Quantitative Analysis of Risk Coupling Effects in Highway Accidents: A Focus on Primary and Secondary Accidents
Source abstract
Abstract
Analyzing risk coupling effects in highway accidents provides guidance for preventive decoupling measures. Existing studies rarely explore the differences in risk coupling between primary accidents (PA) and secondary accidents (SA) from a quantitative perspective. This study proposes a method to measure the risk coupling effects of PA and SA on highways and examine their differences. A domain-pretrained named entity recognition (NER) model, TRBERT-BiLSTM-CRF, is proposed to identify risk factors and risk types based on 431 accident investigation reports published by the emergency management departments in China. The N-K model was applied to calculate the risk coupling values for different coupling scenarios in PA and SA, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed on them. Finally, the differences between PA and SA were compared, and targeted accident prevention recommendations are provided. The results showed that our proposed NER model achieved the best macro-F1 score in traffic risk entity recognition. Most of the risk coupling values increased with the number of risk types, but the coupling value of the five factors in the SA was lower than that of the four factors, indicating that the risk types do not always superimpose each other in complex scenarios. Moreover, there were significant differences in the risk coupling mechanisms between PA and SA. The results suggest that the likelihood of PA and SA occurrences should be reduced through standardized vehicle inspections and flexible control measures, respectively, thereby enhancing highway safety.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Occupational Health and Safety Research · Risk and Safety Analysis · Traffic and Road Safety
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Electronics and Control Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
School of Information Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
Guangzhou Road Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 511431, China
Shaanxi Transportation Holding Group, Xi’an 723003, China
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. Risk Factors in Highway Traffic Accidents: A Case Control Study10.1016/S0001-4575(99)00116-5 ↗
2. Li, L., Tan, E., Gao, P., and Jin, Y. (2024). Enhancing Concurrent Emergency Response: Joint Scheduling of Emergency Vehicles on Freeways with Tailored Heuristic. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14177433 ↗
3. Risk Coupling Analysis of Road Transportation Accidents of Hazardous Materials in Complicated Maritime Environment10.1016/j.ress.2022.108891 ↗
4. Methodological Evolution and Frontiers of Identifying, Modeling and Preventing Secondary Crashes on Highways10.1016/j.aap.2018.04.001 ↗
5. Modeling When and Where a Secondary Accident Occurs10.1016/j.aap.2018.01.024 ↗
6. Sustainability Risk in Supply Bases: The Role of Complexity and Coupling10.1016/j.tre.2020.102175 ↗
7. Towards an Analysis Framework for Operational Risk Coupling Mode: A Case from MASS Navigating in Restricted Waters10.1016/j.ress.2024.110176 ↗
8. Risk Management in a Dynamic Society: A Modelling Problem10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00052-0 ↗
9. Applying Reason: The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS)
10. A New Accident Model for Engineering Safer Systems10.1016/S0925-7535(03)00047-X ↗
11. The Hybrid Systems Method Integrating STAMP and HFACS for the Causal Analysis of the Road Traffic Accident10.1080/00140139.2023.2270783 ↗
12. A Network Accident Causation Model for Monitoring Railway Safety10.1016/j.ssci.2018.06.008 ↗
13. New Systems-Based Method to Conduct Analysis of Road Traffic Accidents10.1016/j.trf.2018.01.019 ↗
14. Using Actor Maps and AcciMaps for Road Safety Investigations: Development of Taxonomies and Meta-Analyses10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105975 ↗
15. Crash Contributing Factors and Patterns Associated with Fatal Truck-Involved Crashes in Bangladesh: Findings from the Text Mining Approach10.1177/03611981231209031 ↗
16. Text as Data: Narrative Mining of Non-Collision Injury Incidents on Public Buses by Structural Topic Modeling10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100981 ↗
17. Application of Text Mining and Coupling Theory to Depth Cognition of Aviation Safety Risk10.1016/j.ress.2024.110032 ↗
18. Characterizing Accident Narratives with Word Embeddings: Improving Accuracy, Richness, and Generalizability10.1016/j.jsr.2021.12.024 ↗
19. Construction Accident Narrative Classification: An Evaluation of Text Mining Techniques10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.026 ↗
20. From Free-Text to Structured Safety Management: Introduction of a Semi-Automated Classification Method of Railway Hazard Reports to Elements on a Bow-Tie Diagram10.1016/j.ssci.2018.03.011 ↗
21. Leveraging Autonomous Vehicles Crash Narratives to Understand the Patterns of Parking-Related Crashes
22. Mining Construction Accident Reports via Unsupervised NLP and Accimap for Systemic Risk Analysis10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105343 ↗
23. Chain of Events Model for Safety Management: Data Analytics Approach10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.044 ↗
24. Analysis of Motorcyclists Crash Severity Using Cluster Correspondence and Hierarchical Binary Logit Models10.1016/j.multra.2025.100197 ↗
