Multi-Channel Speech Enhancement Using Labelled Random Finite Sets and a Neural Beamformer in Cocktail Party Scenario
Source abstract
Abstract
In this research, a multi-channel target speech enhancement scheme is proposed that is based on deep learning (DL) architecture and assisted by multi-source tracking using a labeled random finite set (RFS) framework. A neural network based on minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) beamformer is considered as the beamformer of choice, where a residual dense convolutional graph-U-Net is applied in a generative adversarial network (GAN) setting to model the beamformer for target speech enhancement under reverberant conditions involving multiple moving speech sources. The input dataset for this neural architecture is constructed by applying multi-source tracking using multi-sensor generalized labeled multi-Bernoulli (MS-GLMB) filtering, which belongs to the labeled RFS framework, to obtain estimations of the sources’ positions and the associated labels (corresponding to each source) at each time frame with high accuracy under the effect of undesirable factors like reverberation and background noise. The tracked sources’ positions and associated labels help to correctly discriminate the target source from the interferers across all time frames and generate time–frequency (T-F) masks corresponding to the target source from the output of a time-varying, minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) beamformer. These T-F masks constitute the target label set used to train the proposed deep neural architecture to perform target speech enhancement. The exploitation of MS-GLMB filtering and a time-varying MVDR beamformer help in providing the spatial information of the sources, in addition to the spectral information, within the neural speech enhancement framework during the training phase. Moreover, the application of the GAN framework takes advantage of adversarial optimization as an alternative to maximum likelihood (ML)-based frameworks, which further boosts the performance of target speech enhancement under reverberant conditions. The computer simulations demonstrate that the proposed approach leads to better target speech enhancement performance compared with existing state-of-the-art DL-based methodologies which do not incorporate the labeled RFS-based approach, something which is evident from the 75% ESTOI and PESQ of 2.70 achieved by the proposed approach as compared with the 46.74% ESTOI and PESQ of 1.84 achieved by Mask-MVDR with self-attention mechanism at a reverberation time (RT60) of 550 ms.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Speech and Audio Processing · Infant Health and Development · Speech Recognition and Synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical Engineering, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8370451, Chile
Department of Electricity, Universidad Tecnológica Metropolitana, Av. José Pedro Alessandri 1242, Santiago 7800002, Chile
Department of Computing and Industries, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca 3466706, Chile
Faculty of Science, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí 78295, Mexico
Funding
ANID/FONDECYT Iniciación · Competition for Research Regular Projects, year 2021, Universidad Tecnológica Metropolitana
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. A Unifying View on Blind Source Separation of Convolutive Mixtures Based on Independent Component Analysis10.1109/TSP.2023.3255552 ↗
2. Convolutive Transfer Function-Based Multichannel Nonnegative Matrix Factorization for Overdetermined Blind Source Separation10.1109/TASLP.2022.3145304 ↗
3. Batch and Adaptive PARAFAC-based Blind Separation of Convolutive Speech Mixtures10.1109/TASL.2009.2031694 ↗
4. A consolidated perspective on multimicrophone speech enhancement and source separation10.1109/TASLP.2016.2647702 ↗
5. Combined LCMV-TRINICON Beamforming for Separating Multiple Speech Sources in Noisy and Reverberant Environments
6. Blind Separation for Multiple Moving Sources with Labeled Random Finite Sets10.1109/TASLP.2021.3087003 ↗
7. Morgan, J.P. (2017). Time-Frequency Masking Performance for Improved Intelligibility with Microphone Arrays. [Master’s Thesis, University of Kentucky].
