journal article·2025-03-17Open access

Design and Comparative Analysis of a Ground-Level Trellising Tool for Greenhouse Tomato Cultivation

Antonio García-Chica, José Luis Torres-Moreno, Antonio Giménez Fernández, Marta Gómez-Galán, Rosa María Chica

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 6

Abstract

Greenhouse cultivation in Almería, Spain, has experienced continuous growth over the last five decades, and this area has established itself as one of Europe’s leading vegetable-producing regions. With 8201 hectares under cultivation, tomatoes are the most important crop, accounting for 63% of the total value of greenhouse tomato production in Spain. The aim of this study is to design and develop a tool that facilitates tomato trellising under greenhouse conditions and allows it to be carried out at the ground level. An operating principle is developed, and a static analysis of the tool is carried out. Time, costs, and risk of falling from height are compared with traditional methods (ladders, stilts, manual wheeled scaffolding, and motorized scaffolding). The tool incorporates a telescopic carbon fiber mast, a direct-current motor, and electromagnets. The results indicate that the tool is the second fastest method (4′38″) and has the second lowest cost (EUR 8026.93). It is concluded that it is a viable option for trellising, since it eliminates the risk of falling from height while maintaining competitive times and reasonable costs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Engineering, University of Almería, Ctra. Sacramento, s/n, La Cañada, 04120 Almería, Spain

Department of Engineering, Centro Mixto CIESOL, ceiA3, University of Almería, Ctra. Sacramento, s/n, La Cañada, 04120 Almería, Spain

