journal article·2025-02-19Open access

Investigating the Effect of Lubricating Oil Volatility and Ash Content on the Emission of Sub-23 nm Particles

Salvatore Lagana, Sebastian A. Pfau, Ephraim Haffner-Staton, Antonino La Rocca, Alasdair Cairns

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 4

Abstract

As the world transitions to decarbonized fuels, understanding the impact of engine oil on emissions remains crucial. Lubricant-derived particulate emissions can influence air quality and regulatory compliance in future transport. Researchers have predominantly focused on transient driving cycles to replicate real-world conditions and capture the full range of particle size. This emphasis has led to a lack of comprehensive data on oil-related particulate emissions during steady-state operations, particularly for particles smaller than 23 nm. This paper addresses this gap as upcoming regulations, such as Euro 7, are expected to impose stricter limits by extending measurement thresholds down to 10 nm. The investigation was conducted on a 1.0 L gasoline direct injection engine, assessing total particulate number (TPN) emissions using three oil formulations: a baseline oil with mid-ash content and mid-volatility, a low-ash and low-volatility oil (LoLo), and a high-ash and high-volatility oil (HiHi). A DMS500, with and without a catalytic stripper, measured particle size distribution and TPN. Two digital filters were applied to obtain particle number (PN) metrics comparable to condensation particle counters: “F1-PN > 23” with d50 = 23 nm and “F3-PN > 10” with d50 = 10 nm. Sub-23 nm particles dominated emissions, with baseline oil generally producing higher PN emissions except at low loads. Using F1-PN > 23, HiHi exhibited higher PN counts across moderate to high speeds, while F3-PN > 10 revealed lower PN emissions for HiHi at specific conditions, excluding 2250 rpm-fast idle. By a weighted arithmetic mean, HiHi’s emissions were 9.7% higher than LoLo with F1-PN > 23 and 3.6% higher with F3-PN > 10. Oil formulation did not influence nucleation mode diameter. A three-way ANOVA demonstrated that load and speed were the predominant factors affecting emissions over the entire testing map; albeit at specific operating conditions the effect of the oil is evident. This suggests that under steady-state conditions, carbon-based fuel still plays a key role in particle formation. Future work will investigate decarbonised fuels to further isolate the effect of oil on emissions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Vehicle emissions and performance · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. Health Effects Institute (2018). State of Global Air 2018, Health Effects Institute. Available online: https://www.stateofglobalair.org/sites/default/files/soga-2018-report.pdf.
2. World Health Organization (2016). Ambient Air Pollution: A Global Assessment of Exposure and Burden of Disease, World Health Organization. (In English).10.17159/2410-972X/2016/v26n2a4 ↗
3. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2022, October 04). Health and Environmental Effects of Particulate Matter (PM), Available online: https://www.epa.gov/pm-pollution/health-and-environmental-effects-particulate-matter-pm.
4. Health Effects Institute (2024). The State of Global Air 2024, Health Effects Institute. (In English).
5. Translocation of inhaled ultrafine particles to the brain10.1080/08958370490439597 ↗
6. Air Pollution and Noncommunicable Diseases: A Review by the Forum of International Respiratory Societies’ Environmental Committee, Part 2: Air Pollution and Organ Systems10.1016/j.chest.2018.10.041 ↗
7. The health effects of ultrafine particles10.1038/s12276-020-0403-3 ↗
8. Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P.M. (2013). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/WG1AR5_SummaryVolume_FINAL.pdf.
9. Aamaas, B., Lund, M.T., Myhre, G., Samset, B.H., Stjern, C.W., and Kallbekken, S. (2018). The climate impacts of current black carbon and organic carbon emissions. CICERO Rep., Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2502504.
10. Climate and Clean Air Coalition (CCAC) (2022, October 04). Climate and Clean Air Coalition (CCAC)—Black Carbon. Available online: https://www.ccacoalition.org/en/slcps/black-carbon.
