Developing New Design Procedure for Bridge Construction Equipment Based on Advanced Structural Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Bridge construction equipment (BCE) is crucial for efficiently executing large-scale infrastructure projects, particularly those involving continuous long-span bridges. Current BCE technologies, like the Overhead Movable Scaffolding System (OMSS), are often chosen for their high efficiency and cost-effective reusability. However, the lack of a standardised design framework tailored to Australian conditions complicates the design process, potentially leading to increased inefficiencies and safety concerns. This research project seeks to establish a novel design procedure for BCE, using the OMSS in Australia as a case study. The project adopts parametric design techniques using Rhinoceros (Rhino) 3D and Grasshopper to create a three-dimensional linear model. This model undergoes initial structural optimisation with Karamba3D. Subsequent advanced analyses include linear static design assessments performed in Strand7, a sophisticated finite element analysis software. The evaluation primarily utilises Australian standards to assess performance against various load types and combinations, such as permanent (dead), imposed (live), and wind loads. The structural integrity, including maximum displacement, axial forces, and bending moments, is manually verified against the analysis outcomes. The results confirm that the OMSS model adheres to ultimate and serviceability limit state requirements, affirming the effectiveness of the proposed design procedure for BCE. The research culminates in a design procedure flowchart and further suggests future research directions to refine BCE design methodologies for complex bridge construction scenarios.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · BIM and Construction Integration · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2008, Australia
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Department of Infrastructure and Transport (2013). High Speed Rail Study: Phase 2 Report, AECOM.
2. Fatigue design and prevention in movable scaffolding systems
3. Resat, O., and Faham, T. (2021). Temporary works in construction of bridges near third party assets. Structural Integrity and Failure, IntechOpen. Chapter 6.
4. Bowstring movable scaffolding system with organic prestressing system (OPS)
5. (2017). Bridge design. Part 1: Scope and General Principles (Standard No. AS 5100.1: 2017).
6. (2002). Standards New Zealand. Structural Design Actions. Part 0: General Principles (Standard No. AS/NZS 1170.0: 2002).
7. (2020). Steel Structures (Standard No. AS 4100:2020).
8. The evolution of movable scaffolding systems and their application in the construction of the Spanish high-speed train line
9. André, A. (2004). Estudo Experimental da Aplicação de Pré-Esforço Orgânico Num Cimbre Autolançável em Modelo Reduzido. [Master’s Thesis, University of Porto].
10. Movable scaffolding systems10.2749/101686611X13131377725442 ↗
11. Pacheco, P. (1999). Pré-Esforço Orgânico: Um Exemplo de Sistema Efector. [Ph.D Thesis, University of Porto].
12. Organic prestressing: An example of an effector system
13. Organic prestressing10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:3(400) ↗
14. Fatigue failure of high strength steels under extreme vibrations of military standards: A comparative study10.1007/s12206-024-0204-z ↗
15. Experimental study of a launching gantry reduced scale model strengthened with organic prestressing10.2749/101686606777962774 ↗
16. Pacheco, P., Adao Da Fonseca, A., André, A., Guerra, A., Freitas, F., Oliveira, T., Pinto, C., and Mendes, J. (2004, January 3–4). Strengthening by organic prestressing of existing launching gantries in the construction of high speed railway bridge decks. Proceedings of the Workshop Bridges for High-Speed Railways, Porto, Portugal.
17. A scaffolding system strengthened with organic prestressing: The first of a new generation of structures10.2749/101686607782359092 ↗
18. A new concept of overhead movable scaffolding system for bridge construction
19. Sustainability in bridge construction processes10.1007/s10098-009-0223-6 ↗
20. Technical challenges of large movable scaffolding systems10.2749/101686611X13131377725640 ↗
21. André, A., Ferraz, I., Coelho, H., Fernandes, J., and Pacheco, P. (2020, January 2–4). New span range on modular bridges: The arch relevance. Proceedings of the ARCH 2019, Porto, Portugal.10.1007/978-3-030-29227-0_103 ↗
22. Automation robustness of scaffolding systems strengthened with organic prestressing10.1016/j.autcon.2009.09.001 ↗
23. Pacheco, P., Coelho, H., Resende, A., Carvalho, D., and Soares, I. (2015, January 1–3). High productivity in bridge construction: The OPS effect. Proceedings of the Multi-Span Large Bridges: International Conference on Multi-Span Large Bridges, Porto, Portugal.
24. New frontiers in multi-span prestressed concrete deck construction: A case study10.1080/10168664.2020.1738906 ↗
25. Gülkan, P., Caner, A., and Memisoglu Apaydin, N. (2021). Bridge engineering optimization opportunities through integrated solutions: Design–constructive method. Developments in International Bridge Engineering: Selected Papers from Istanbul Bridge Conference 2018, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-59169-4 ↗
26. Resende, A., Magalhães, F., and Pacheco, P. (2025, January 1–5). Monitoring Wind and Vibrations at Movable Scaffolding System. Proceedings of the International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent Infrastructure: Transferring Research into Practice, SHMII, Graz, Austria.