8. Mask-Based Neural Beamforming for Moving Speakers with Self-Attention-Based Tracking10.1109/TASLP.2023.3237172 ↗
9. Tammen, M., Ochiai, T., Delcroix, M., Nakatani, T., Araki, S., and Doclo, S. (2024). Array Geometry-Robust Attention-Based Neural Beamformer for Moving Speakers. arXiv.10.21437/Interspeech.2024-2427 ↗
10. Wang, Y., Politis, A., and Virtanen, T. (2024, January 14–19). Attention-Driven Multichannel Speech Enhancement in Moving Sound Source Scenarios. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Seoul, Republic of Korea.10.1109/ICASSP48485.2024.10448177 ↗
11. Xu, Y., Yu, M., Zhang, S., Chen, L., Weng, C., Liu, J., and Yu, D. (2020, January 25–29). Neural Spatio-Temporal Beamformer for Target Speech Separation. Proceedings of the INTERSPEECH 2020, Shanghai, China.10.21437/Interspeech.2020-1458 ↗
12. Xu, Y., Zhang, Z., Yu, M., Zhang, S.-X., and Yu, D. (September, January 30). Generalized Spatio-Temporal RNN Beamformer for Target Speech Separation. Proceedings of the INTERSPEECH 2021, Brno, Czech Republic.10.21437/Interspeech.2021-430 ↗
13. Guo, A., Wu, J., Gao, P., Zhu, W., Guo, Q., Gao, D., and Wang, Y. (November, January 31). Enhanced Neural Beamformer with Spatial Information for Target Speech Extraction. Proceedings of the 2023 Asia Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC) 2023, Taipei, Taiwan.10.1109/APSIPAASC58517.2023.10317293 ↗
14. Neural spectrospatial filtering10.1109/TASLP.2022.3145319 ↗
15. Combining spectral and spatial features for deep learning based blind speaker separation10.1109/TASLP.2018.2881912 ↗
16. Zhang, Z., Xu, Y., Yu, M., Zhang, S.-X., Chen, L., and Yu, D. (2021, January 6–11). ADLMVDR: All deep learning MVDR beamformer for target speech separation. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1109/ICASSP39728.2021.9413594 ↗
17. Gu, R., Chen, L., Zhang, S.-X., Zheng, J., Xu, Y., Yu, M., Su, D., Zou, Y., and Yu, D. (2019, January 15–19). Neural spatial filter: Target speaker speech separation assisted with directional information. Proceedings of the INTERSPEECH 2019, Graz, Austria.10.21437/Interspeech.2019-2266 ↗
18. Conv-TasNet: Surpassing ideal time-frequency magnitude masking for speech separation10.1109/TASLP.2019.2915167 ↗
19. Tolooshams, B., Giri, R., Song, A.H., Isik, U., and Krishnaswamy, A. (2020, January 4–8). Channel-Attention Dense U-Net for Multichannel Speech Enhancement. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Barcelona, Spain.10.1109/ICASSP40776.2020.9053989 ↗
20. Nair, A.A., Reiter, A., Zheng, C., and Nayar, S. (2019, January 21–25). Audiovisual Zooming: What You See Is What You Hear. Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Nice, France.10.1145/3343031.3351010 ↗
21. Soni, M.H., Shah, N., and Patil, H.A. (2018, January 15–20). Time-Frequency Masking-Based Speech Enhancement Using Generative Adversarial Network. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Calgary, AB, Canada.10.1109/ICASSP.2018.8462068 ↗
22. Baby, D. (2020). iSEGAN: Improved Speech Enhancement Generative Adversarial Networks. arXiv.
23. Michelsanti, D., and Tan, Z.-H. (2017, January 20–24). Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks for Speech Enhancement and Noise-Robust Speaker Verification. Proceedings of the INTERSPEECH 2017, Stockholm, Sweden.10.21437/Interspeech.2017-1620 ↗
24. Pascual, S., Bonafonte, A., and Serrà, J. (2017). SEGAN: Speech Enhancement Generative Adversarial Network. arXiv.10.21437/Interspeech.2017-1428 ↗
25. Speech Enhancement via Residual Dense Generative Adversarial Network
26. Datta, J., Firoozabadi, A.D., Zabala-Blanco, D., Soria, F.R.C., Adams, M., and Perez, C. (2023, January 27–29). Multi-channel Target Speech Enhancement using Labeled Random Finite Sets and Deep Learning under Reverberant Environments. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 5th Eurasia Conference on IOT, Communication and Engineering (ECICE), Yunlin, Taiwan.10.1109/ECICE59523.2023.10382971 ↗
27. Multi-channel speech enhancement using a minimum variance distortionless response beamformer based on graph convolutional network
28. A Novel Approach to Multi-Channel Speech Enhancement Based on Graph Neural Networks10.1109/TASLP.2024.3352259 ↗
29. Tzirakis, P., Kumar, A., and Donley, J. (2021, January 6–11). Multi-channel speech enhancement using graph neural networks. Proceedings of 2021 the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1109/ICASSP39728.2021.9413955 ↗
30. Zhang, C., and Xiang, P. (2022, January 18–22). Single-channel speech enhancement using Graph Fourier Transform. Proceedings of the INTERSPEECH 2022, Incheon, Republic of Korea.10.21437/Interspeech.2022-740 ↗
31. Audio-Visual Based Online Multi-Source Separation10.1109/TASLP.2022.3156758 ↗
32. Multi-sensor multi-object tracking with the generalized labeled multi-bernoulli filter10.1109/TSP.2019.2946023 ↗
33. Thomas, R.W., and Larson, J.D. (2021, January 6–13). Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Generalized Labeled Multi-Bernoulli Multi-Target Tracking. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Aerospace Conference (50100), Big Sky, MT, USA.10.1109/AERO50100.2021.9438310 ↗
34. Multi-level graph convolutional recurrent neural network for semantic image segmentation10.1007/s11235-021-00769-y ↗
35. Goodfellow, I.J., Abadie, J.P., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Farley, D.W., Ozair, S., Courville, A., and Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative Adversarial Networks. arXiv.
