journal article·2025-03-04Open access

Space–Time Stress Variations near the East Anatolian Fault Zone and the Triggering Relationship of Earthquakes

Ju Ma, Peicong Wang, Weizhang Liang

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 5

Abstract

Several major earthquakes have taken place near the East Anatolian fault zone (EAFZ) in history. Despite extensive research on the Coulomb stress changes associated with these earthquakes, there remains a paucity of studies examining the spatial and temporal distribution of Coulomb stress near the East Anatolian fault zone over extended periods. This study investigates the changes in Coulomb stress induced by significant earthquakes (≥6 Mw) near the EAFZ from 1986 to 2023. High-stress changes (1.5–2.5 bar) were observed along the fault’s northeastern and southwestern segments, indicating a high likelihood of future seismicity. We also found that the three major earthquakes between 1986 and 2003 had little impact on subsequent major seismic events in the vicinity. However, the 2020 Mw 6.8 earthquake generated a Coulomb stress increment exceeding 0.1 bar, which influenced nearby seismic activity for two years. This suggests that the 2023 major earthquakes were likely facilitated by this stress change. Parameter sensitivity analysis shows fault strikes significantly affect calculations, highlighting the importance of accurate source mechanisms for reliable results. The findings of this study offer critical insights for seismologists and geophysicists aiming to refine earthquake-triggering models and stress transfer mechanisms. Civil engineers and urban planners can utilize the identified high-stress zones to prioritize seismic retrofitting of infrastructure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: earthquake and tectonic studies · Earthquake Detection and Analysis · High-pressure geophysics and materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. Li, S., Wang, X., Tao, T., Zhu, Y., Qu, X., Li, Z., Huang, J., and Song, S. (2023). Source Model of the 2023 Turkey Earthquake Sequence Imaged by Sentinel-1 and GPS Measurements: Implications for Heterogeneous Fault Behavior along the East Anatolian Fault Zone. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15102618 ↗
2. Kinematic Study at the Junction of the East Anatolian Fault and the Dead Sea Fault from GPS Measurements10.1016/j.jog.2012.05.006 ↗
3. GPS Constraints on Continental Deformation in the Africa-Arabia-Eurasia Continental Collision Zone and Implications for the Dynamics of Plate Interactions10.1029/2005JB004051 ↗
4. Kinematics of the East Anatolian Fault Zone between Turkoglu (Kahramanmaras) and Celikhan (Adiyaman), Eastern Turkey10.1186/BF03352645 ↗
5. Disaster and Emergency Management Authorit (2023). 06 Şubat 2023 Pazarcık (Kahramanmaraş) Mw 7.7 ve Elbistan (Kahramanmaraş) Mw 7.6 Depremlerine Iliskin Ön Degerlendirme Raporu, Disaster and Emergency Management Authorit.
6. Barbot, S., Luo, H., Wang, T., Hamiel, Y., Piatibratova, O., Javed, M.T., Braitenberg, C., and Gurbuz, G. (2023). Slip Distribution of the February 6, 2023 Mw 7.8 and Mw 7.6, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey Earthquake Sequence in the East Anatolian Fault Zone. Seismica, 2.10.26443/seismica.v2i3.502 ↗
7. Space-Time Stress Variations on the Palu-Koro Fault Impacting the 2018 Mw 7.5 Palu Earthquake and Its Seismic Hazards10.1029/2020GC009552 ↗
8. Introduction to Special Section: Stress Triggers, Stress Shadows, and Implications for Seismic Hazard10.1029/98JB01576 ↗
9. The Static Stress Change Triggering Model: Constraints from Two Southern California Aftershock Sequences10.1029/98JB00573 ↗
10. Earthquake Triggering by Transient and Static Deformations10.1029/98JB01125 ↗
11. Earthquakes and Friction Laws10.1038/34097 ↗
12. Analysis of Aftershocks on the Basis of Dislocation Theory10.1016/0031-9201(73)90020-4 ↗
13. Off-Fault Aftershock Clusters Caused by Shear Stress Increase?10.1785/BSSA0710051669 ↗