27. Continuous monitoring of a large movable scaffolding under operation10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105084 ↗
28. Design basis of movable scaffolding systems following American and European code provisions and recommendations10.7250/bjrbe.2021-16.528 ↗
29. Members of IABSE Working Group 6 (2018). Bridge Deck Erection Equipment, ICE Publishing.
30. Bridge Construction Equipment: An Overview of the Existing Design Guidance10.2749/101686612X13363869853419 ↗
31. Rosignoli, M. (2013). Bridge Construction Equipment, ICE Publishing.10.1680/bce.58088 ↗
32. Harridge, S., and Meyer, M. (2018). Equipment design. Bridge Deck Erection Equipment: A Best Practice Guide, ICE Publishing.
33. Harridge, S., and Meyer, M. (2018). Movable scaffolding systems. Bridge Deck Erection Equipment: A Best Practice Guide, ICE Publishing.
34. Rosignoli, M. (2013). Design loads and load combinations. Bridge Construction Equipment, ICE Publishing.10.1680/bce.58088 ↗
35. Australian Building Codes Board (2015). Temporary Structures, Australian Building Codes Board.
36. National Construction Code (2022). NCC 2022 Volume One-Building Code of Australia Class 2 to 9 Buildings, National Construction Code.
37. NSW Parliamentary Counsel (2024). State environmental planning policy (exempt and complying development codes) 2008. Division 3 Temporary Uses and Structures Exempt Development Code, NSW Parliamentary Counsel.
38. Design of concrete-filled steel tubular members according to the Australian Standard AS 5100 Model and Calibration10.1080/13287982.2008.11464998 ↗
39. Seismic and Wind Load Considerations for Temporary Structures10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2008)13:3(128) ↗
40. Design wind speeds for temporary structures
41. Establishing compliance of steel mill products: A comparison between Australian steel standards and the corresponding European standards
42. Resende, A., Coelho, H., and Pacheco, P. (2015, January 1–3). Preliminary assessment of wind actions in large span MSS. Proceedings of the Multi-Span Large Bridges: International Conference on Multi-Span Large Bridges, Porto, Portugal.
43. Creation of robust design alternatives for temporary construction in value engineering10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001057 ↗
44. Improved construction of concrete viaducts with movable scaffolding systems in Spain10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000831 ↗
45. Beale, R., and André, J. (2017). Design Solutions and Innovations in Temporary Structures, IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-5225-2199-0 ↗
46. A movable scaffolding system for the Vistula River in Warsaw
47. Okere, G., and Chris Souder, M.S. (2018, January 24–27). Board 49: Making the case for temporary structures as a required course and recommending an instructional design. Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposiiton, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
48. Temporary structures in construction: USA practices10.2749/101686604777963649 ↗
49. Gust Buffeting of Slender Structures and Structural Elements: Simplified Formulas for Design Calculations and Code Provisions10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001949 ↗
50. A comparative study on newly emerging type of formwork systems with conventional type of form work systems10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.090 ↗
51. Investigation of the spatial coherence function of wind loads on lattice frame structures10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104675 ↗
52. Analysis methods of irregular high-rise buildings subjected to seismic loads10.1007/s42417-022-00636-3 ↗
53. The development and application of an optimization tool in industrial design10.1007/s12008-020-00679-4 ↗
54. Form finding and analysis of tension structures by dynamic relaxation10.1260/0266351991494722 ↗
55. Saliklis, E. (2019). Structures: A Geometric Approach: Graphical Statics and Analysis, Springer Nature. [1st ed.].10.1007/978-3-319-98746-0 ↗