36. Recent Progress on Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs): A Survey10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2905015 ↗
37. Graph Signal Processing: Foundations and Emerging Directions [From the Guest Editors]10.1109/MSP.2020.3020715 ↗
38. Li, G., Muller, M., Thabet, A., and Ghanem, B. DeepGCNs: Can GCNs go as deep as CNNs? In Proceedings of IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 27 October–2 November 2019.10.1109/ICCV.2019.00936 ↗
39. Seo, Y., Defferrard, M., Vandergheynst, P., and Bresson, X. (2016). Structured Sequence Modeling with Graph Convolutional Recurrent Networks. arXiv.
40. Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W., and Frangi, A. (2014). U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015, Proceedings of the MICCAI 2015, Munich, Germany, 5–9 October 2014, Springer. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 9351.10.1007/978-3-319-24571-3 ↗
41. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2015). Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
42. Road Extraction by Deep Residual U-Net10.1109/LGRS.2018.2802944 ↗
43. Yang, X., Li, X., Ye, Y., Zhang, X., Zhang, H., and Huang, X. (2019, January 14–19). Road Detection via Deep Residual Dense U-Net. Proceedings of the 2019 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Budapest, Hungary.10.1109/IJCNN.2019.8851728 ↗
44. Huang, G., Liu, Z., van der Laurens, M., and Weinberger, K.Q. (2017, January 21–26). Densely connected convolutional networks. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Piscataway, NJ, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.243 ↗
45. Datta, J., Adams, M., and Perez, C. (2023, January 27–29). Dense-U-Net assisted Localization of Speech Sources in Motion under Reverberant conditions. Proceedings of the 2023 12th International Conference on Control, Automation and Information Sciences (ICCAIS), Hanoi, Vietnam.10.1109/ICCAIS59597.2023.10382318 ↗
46. Do, H., Silverman, H.F., and Yu, Y. (2007, January 16–20). A real-time SRP-PHAT source location implementation using stochastic region contraction (SRC) on a large-aperture microphone array. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/ICASSP.2007.366631 ↗
47. Paul, D.B., and Baker, J. (1992, January 23–26). The design for the wall street journal-based CSR corpus. Proceedings of the 1992 Workshop on Speech and Natural Language, Harriman, NY, USA.10.3115/1075527.1075614 ↗
48. Panayotov, V., Chen, G., Povey, D., and Khudanpur, S. (2015, January 19–24). Librispeech: An ASR corpus based on public domain audio books. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), South Brisbance, QLD, Australia.10.1109/ICASSP.2015.7178964 ↗
49. Barker, J., Marxer, R., Vincent, E., and Watanabe, S. (2015, January 13–17). The third ‘CHiME’ speech separation and recognition challenge: Dataset, task and baselines. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding (ASRU), Scottsdale, AZ, USA.10.1109/ASRU.2015.7404837 ↗
50. The diverse environments multichannel acoustic noise database: A database of multichannel environmental noise recordings10.1121/1.4806631 ↗
51. Piczak, K.J. (2015, January 26–30). ESC: Dataset for Environmental Sound Classification. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Multimedia, Brisbane, Australia.10.1145/2733373.2806390 ↗
52. An algorithm for predicting the intelligibility of speech masked by modulated noise maskers10.1109/TASLP.2016.2585878 ↗
53. Rix, A.W., Beerends, J.G., Hollier, M.P., and Hekstra, A.P. (2001, January 7–11). Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ)-a new method for speech quality assessment of telephone networks and codecs. Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, Signal Processing, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
54. Le Roux, J., Wisdom, S., Erdogan, H., and Hershey, J.R. SDR–half-baked or well done? In Proceedings of 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, Signal Processing (ICASSP), Brighton, UK, 12–17 May 2019.10.1109/ICASSP.2019.8683855 ↗
55. Lehmann, E.A., Johansson, A.M., and Nordholm, S. (2007, January 21–24). Reverberation-time prediction method for room impulse responses simulated with the image source model. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, New Paltz, NY, USA.10.1109/ASPAA.2007.4392980 ↗
56. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv.
57. Jeub, M., Sch¨afer, M., Kr¨uger, H., Nelke, C., Beaugeant, C., and Vary, P. Do we need dereverberation for hand-held telephony? In Proceedings of 2010 International Congress on Acoustics (ICA), Sydney, Australia, 23–27 August 2010.
58. Rao, W., Fu, Y., Hu, Y., Xu, X., Jv, Y., Han, J., Jiang, Z., Xie, L., Wang, Y., and Watanabe, S. (2021, January 13–17). Conferencingspeech Challenge: Towards Far-Field Multi-Channel Speech Enhancement for Video Conferencing. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASRU), Cartagena, Colombia.10.1109/ASRU51503.2021.9688126 ↗
59. Distributed Microphone Arrays, Emerging Speech and Audio Signal Processing Platforms: A Review10.25046/aj050439 ↗
60. Audhkhasi, K., Georgiou, P.G., and Narayanan, S.S. (2012, January 25–30). Analyzing quality of crowd-sourced speech transcriptions of noisy audio for acoustic model adaptation. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Kyoto, Japan.10.1109/ICASSP.2012.6288829 ↗