journal article·2025-03-12Open access

The Rebound Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

Antonio Fanelli, Ugo Giovanni Falagario, Marco Finati, Francesco Guzzi, Antonella Ninivaggi, Luca Montrone, Angelo Cormio, Oscar Selvaggio, Pasquale Annese, Gian Maria Busetto, Carlo Bettocchi, Francesca Sanguedolce, Luigi Cormio, Giuseppe Carrieri

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 6

Abstract

Background and aim: The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on delayed screening and consequent diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) is yet to be defined. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on PCa diagnosis by comparing the number of prostate biopsies performed and observing the PCa detection rate during pre-COVID, COVID and post-COVID periods. Materials and Methods: A prospectively maintained database was queried to identify patients who received prostate biopsy between January 2018 and December 2022. The cohort was stratified into pre-COVID, COVID and post-COVID periods based on Italian government regulations. The primary study outcomes were the number of biopsies performed and the detection rate of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) in each period. Changes in the median number of biopsies were evaluated using the Kruskal–Wallis test, whereas changes in csPCa were evaluated using the chi-square test. The loess function depicted changes in the number of prostate biopsies and the csPCa detection rate across the study period. Results: Overall, 2502 patients were included; their median age was 68 (62–74) years. The median number of biopsies performed in the pre-COVID, COVID and post-COVID period was 46 (43–56), 39 (27–43) and 46 (40–58), respectively (p = 0.02). The most significant decrease in the number of biopsies performed was observed during the peak of the pandemic, from March to May 2020. The detection rate of csPCa in the three periods was 37%, 34% and 39%, respectively (p = 0.01). The loess function demonstrated a rebound effect on the number of biopsies performed and consequent csPCa diagnosed starting from November 2020, while the same effect was not observed for non-cs PCa. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic caused a significant decrease in the number of prostate biopsies performed and csPCa diagnosed. We demonstrated a rebound effect on csPCa diagnosis after the pandemic. Future studies with longer follow-ups are needed to address the effects of the observed grade migration on the burden of PCa treatment and oncological outcomes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: COVID-19 and healthcare impacts · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Climate Change and Health Impacts

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico Foggia, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy

Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden

Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti Di Ancona, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy

Department of Urology, IRCCS “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza” Hospital, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy

Pathology Unit, Policlinico Foggia, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy

Department of Urology, Bonomo Teaching Hospital, 76123 Andria, Italy

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Remote Consultations: Experiences of UK Patients with Prostate Cancer during the COVID-19 Pandemic10.2217/fon-2022-0613 ↗
2. Urology in the time of corona10.1038/s41585-020-0312-1 ↗
3. Applicability of COVID-19 Pandemic Recommendations for Urology Practice: Data from Three Major Italian Hot Spots (BreBeMi)10.1016/j.euros.2021.01.012 ↗
4. Association of the COVID-19 Pandemic With Rates of Prostate Cancer Biopsies and Diagnoses in Black vs White US Veterans10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.0467 ↗
5. Cancer management during the COVID-19 world pandemic10.1007/s00262-023-03524-1 ↗
6. Undiagnosed Cancer Cases in the US During the First 10 Months of the COVID-19 Pandemic10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.6969 ↗
7. What Experts Think About Prostate Cancer Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Report from the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 202110.1016/j.eururo.2022.02.010 ↗
8. Clinical stage and grade migration of localized prostate cancer at diagnosis during the past decade
9. Population-based Organised Prostate Cancer Testing: Results from the First Invitation of 50-year-old Men10.1016/j.eururo.2023.11.013 ↗
10. Early Detection of Prostate Cancer in the European Union: Combining Forces with PRAISE-U10.1016/j.eururo.2023.08.002 ↗
11. Assessment of Changes in Cancer Treatment During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the US10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.4513 ↗
12. WHO Declares End of COVID-19 Global Health Emergency
13. Fifteen-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer10.1056/NEJMoa2214122 ↗
14. (2024, September 23). Gazzetta Ufficiale. Available online: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2020/03/09/20A01558/sg#.
15. The dramatic COVID 19 outbreak in Italy is responsible of a huge drop of urological surgical activity: A multicenter observational study10.1111/bju.15149 ↗
16. Noninfiltrative anesthesia for transrectal prostate biopsy: A randomized prospective study comparing lidocaine-prilocaine cream and lidocaine-ketorolac gel
17. Prostate cancer detection rates in different biopsy schemes. Which cores for which patients?10.1007/s00345-012-0989-8 ↗
18. The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Con-sensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma10.1097/PAS.0000000000001678 ↗
19. COVID-19 pandemic impact on screening and di-agnosis of prostate cancer: A systematic review
20. Impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on prostate cancer care in the Netherlands10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100553 ↗
21. How has the COVID-19 pandemic influenced prostate cancer?—A tertiary single-centre analysis of oncological results, diagnosis and treatment times10.21037/tau-22-360 ↗
22. Zaliznyak, M., Horwitz, R., Davaro, F., Rosen, G.H., Murray, K.S., and Hamilton, Z. (2023). Increasing surgical wait time does not increase the risk of node positive prostate cancer: Implications for surgical planning during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Front. Urol., 3.10.3389/fruro.2023.1132139 ↗
23. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on prostate cancer outcomes at an uro-oncology referral center10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2022.0393 ↗
24. Organized prostate cancer screening program: A proposal from the Italian Society of Urology (SIU)10.23736/S2724-6051.24.06117-2 ↗