journal article·2025-03-10Open access

Research on Grading Evaluation of Coal and Gas Dynamic Disasters Based on Fuzzy Mathematics

Hong Ding, Guangcai Wen, Qingming Long, Jiaokun Wu, Yong Chen

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 6

Abstract

As mining depths increase, the highly metamorphosed anthracite in Southwest China progressively develops into a complex dynamic disaster influenced by both in situ stress and gas pressure. By utilizing characteristic indicators of mining-induced stress and gas dynamic emissions, a grading evaluation method for coal and gas dynamic disasters (CGDDs) based on fuzzy mathematics l theory is proposed and validated at the No. 1 Well of the Yuwang Coal Mine. The results indicate that the acceleration of microseismic wave velocity and the increase in the wave velocity anomaly coefficient are indicative of a more pronounced stress concentration. The working face exhibits distinct gradations of stress concentrations, categorized as weak, moderate, and strong. Moreover, the increase in microseismic wave velocity and the anomaly coefficient further confirm the intensity of the stress concentrations. Gas dynamic emissions show a clear correlation with the drill cuttings gas desorption indicator (K1 value) and drill cuttings volume (S value). Characteristic indicators A, B, and D are suitable for assessing the risk of CGDDs in the working face. For the application of individual indicators for classifying the CGDD risk at different distances from the crosscut (128 m, 247.5 m, 299.4 m, and 435 m) in the 1010201-working face, contradictory classification results were observed. However, the classification results derived from the fuzzy mathematics method were consistent with the findings of field investigations. As the working face advanced through the pre-concentrated stress zone, significant changes were observed in both the source wave velocity and wave velocity anomaly coefficient. Concurrently, gas emissions displayed a distinct pattern of fluctuation characterized by increases and decreases. The consistency between the periodic weighting of the working face, the gas emission, the drill cuttings gas desorption indicator, and the stress field inversion result further validates the classification outcomes. These research results can provide theoretical support for the monitoring of CGDDs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geoscience and Mining Technology · Safety and Risk Management · Coal Properties and Utilization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China

State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Prevention and Control, Chongqing 400037, China

Gas Branch, Chongqing Research Institute Co., Ltd., China Coal Technology and Engineering Group, Chongqing 400037, China

College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China

School of Resource & Environment and Safety Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, China

Funding

Science and Technology Major Project of Guizhou Province · Key Science and Technology Project of Ministry of Emergency Management of the People’s Republic of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China · Science and Technology Innovation and Venture Capital Special Projects of TIANDI Science & Technology Co., Ltd.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Research progress of mining response and disaster prevention and control in deep coal mines
2. China Coal Industry Association (2024, June 27). Coal Industry Economic Operation Report 2023. Available online: https://finance.sina.com.cn/tech/roll/2024-06-27/doc-incacees9540966.shtml.
3. State Mine Safety Supervision Bureau (2023, March 22). Emergency Circular on Further Strengthening the Prevention and Control of Coal Mine Gas, Available online: https://www.chinamine-safety.gov.cn/zfxxgk/fdzdgknr/tzgg/202303/t20230322_445420.shtml.
4. Analysis of the statistical rules and dynamic effect characteristics of coal and gas outburst accidents in China in recent 10 years
5. Research progress and prospect on theory and technology for coal and gas outburst control and protection in China
6. A Coupled geomechanical-reservoir model for the modelling of coal and gas outbursts10.1016/S1571-9960(04)80110-1 ↗
7. Coal and gas outburst simulation system based on csiro model
8. Excitation and occurrence conditions for coal and gas outburst
9. Mechanical mechanism of coal and gas outburst process
10. Key structural body theory of coal and gas outburst
11. Prediction of coal and gas outburst by using gas emission dynamic index
12. KJ4 monitoring system for coal mine safety production
13. A review on prediction and early warning methods of coal and gas outburst
14. Acoustic emission monitoring technology for coal and gas outburst10.1002/ese3.289 ↗
15. Coal and gas outburst simulation experiment reacted by microseismical monitoring
16. Microseismical dynamic response and characteristic analysis of coal and gas outburst experiment. Chin
17. Ban, Q. (2015). Study on Precursor Rule of AE-EMR-GAS and Early-warning Technology of Outburst in Yizhong Coal Mine. [Master’s Thesis, China University of Mining & Technology].
18. Acoustic mission and electromagnetic radiation synchronized monitoring technology and early warning application for coal and rock dynamic disaster
19. Study on precursor characteristics and comprehensive early warning of coal and gas outburst risk in tunneling working face
20. Study on real time dynamic monitoring and early warning technology of regional and local outburst danger
21. Research on time series characteristics of gas concentration at working face and application of them to early warning
22. Fuzzy risk assessment for mechanized underground coal mines in Turkey10.1080/10803548.2018.1426804 ↗
23. Stanic, N., Gomilanovic, M., Markovic, P., Krzanovic, D., Doderovic, A., and Stepanovic, S.A. (2024). Model for Determining the Dependability of Continuous Subsystems in Coal Mines Using the Fuzzy Logic Approach. Appl. Sci., 14.10.20944/preprints202407.1952.v1 ↗
24. Zhang, R., Tian, D., Wang, H., Kang, X., Wang, G., and Xu, L. (2023). Risk Assessment of Compound Dynamic Disaster Based on AHP-EWM. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app131810137 ↗
25. Fuzzy FMEA for the safety risk analysis of underground coal mining (a case study in Iran)10.1080/25726668.2022.2051273 ↗
26. Comprehensive analysis of the mining accident forecasting and risk assessment methodologies: Case study–Stanterg Mine10.33271/mining18.02.011 ↗
27. Development of a heuristic method for solving the problem of control of reforming technology process in a fuzzy environment10.51301/vest.su.2021.i2.31 ↗
28. Mathematical optimization strategy for online scheduling of complex manufacturing systems based on thermal energy optimization and fuzzy mathematical model10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102949 ↗
29. Meng, X., Ye, D., Pan, Y., Zhang, T., Liang, L., Liu, Y., and Ma, Y. (2024). Optimization of Not-from-Concentrate Goji Juice Processing Using Fuzzy Mathematics and Response Surface Methodology and Its Quality Assessment. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14188393 ↗
30. Technology of microseismical dynamic monitoring on coal and gas outburst-prone zone
31. Big data monitoring and early warning cloud platform for coal mine gas disaster risk and potential danger and its application