25. Das, S., Dzinyela, R., Liu, J., Dadashova, B., and Silvestri-Dobrovolny, C. (2024). Understanding Patterns of Factor Influences in Motorcycle Crashes with Fixed Objects. J. Transp. Saf. Secur., 1–27.10.1080/19439962.2024.2429077 ↗
26. Using Text Mining and Multilevel Association Rules to Process and Analyze Incident Reports in China10.1016/j.aap.2023.107224 ↗
27. An Improved Text Mining Approach to Extract Safety Risk Factors from Construction Accident Reports10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105216 ↗
28. Using Text Mining and Bayesian Network to Identify Key Risk Factors for Safety Accidents in Metro Construction10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-14114 ↗
29. Text Mining of Accident Reports Using Semi-Supervised Keyword Extraction and Topic Modeling10.1016/j.psep.2021.09.022 ↗
30. Hazard Analysis: A Deep Learning and Text Mining Framework for Accident Prevention10.1016/j.aei.2020.101152 ↗
31. Identification of Accident-Injury Type and Bodypart Factors from Construction Accident Reports: A Graph-Based Deep Learning Framework10.1016/j.aei.2022.101752 ↗
32. A Survey on Deep Learning for Named Entity Recognition10.1109/TKDE.2020.2981314 ↗
33. Enhancing Aviation Safety and Mitigating Accidents: A Study on Aviation Safety Hazard Identification10.1016/j.aei.2024.102732 ↗
34. MAKG: A Maritime Accident Knowledge Graph for Intelligent Accident Analysis and Management10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119280 ↗
35. A Deep Learning Approach to Recognizing Fine-Grained Expressway Location Reference from Unstructured Texts in Chinese10.1080/13658816.2023.2301316 ↗
36. A Text Mining-Based Approach for Understanding Chinese Railway Incidents Caused by Electromagnetic Interference10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105598 ↗
37. Effective Vector Representation for the Korean Named-Entity Recognition10.1016/j.patrec.2018.11.019 ↗
38. Using Text Mining to Establish Knowledge Graph from Accident/Incident Reports in Risk Assessment10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117991 ↗
39. Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., and Toutanova, K. (2019, January 2–7). BERT: Pre-Training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding 2019. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), Minneapolis, MN, USA.
40. ATBBC: Named Entity Recognition in Emergency Domains Based on Joint BERT-BILSTM-CRF Adversarial Training10.3233/JIFS-232385 ↗
41. Analysis of Coupled Risk of Air Traffic Safety Based on N-K Model
42. Risk Coupling Analysis of Subsea Blowout Accidents Based on Dynamic Bayesian Network and NK Model10.1016/j.ress.2021.108160 ↗
43. Risk Assessment of Hazmat Road Transportation Accidents before, during, and after the Accident Using Bayesian Network10.1016/j.psep.2024.08.062 ↗
44. Mining the Accident Causes of Railway Dangerous Goods Transportation: A Logistics-DT-TFP Based Approach10.1016/j.aap.2023.107421 ↗
45. Integration of the BBN-NK-Boltzmann Model of Tunnel Fire Network Scenarios with Coupled Forward and Reverse Rendition Analysis10.1016/j.ress.2023.109546 ↗
46. Research on Coupling Mechanism of Intelligent Ship Navigation Risk Factors Based on N-K Model10.1007/s00773-022-00919-0 ↗
47. Study on the Coupling Effect of Road Traffic Risk Causes under Different Driving Ages
48. Multi-Dimensional Coupling Study on Traffic Accident Risk of Highway in Mountainous Areas
49. Jia, C., Shi, Y., Yang, Q., and Zhang, Y. (2020, January 16–20). Entity Enhanced BERT Pre-Training for Chinese NER. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Online.10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.518 ↗
50. Zhang, S., Zheng, D., Hu, X., and Yang, M. (November, January 30). Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory Networks for Relation Classification. Proceedings of the 29th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, Shanghai, China.
51. An Introduction to Conditional Random Fields10.1561/2200000013 ↗
52. Huang, Z., Xu, W., and Yu, K. (2015). Bidirectional LSTM-CRF Models for Sequence Tagging 2015. arXiv.
53. Research on Formation Mechanism of Coupled Disaster Risk
54. Risk Coupling Evaluation of Undersea Tunnel Traffic Accident Based on Catastrophe Theory
55. The NK Model of Rugged Fitness Landscapes and Its Application to Maturation of the Immune Response10.1016/S0022-5193(89)80019-0 ↗
56. Analysis of Coupling of Highway Traffic Risks in Geological and Meteorological Environment of Plateau Regions
57. Analyzing Ship Collision Accidents in China: A Framework Based on the N-K Model and Bayesian Networks10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118619 ↗
58. NK Model as a Representation of Innovative Search10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.009 ↗
59. Woolson, R.F. (2005). Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.10.1002/0470011815.b2a15177 ↗
60. An Attention-Based BiLSTM-CRF Approach to Document-Level Chemical Named Entity Recognition10.1093/bioinformatics/btx761 ↗
61. Xu, Y., and Zhang, L. (2024, January 16). Drilling Risk Named Entity Recognition Based on RoBERTa-BiLSTM-CRF. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Machine Vision, Automatic Identification, and Detection (MVAID 2024), Kunming, China.10.1117/12.3035586 ↗
62. A Methodology to Identify and Assess High-Risk Causes for Electrical Personal Accidents Based on Directed Weighted CN10.1016/j.ress.2022.109027 ↗
63. Risk Coupling Analysis under Accident Scenario Evolution: A Methodological Construct and Application10.1111/risa.14237 ↗
64. Analysis and Measurement of Multifactor Risk in Underground Coal Mine Accidents Based on Coupling Theory10.1016/j.ress.2021.107433 ↗