of Oil and Gas Pipelines (Standard No. GB/T40702—2021).
22. Seismic vulnerability assessment of mountainous gas pipelines based on improved Borda method and attribute recognition
23. Seismic response analysis of oil and gas pipelines crossing strike-slip faults
24. Does pipelaying method affect the development of pipeline geohazards and maintenance cost? A case study of Zhongxian-Wuhan gas pipeline, China10.1007/s10064-019-01567-2 ↗
25. Near real time prediction of spatial distribution probability of earthquake- induced landslide—Take the Lushan earthquake on June 1, 2022 as an example
26. Characteristics and spatial distribution pattern of Ms 6.8 Luding earthquake occurred on September 5, 2022
27. Research on emergency evaluation of landslides induced by the Luding Ms 6.8 earthquake
28. Earthquake-induced landslides susceptibility assessment: A review of the state-of-the-art10.1016/j.nhres.2022.03.002 ↗
29. Lu, Z., Liu, G., Song, Z., Sun, K., Li, M., Chen, Y., Zhao, X., and Zhang, W. (2024). Advancements in technologies and methodologies of machine learning in landslide susceptibility research: Current trends and future directions. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14219639 ↗
30. Application status and development trend of machine learning models in landslide susceptibility assessment
31. Ren, F., and Isobe, K. (2024). Versatility evaluation of landslide risk with window sizes and sampling techniques based on deep learning. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142210571 ↗
32. Jiang, W., Li, L., and Niu, R. (2025). Impact of non-landslide sample sampling strategies and model selection on landslide susceptibility mapping. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15042132 ↗