journal article·2025-03-14Open access

Fiber Sensing in the 6G Era: Vision Transformers for ϕ-OTDR-Based Road-Traffic Monitoring

Robson A. Colares, Leticia Rittner, Evandro Conforti, Darli A. A. Mello

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 6

Abstract

This article adds to the emergent body of research that examines the potential of 6G as a platform that can combine wired and wireless sensing modalities. We apply vision transformers (ViTs) in a distributed fiber-optic sensing system to evaluate road traffic parameters in smart cities. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are also assessed for benchmarking. The experimental setup is based on a direct-detection phase-sensitive optical time-domain reflectometer (ϕ-OTDR) implemented using a narrow linewidth source. The monitored fibers are buried on the university campus, creating a smart city environment. Backscattered traces are consolidated into space–time matrices, illustrating traffic patterns and enabling analysis through image processing algorithms. The ground truth is established by traffic parameters obtained by processing video camera images monitoring the same street using the YOLOv8 model. The results indicate that ViTs outperform CNNs for estimating the number of vehicles and the mean vehicle speed. While a ViT necessitates a significantly larger number of parameters, its complexity is similar to that of a CNN when considering multiply–accumulate operations and random access memory usage. The processed dataset has been made publicly available for benchmarking.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies · Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors · Optical Wireless Communication Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Communications (DECOM), School of Electrical and Computer Engineering (FEEC), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Av. Albert Einstein 400, Campinas 13083-852, Brazil

Department of Computer Engineering and Industrial Automation (DCA), School of Electrical and Computer Engineering (FEEC), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Av. Albert Einstein 400, Campinas 13083-852, Brazil