56. Thrust network analysis: A new methodology for three-dimensional equilibrium
57. Maxwell’s reciprocal diagrams and discrete Michell frames10.1007/s00158-013-0910-0 ↗
58. Akbarzadeh, M. (2016). 3D Graphical Statics Using Reciprocal Polyhedral Diagrams. [Ph.D Thesis, ETH Zürich].
59. Algebraic 3D graphic statics: Reciprocal constructions10.1016/j.cad.2018.08.003 ↗
60. Parametric design of steel structures: Fundamentals of parametric design using Grasshopper10.1002/stco.202100011 ↗
61. Sharbaf, A., Bemanian, M., Daneshjoo, K., and Shakib, H. (2021). Masonry dome behavior under gravity loads based on the support condition by considering variable curves and thicknesses. Buildings, 11.10.3390/buildings11060241 ↗
62. Structural form-finding of bending components in buildings by using parametric tools and principal stress lines10.1016/j.foar.2021.11.004 ↗
63. Estrada Meza, M.G., González Meza, E., Chi Pool, D.A., and McNamara Trujillo, J.S. (2022). Design Exploration of Bamboo Shells Structures by Using Parametric Tools. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12157522 ↗
64. Optimum design of steel truss arch bridges using a hybrid genetic algorithm10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.03.007 ↗
65. Conceptual design of AM components using layout and geometry optimization10.1016/j.camwa.2018.07.012 ↗
66. Shape and size optimization of truss structures by Chaos game optimization considering frequency constraints10.1016/j.jare.2022.01.002 ↗
67. A hybrid intelligent genetic algorithm for truss optimization based on deep neutral network10.1016/j.swevo.2022.101120 ↗
68. On the use of mechanics-informed models to structural engineering systems: Application of graph neural networks for structural analysis10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105712 ↗
69. Topology optimization of truss structures considering local buckling stability10.1016/j.compstruc.2024.107273 ↗
70. Modeling of retrofitted steel transmission towers10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.04.005 ↗
71. Full dynamic model of Golden Gate Bridge10.1063/1.4961103 ↗
72. Blasting response of the Eiffel Tower10.1063/1.4961101 ↗
73. Transient dynamic analysis of the Bao’An Stadium10.1063/1.4961099 ↗
74. Behaviour of pultruded GFRP truss system connected using through-bolt with mechanical insert10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.052 ↗
75. Study on the safety of the concrete pouring process for the main truss arch structure in a long-span concrete-filled steel tube arch bridge10.1080/15376494.2019.1601309 ↗
76. Fragility analysis of structures subjected to seismic excitation: A state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.istruc.2022.04.023 ↗
77. Tahmasebinia, F., Yip, C.S., Lok, C.F., Sun, Y., Wu, J., Sepasgozar, S.M.E., and Marroquin, F.A. (2022). Dynamic behavior of the composite steel–concrete beam floor systems under free and forced vibration. Buildings, 12.10.3390/buildings12030320 ↗
78. Tahmasebinia, F., Chen, E., Huang, A., and Li, J. (2023). Designing Lightweight Stadium Roofing Structures Based on Advanced Analysis Methods. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15043612 ↗
79. Criteria development for sustainable construction manufacturing in Construction Industry 4.010.1108/CI-10-2019-0103 ↗
80. Tahmasebinia, F., Jabbari, A.A., and Skrzypkowski, K. (2023). The application of finite element simulation and 3D printing in structural design within construction Industry 4.0. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13063929 ↗
81. Tahmasebinia, F., Jiang, S., Shirowzhan, S., Mann, L., and Sepasgozar, S.M.E. (2023). Exploring the integration of architectural design and advanced structural analysis for steel–glass structures: A comparative study of different case scenarios. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13061369 ↗
82. Tahmasebinia, F., Wang, Y., Wu, S., Ho, J., Shen, W., Ma, H., Sepasgozar, S.M.E., and Marroquin, F.A. (2021). Advanced structural analysis of innovative steel–glass structures with respect to the architectural design. Buildings, 11.10.3390/buildings11050208 ↗
83. Tahmasebinia, F., Zeng, W., Macaraniag, B., and Skrzypkowski, K. (2024). Numerical design and analysis of advanced roof systems in architecture with environmentally friendly low-carbon materials. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14052041 ↗
84. John, S.K., Cascardi, A., Verre, S., and Nadir, Y. (2025). RC-columns subjected to lateral cyclic force with different FRCM-strengthening schemes: Experimental and numerical investigation. Bull. Earthq. Eng.10.1007/s10518-025-02100-5 ↗
85. State-of-the-art AI-based computational analysis in civil engineering
86. Physics-informed machine learning and its structural integrity applications: State of the art10.1098/rsta.2022.0406 ↗
87. Chen, Y., Lu, Y., and Liu, T. (2024). Seismic Performance of Precast Steel Beam-Column Joint with Bolted Connection. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14082588 ↗
88. Ferreira, A., Lima, B., Lopes, F., and Pacheco, P. (2015, January 1–3). Comparative study of prestressing consumptions in 7 different constructive methods for 75 m multi-span box girders. Proceedings of the Multi-Span Large Bridges: International Conference on Multi-Span Large Bridges, Porto, Portugal.
89. (2017). Bridge Design. Part 2: Design Loads (Standard No. AS 5100.2: 2017).
90. (2017). Bridge Design. Part 5: Concrete (Standard No. AS 5100.5: 2017).
91. Rutten, D. (2010, January 18–21). Evolutionary Principles applied to Problem Solving. Proceedings of the AAG10 Conference, Vienna, Austria.
92. (2016). Standards New Zealand. Structural steel. Part 1: Hot-rolled bars and sections (Standard No. AS/NZS 3679.1: 2016).
93. (2016). Standards New Zealand. Structural steel. Part 2: Welded I sections (Standard No. AS/NZS 3679.2: 2016).
94. Application of Modular Construction in High-Rise Buildings10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000057 ↗
95. Kim, S., and Kim, S.-A. (2020). Framework for Designing Sustainable Structures through Steel Beam Reuse. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12229494 ↗
96. InfraBuild (2019). Hot Rolled and Structual Steel Products, InfraBuild.
97. OneSteel (2014). Hot Rolled and Structual Steel Products, OneSteel.
98. (2021). Standards New Zealand. Structural Design Actions. Part 2: Wind Actions (Standard No. AS/NZS 1170.2: 2021).
99. (2021). Cranes-Wind Load Assessment (ISO 4302:2016, MOD) (Standard No. AS 5222: 2021).
100. (2019). Standards New Zealand. Scaffolding. Part 1: General Requirements (Standard No. AS/NZS 1576.1: 2019).