14. The 1979 Homestead Valley Earthquake Sequence, California: Control of Aftershocks and Postseismic Deformation10.1029/JB088iB08p06477 ↗
15. Stress Triggering Effect on the 2022 Honghe MS5.0 Earthquake with Historical Strong Earthquakes10.1016/j.geog.2023.07.008 ↗
16. Change in Failure Stress on the Southern San Andreas Fault System Caused by the 1992 Magnitude = 7.4 Landers Earthquake10.1126/science.258.5086.1328 ↗
17. Fault Interactions and Large Complex Earthquakes in the Los Angeles Area10.1126/science.1090747 ↗
18. Stress Changes along the Sunda Trench Following the 26 December 2004 Sumatra-Andaman and 28 March 2005 Nias Earthquakes10.1029/2005GL024558 ↗
19. Coulomb Stress Evolution along Xianshuihe–Xiaojiang Fault System since 1713 and Its Interaction with Wenchuan Earthquake, May 12, 200810.1016/j.epsl.2013.06.044 ↗
20. Foreshock Triggering of the 1 April 2014 Mw 8.2 Iquique, Chile, Earthquake10.1016/j.epsl.2016.04.020 ↗
21. The Complex Dynamics of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Turkey, Mw 7.8–7.7 Earthquake Doublet10.1126/science.adi0685 ↗
22. Stress Shadow on the Southwest Portion of the Longmen Shan Fault Impacted the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake Rupture10.1029/2018JB015633 ↗
23. What Is Better Than Coulomb Failure Stress? A Ranking of Scalar Static Stress Triggering Mechanisms from 105 Mainshock-Aftershock Pairs10.1002/2017GL075875 ↗
24. Stress Evolution on Major Faults in Tien Shan and Implications for Seismic Hazard10.1016/j.jog.2022.101939 ↗
25. Investigation of Earthquake Sequence and Stress Transfer in the Eastern Anatolia Fault Zone by Coulomb Stress Analysis10.55730/1300-0985.1898 ↗
26. Evaluation of 08 August 2019 Bozkurt (Denizli-Turkey, Mw 6.0) Earthquake in Terms of Strong Ground-Motion Parameters and Coulomb Stress Changes10.1007/s12665-023-11162-0 ↗
27. Machine Learning-Based Seismic Fragility and Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Structures10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107761 ↗
28. Source Process of the 24 January 2020 Mw 6.7 East Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey, Earthquake10.1785/0220200124 ↗
29. Postseismic Deformation Following the Mw 7.2, 23 October 2011 Van Earthquake (Turkey): Evidence for Aseismic Fault Reactivation: October 23, 2011 Van Earthquake (Turkey)10.1002/2014GL059291 ↗
30. The East Anatolian Fault: Geometry, Segmentation and Jog Characteristics10.1144/SP372.14 ↗
31. Stress Inversion of Regional Seismicity in the Sea of Marmara Region, Turkey10.1007/s00024-018-1971-1 ↗
32. Ma, J., Wang, P., Vavryčuk, V., Wu, S., Hou, J., and Qi, Z. (2025). Tectonic Stress Field Related to the Eastern Turkey from 1976 to 2024. J. Seismol.10.1007/s10950-025-10282-3 ↗
33. Supershear Triggering and Cascading Fault Ruptures of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, Earthquake Doublet10.1126/science.adi1519 ↗
34. The Role of Stress Transfer in Rupture Nucleation and Inhibition in the 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, Sequence, and a One-Year Earthquake Forecast10.1785/0220230252 ↗
35. Structural Controls on Fault Slip Models of the 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye Earthquake Doublet with Finite Element Analyses10.1029/2023GL107472 ↗
36. Insights on the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake, Turkey, from InSAR: Fault Locations, Rupture Styles and Induced Deformation10.1093/gji/ggad464 ↗
37. Complex Multi-Fault Rupture and Triggering during the 2023 Earthquake Doublet in Southeastern Türkiye10.1038/s41467-023-41404-5 ↗
38. Complex Rupture Dynamics on an Immature Fault during the 2020 Mw 6.8 Elazığ Earthquake, Turkey10.1038/s43247-020-00038-x ↗
39. Arrest of the Mw 6.8 January 24, 2020 Elaziğ (Turkey) Earthquake by Shallow Fault Creep10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118085 ↗