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) · Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) · Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. The Roadmap to 6G: AI Empowered Wireless Networks10.1109/MCOM.2019.1900271 ↗
2. Wymeersch, H., Shrestha, D., de Lima, C.M., Yajnanarayana, V., Richerzhagen, B., Keskin, M.F., Schindhelm, K., Ramirez, A., Wolfgang, A., and de Guzman, M.F. (2021, January 13–16). Integration of Communication and Sensing in 6G: A Joint Industrial and Academic Perspective. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 32nd Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), Helsinki, Finland.10.1109/PIMRC50174.2021.9569364 ↗
3. Joint Design of Communication and Sensing for Beyond 5G and 6G Systems10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3059488 ↗
4. Integrated Sensing and Communications: Toward Dual-Functional Wireless Networks for 6G and Beyond10.1109/JSAC.2022.3156632 ↗
5. Boffi, P., Ferrario, M., Luch, I.D., Rizzelli, G., and Gaudino, R. (2022, January 16–19). Optical sensing in urban areas by deployed telecommunication fiber networks. Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling (ONDM), Warsaw, Poland.10.23919/ONDM54585.2022.9782848 ↗
6. Mello, D.A.A., Mayer, K.S., Escallón-Portilla, A.F., Arantes, D.S., Pinto, R.P., and Rothenberg, C.E. (2023, January 5–9). When Digital Twins Meet Optical Networks Operations. Proceedings of the 2023 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC), San Diego, CA, USA.10.23919/OFC49934.2023.10117208 ↗
7. Aono, Y., Ip, E., and Ji, P. (2020, January 8–12). More than Communications: Environment Monitoring Using Existing Optical Fiber Network Infrastructure. Proceedings of the Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2020, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1364/OFC.2020.W3G.1 ↗
8. Xia, T.J., Wellbrock, G.A., Huang, M.F., Salemi, M., Chen, Y., Wang, T., and Aono, Y. (2020, January 8–12). First Proof That Geographic Location on Deployed Fiber Cable Can Be Determined by Using OTDR Distance Based on Distributed Fiber Optical Sensing Technology. Proceedings of the Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2020, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1364/OFC.2020.Th3A.5 ↗
9. Connected OFCity: Technology innovations for a smart city project [Invited]10.1364/JOCN.9.00A245 ↗
10. Recent advances in phase-sensitive optical time domain reflectometry (ϕ-OTDR)10.1007/s13320-021-0619-4 ↗
11. The Role of Advanced Sensing in Smart Cities10.3390/s130100393 ↗
12. Jia, Z., Campos, L.A., Xu, M., Zhang, H., Gonzalez-Herraez, M., Martins, H.F., and Zhan, Z. (2021, January 6–11). Experimental Coexistence Investigation of Distributed Acoustic Sensing and Coherent Communication Systems. Proceedings of the 2021 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC), San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1364/OFC.2021.Th4F.4 ↗
13. Distributed fiber-optic intrusion sensor system10.1109/JLT.2005.849924 ↗
14. Pipeline corrosion and leakage monitoring based on the distributed optical fiber sensing technology10.1016/j.measurement.2018.03.018 ↗
15. Distributed acoustic sensing for seismic activity monitoring10.1063/1.5139602 ↗
16. Single-shot distributed temperature and strain tracking using direct detection phase-sensitive OTDR with chirped pulses10.1364/OE.24.013121 ↗
17. Real Field Deployment of a Smart Fiber-Optic Surveillance System for Pipeline Integrity Threat Detection: Architectural Issues and Blind Field Test Results10.1109/JLT.2017.2780126 ↗
18. Distributed sensing of microseisms and teleseisms with submarine dark fibers10.1038/s41467-019-13262-7 ↗
19. Real-Time Position and Speed Monitoring of Trains Using Phase-Sensitive OTDR10.1109/LPT.2014.2346760 ↗
20. Xia, T.J., Wellbrock, G.A., Huang, M.F., Han, S., Chen, Y., Salemi, M., Ji, P.N., Wang, T., and Aono, Y. (2021, January 6–11). Field Trial of Abnormal Activity Detection and Threat Level Assessment with Fiber Optic Sensing for Telecom Infrastructure Protection. Proceedings of the 2021 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC), San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1364/OFC.2021.Th4H.3 ↗
21. Evaluating Phase Errors in Phase-Sensitive Optical Time-Domain Reflectometry Based on I/Q Demodulation
22. Impact-Based Feature Extraction Utilizing Differential Signals of Phase-Sensitive OTDR10.1109/JLT.2020.2966413 ↗
23. A direct detection fiber optic distributed acoustic sensor with a mean SNR of 7.3 dB at 102.7 km10.1109/JPHOT.2019.2948211 ↗
24. Machine learning methods for identification and classification of events in ϕ-OTDR systems: A review10.1364/AO.444811 ↗
25. First Field Trial of Distributed Fiber Optical Sensing and High-Speed Communication Over an Operational Telecom Network10.1109/JLT.2019.2935422 ↗
26. Automatic traffic monitoring by ϕ-OTDR data and Hough transform in a real-field environment10.1364/AO.422385 ↗
27. Overcoming Challenges of Distributed Fiber-Optic Sensing for Highway Traffic Monitoring10.1177/0361198120960134 ↗
28. Wang, T., Huang, M.F., Han, S., and Narisetty, C. (2022, January 6–10). Employing Fiber Sensing and On-Premise AI Solutions for Cable Safety Protection over Telecom Infrastructure. Proceedings of the 2022 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC), San Diego, CA, USA.10.1364/OFC.2022.Th3G.1 ↗
29. Advances in phase-sensitive optical time-domain reflectometry10.29026/oea.2022.200078 ↗
30. Recent Advancements in Rayleigh Scattering-Based Distributed Fiber Sensors10.34133/2021/8696571 ↗
31. Distributed fiber sensor network using telecom cables as sensing media: Technology advancements and applications [Invited]10.1364/JOCN.439175 ↗
32. Colares, R.A., Conforti, E., Rittner, L., and Mello, D.A. (2024, January 14–18). Field Trial of an ML-Assisted Phase-Sensitive OTDR for Traffic Monitoring in Smart Cities [invited]. Proceedings of the 2024 24th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON), Bari, Italy.10.1109/ICTON62926.2024.10647594 ↗
33. Sandler, M., Howard, A., Zhu, M., Zhmoginov, A., and Chen, L.C. (2018, January 18–22). MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474 ↗
34. Colares, R.A., Huancachoque, L., Conforti, E., and Mello, D.A. (2024, January 11–13). Demonstration of ϕ-OTDR-based DFOS Assisted by YOLOv8 for Traffic Monitoring in Smart Cities. Proceedings of the 2024 SBFoton International Optics and Photonics Conference (SBFoton IOPC), Salvador, Brazil.10.1109/SBFotonIOPC62248.2024.10813552 ↗
35. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, L., and Polosukhin, I. (2017, January 4–9). Attention is all you need. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS’17, Red Hook, NY, USA.
36. Laser Linewidth and Phase Noise Evaluation Using Heterodyne Offline Signal Processing10.1109/JLT.2016.2597217 ↗
37. Jocher, G., Chaurasia, A., and Qiu, J. (2024, February 01). Ultralytics YOLOv8. Available online: https://docs.ultralytics.com/models/yolov8/.
38. Colares, R.A., Conforti, E., and Mello, D.A.A. (2024, February 01). Dataset Related to Paper “Fiber Sensing in the 6G Era: Vision Transformers for ϕ-OTDR-Based Road-Traffic Monitoring”. Available online: https://redu.unicamp.br/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.25824/redu/VLHHAW.