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación (MAPA) (2024, September 19). HORTALIZAS: Balance de campaña 2021/22 y Previsiones 2022/23. Available online: https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/agricultura/temas/producciones-agricolas/balancecampana2021-22perspectivascampana2022-23hortalizas_tcm30-635291.pdf.
2. Cajamar (2024, September 19). Análisis de la Campaña Hortofrutícola de Almería. Campaña 2021/2022. Available online: https://publicacionescajamar.es/series-tematicas/informes-coyuntura-analisis-de-campana/analisis-de-la-campana-hortofruticola-de-almeria-campana-2021-2022/.
3. Junta de Andalucía (2024, September 20). Caracterización del Sector Agrario y Pesquero de Andalucía 2023. Ed: Consejería de Agricultura, Pesca, Agua y Desarrollo Rural. Junta de Andalucía. Available online: https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/sites/default/files/2024-04/Caracterizaci%C3%B3n%20Sector%20Agrario%20y%20Pesquero%20de%20Andaluc%C3%ADa%202023%20_0.pdf.
4. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación (MAPA) (2024, September 20). ANÁLISIS CAMPAÑA 2022/23 DE HORTALIZAS DE INVERNADERO. Available online: https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/agricultura/temas/producciones-agricolas/analisishortalizasinvernaderobalancecampana2022_23yprevisiones2023_248noviembre2023_tcm30-665839.pdf.
5. Valera, D.L., Ureña, L.J.B., Aiz, F.D.M., and Martínez, A. (2014). Los invernaderos de Almería: Análisis de su tecnología y rentabilidad, Cajamar Caja Rural.
6. Camacho-Ferre, F. (2004). Técnicas de Producción de Cultivos Protegidos (Tomo II), Cajamar.
7. López-Marín, J., Gálvez, A., del Amor, F.M., Piñero, M.C., and Brotons-Martínez, J.M. (2022). The Cost-Benefits and Risks of Using Raffia Made of Biodegradable Polymers: The Case of Pepper and Tomato Production in Greenhouses. Horticulturae, 8.10.3390/horticulturae8020133 ↗
8. Ergonomic evaluation, with the RULA method, of greenhouse tasks of trellising crops
9. Accidents in the greenhouse-construction industry of SE Spain10.1016/j.apergo.2011.03.007 ↗
10. Gázquez, J.C., Meca, D.E., Baeza, E., Pérez, C., García, R., and López, J.C. (2012). Evaluación de Tres Sistemas de Guiado para Tomate en Invernadero en Clima Cálido: Descuelgue Tradicional, Actas Hortic. Tradicional Intensivo y Perchas (Tipo Holandés).
11. European Patent Application (2024, September 26). Tutoring System for Greenhouse Cultivation. Available online: https://data.epo.org/publication-server/rest/v1.0/publication-dates/20161221/patents/EP3106026NWA1/document.pdf.
12. Oliveira, L.F.P., Moreira, A.P., and Silva, M.F. (2021). Advances in Agriculture Robotics: A State-of-the-Art Review and Challenges Ahead. Robotics, 10.10.3390/robotics10020052 ↗
13. Ma, Y., Feng, Q., Sun, Y., Guo, X., Zhang, W., Wang, B., and Chen, L. (2024). Optimized Design of Robotic Arm for Tomato Branch Pruning in Greenhouses. Agriculture, 14.10.3390/agriculture14030359 ↗
14. Grimstad, L., Le, T.D., and From, J. (2018, January 1–5). A Novel Autonomous Robot for Greenhouse Applications. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Madrid, Spain.10.1109/IROS.2018.8594233 ↗
15. Vrochidou, E., Tsakalidou, V.N., Kalathas, I., Gkrimpizis, T., Pachidis, T., and Kaburlasos, V.G. (2022). An Overview of End Effectors in Agricultural Robotic Harvesting Systems. Agriculture, 12.10.3390/agriculture12081240 ↗
16. Greenhouse microclimatic environment controlled by a mobile measuring station
17. Garro, R., Ordinez, L., and Alimenti, O. (2011, January 7–11). Design Patterns for Cyber-Physical Systems: The Case of a Robotic Greenhouse. Proceedings of the 2011 Brazilian Symposium on Computing System Engineering, Florianopolis, Brazil.10.1109/SBESC.2011.10 ↗
18. Garro, R., Orozco, J., Ordinez, L., and Santos, R. (2014, January 11–13). Estrategias de diseño basadas en patrones de un subsistema de movimiento para un robot pulverizador. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Biennial Congress of Argentina (ARGENCON), Bariloche, Argentina.10.1109/ARGENCON.2014.6868527 ↗
19. The autonomous mobile robot AURORA for greenhouse operation10.1109/100.556479 ↗
20. Navigation Techniques for Mobile Robots in Greenhouses10.13031/2013.26324 ↗
21. Sanchez-Hermosilla, J., Rodriguez, F., Gonzalez, R., Luis, J., and Berenguel, M. (2010). A Mechatronic Description of an Autonomous Mobile Robot for Agricultural Tasks in Greenhouses. Mobile Robots Navigation, InTech.10.5772/9003 ↗
22. Robotics in greenhouses. Scoping review10.1016/j.compag.2024.108750 ↗
23. Falling from a height injuries in Agriculture: A 8-year experience with 173 samples
24. Musculoskeletal disorders of agricultural workers in the greenhouses of Almeria (Southeast Spain)10.1016/j.ssci.2018.05.023 ↗
25. Gómez-Galán, M., González-Parra, J.M., Pérez-Alonso, J., Golasi, I., and Callejón-Ferre, Á.J. (2019). Forced Postures in Courgette Greenhouse Workers. Agronomy, 9.10.3390/agronomy9050253 ↗
26. Junta de Andalucía (2025, January 05). Estadística de accidents de trabajo en Andalucía. Instituto de Estadística y Cartografía de Andalucía. Available online: https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/institutodeestadisticaycartografia/badea/informe/anual?idNode=10302.
27. Wang, H., Zhao, W., Sun, W., Liu, X., Shi, R., Zhang, H., Chen, P., and Gao, K. (2024). The Design and Experimentation of a Wheeled-Chassis Potato Combine Harvester with Integrated Bagging and Ton Bag-Lifting Systems. Agriculture, 14.10.3390/agriculture14091461 ↗
28. An open-source tool for path synthesis of four-bar mechanisms10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104604 ↗
29. INSST (2024, October 02). Instituto Nacional de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo. Evaluación de riesgos laborales. Available online: https://www.insst.es/documents/94886/96076/Evaluacion_riesgos.pdf/1371c8cb-7321-48c0-880b-611f6f380c1d.
30. Ashby, M.F. (2012). Materials and the Environment: Eco-Informed Material Choice, Elsevier. [3rd ed.].10.1016/B978-0-12-385971-6.00010-5 ↗
31. Assessment of perceived traumatic injury hazards during drywall taping and sanding10.1016/S0169-8141(99)00049-9 ↗
32. Effects of foot placement on postural stability of construction workers on stilts10.1016/j.apergo.2008.08.003 ↗
33. Kinematics and kinetics of gait on stilts: Identification of risk factors associated with construction stilt use10.1080/00140130801961885 ↗
34. Analysis of Musculoskeletal Loadings in Lower Limbs During Stilts Walking in Occupational Activity10.1007/s10439-009-9674-5 ↗
35. Work-related ladder fall fractures: Identification and diagnosis validation using narrative text10.1016/j.aap.2006.04.008 ↗
36. Occupational accidents due to stepladders in Japan: Analysis of industry and injured characteristics10.1016/j.promfg.2015.11.003 ↗
37. Is Renovation Riskier Than New Construction? An Observational Comparison of Risk Factors for Stepladder-Related Falls10.1002/ajim.20956 ↗
38. Slip, trip and fall injuries in potato, sugar beet and open field vegetable production in Finland10.1080/00140130802277562 ↗
39. Accidental injuries in agriculture in the UK10.1093/occmed/52.8.461 ↗
40. Effectiveness of Participatory Training for Prevention of Slips, Trips, and Falls: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Corn Farmers in Thailand10.1177/10105395241265542 ↗
41. Risk Factors for Occupational Falls among Middle-aged and Elderly Farm Workers in Nan Province, Thailand10.1080/1059924X.2022.2040071 ↗
42. Bicycle helmet use to reduce the impact of head injuries in ladder users10.1111/ans.13447 ↗
43. Blach, W., Dobosz, D., Gasienica-Walczak, B., Grants, J., and Litwiniuk, A. (2021). Falls Are the Leading Cause of Injuries among Farmers-Limitations of Practicing Judo in Preventing These Incidents. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11167324 ↗
44. International Labour Office (ILO) (2024, November 28). Safety and Health in Agriculture. Available online: https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_dialogue/@sector/documents/normativeinstrument/wcms_161135.pdf.
45. Parmar, R.S., Kamani, G.J., and Amin, B.A. (2022). Analysis of factorial experiments for agricultural research using digital tool. Gujarat J. Ext. Educ., 33.10.56572/gjoee.2022.33.1.0030 ↗