40. High-Resolution Seismicity Imaging and Early Aftershock Migration of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş (SE Türkiye) MW7.9 & 7.8 Earthquake Doublet10.1016/j.eqs.2023.06.002 ↗
41. Pulse-like Ground Motion Observed during the 6 February 2023 MW7.8 Pazarcık Earthquake (Kahramanmaraş, SE Türkiye)10.1016/j.eqs.2023.05.005 ↗
42. Geometric Controls on Cascading Rupture of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Doublet10.1038/s41561-023-01283-3 ↗
43. New Maps of Global Geological Provinces and Tectonic Plates10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104069 ↗
44. An Updated Digital Model of Plate Boundaries
45. Static Stress Changes and the Triggering of Earthquakes
46. Earthquake Triggering by Static, Dynamic, and Postseismic Stress Transfer10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122505 ↗
47. The Role of Stress Transfer in Earthquake Occurrence10.1038/45144 ↗
48. Influence of Static Stress Changes on Earthquake Locations in Southern California10.1038/375221a0 ↗
49. Suppression of Large Earthquakes by Stress Shadows: A Comparison of Coulomb and Rate-and-State Failure10.1029/98JB00793 ↗
50. Internal Deformation Due to Shear and Tensile Faults in a Half-Space10.1785/BSSA0820021018 ↗
51. Stress Triggering in Thrust and Subduction Earthquakes and Stress Interaction between the Southern San Andreas and Nearby Thrust and Strike-Slip Faults: Stress Triggering and Fault Interaction10.1029/2003JB002607 ↗
52. Forecasting the Evolution of Seismicity in Southern California: Animations Built on Earthquake Stress Transfer10.1029/2004JB003415 ↗
53. An Improved Method for Determining the Regional Stress Tensor Using Earthquake Focal Mechanism Data: Application to the San Fernando Earthquake Sequence10.1029/JB089iB11p09305 ↗
54. Damped Regional-Scale Stress Inversions: Methodology and Examples for Southern California and the Coalinga Aftershock Sequence10.1029/2005JB004144 ↗
55. Stress Tensor Inversion Using Detailed Microearthquake Information and Stability Constraints: Application to Ölfus in Southwest Iceland10.1029/1999JB900111 ↗
56. Use of Focal Mechanisms to Determine Stress: A Control Study10.1029/JB092iB01p00357 ↗
57. Vavryčuk, V. (2022, October 14). Iterative Joint Inversion for Stress and Fault Orientations from Focal Mechanisms|Geophysical Journal International|Oxford Academic. Available online: https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/199/1/69/723251.10.1093/gji/ggu224 ↗
58. The Mechanics of Oblique Slip Faulting10.1017/S0016756800059987 ↗
59. Geometry of Shearing Stress and Relation to Faulting10.1086/625831 ↗
60. Determination of Stress from Slip Data: Faults and Folds10.1029/JB089iB13p11517 ↗
61. Towards Routine Determination of Focal Mechanisms Obtained from First Motion P-Wave Arrivals10.1093/gji/ggx503 ↗
62. The ISC Bulletin as a Comprehensive Source of Earthquake Source Mechanisms10.5194/essd-11-565-2019 ↗
63. Coulomb Stress Transfer and Accumulation on the Sagaing Fault, Myanmar, over the Past 110 Years and Its Implications for Seismic Hazard10.1002/2017GL072770 ↗
64. New Empirical Relationships among Magnitude, Rupture Length, Rupture Width, Rupture Area, and Surface Displacement10.1785/BSSA0840040974 ↗
65. Stein, R.S., Toda, S., Özbakir, A.D., Sevilgen, V., Gonzalez-Huizar, H., Lotto, G., and Sevilgen, S. (2024, May 12). Interactions, Stress Changes, Mysteries, and Partial Forecasts of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, Earthquakes. Available online: https://temblor.net/.
66. Zaccagnino, D., Telesca, L., Tan, O., and Doglioni, C. (2023). Clustering Analysis of Seismicity in the Anatolian Region with Implications for Seismic Hazard. Entropy, 25.10.3390/e25060835 ↗
67. Coulomb Stress Change before and after 24.01.2020 Sivrice (Elazığ) Earthquake (Mw = 6.8) on the East Anatolian Fault Zone10.1007/s12517-021-09080-1 ↗
68. Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 ↗
69. The Generic Mapping Tools Version 610.1029/2019GC008515 ↗