11. Jacobson, M.Z. (2002). Control of fossil-fuel particulate black carbon and organic matter, possibly the most effective method of slowing global warming. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 107.10.1029/2001JD001376 ↗
12. Wappelhorst, S. (2021). Update on Government Targets for Phasing Out New Sales of Internal Combustion Engine Passenger Cars, International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT). Available online: https://theicct.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/update-govt-targets-ice-phaseouts-jun2021_0.pdf.
13. Krajinska, A. (2021). Euro 7: Europe’s Chance to Have Clean Air, Transport and Environment. Available online: https://www.transportenvironment.org/discover/euro-7-europes-chance-to-have-clean-air/.
14. Heywood, J.B. (2018). Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, McGraw-Hill Education. [2nd ed.]. (In English).
15. Characterisation of soot in oil from a gasoline direct injection engine using Transmission Electron Microscopy10.1016/j.triboint.2015.01.025 ↗
16. Recent Progress in Automotive Gasoline Direct Injection Engine Technology10.1007/s42154-018-0020-1 ↗
17. Flagan, R.C., and Seinfeld, J.H. (2012). Fundamentals of Air Pollution Engineering, Courier Corporation.
18. Elucidating the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons involved in soot inception10.1038/s42004-023-01017-x ↗
19. Formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their growth to soot—A review of chemical reaction pathways10.1016/S0360-1285(00)00009-5 ↗
20. Kittelson, D., and Kraft, M. (2014). Particle Formation and Models, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.10.1002/9781118354179.auto161 ↗
21. Formation of soot from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons as well as fullerenes and carbon nanotubes in the combustion of hydrocarbon10.1007/s10891-011-0459-y ↗
22. On the reactive coagulation of incipient soot nanoparticles10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105866 ↗
23. A Review of Terminology Used to Describe Soot Formation and Evolution under Combustion and Pyrolytic Conditions10.1021/acsnano.0c06226 ↗
24. Recent studies on soot modeling for diesel combustion10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.019 ↗
25. Joint Research Centre Institute for Energy Transport, Mamakos, A., Martini, G., and Dardiotis, C. (2012). Assessment of Particle Number Limits for Petrol Vehicles, Publications Office.
26. Impact of excess NOx emissions from diesel cars on air quality, public health and eutrophication in Europe10.1088/1748-9326/aa8850 ↗
27. Williams, M., and Minjares, R. (2016). A Technical Summary of Euro 6/VI Vehicle Emission Standards, International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT). Available online: https://theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/ICCT_Euro6-VI_briefing_jun2016.pdf.
28. Giechaskiel, B., Woodburn, J., Szczotka, A., and Bielaczyc, P. (2020, January 22–23). Particulate Matter (PM) Emissions of Euro 5 and Euro 6 Vehicles Using Systems with Evaporation Tube or Catalytic Stripper and 23 nm or 10 nm Counters. Proceedings of the SAE Powertrains, Fuels & Lubricants Meeting, Krakow, Poland.10.4271/2020-01-2203 ↗
29. Measurement of Automotive Nonvolatile Particle Number Emissions within the European Legislative Framework: A Review10.1080/02786826.2012.661103 ↗
30. Ethanol Blends and Engine Operating Strategy Effects on Light-Duty Spark-Ignition Engine Particle Emissions10.1021/ef201127y ↗
31. Use of a Catalytic Stripper as an Alternative to the Original PMP Measurement Protocol10.4271/2013-01-1563 ↗
32. Gospodinova, S., and Miccoli, F. (2022, December 21). Commission Proposes New Euro 7 Standards to Reduce Pollutant Emissions from Vehicles and Improve Air Quality. European Commission. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_6495.
33. Measuring Automotive Exhaust Particles Down to 10 nm10.4271/2020-01-2209 ↗
34. Perspectives for regulating 10 nm particle number emissions based on novel measurement methodologies10.1016/j.jaerosci.2022.105957 ↗
35. Leach, F. (2014). Particulate Emissions from Gasoline Direct Injection Engines, Oxford University. Available online: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:ea9c349e-5ade-4878-b758-c9a050c8f069.
36. Pfau, S.A., Haffner-Staton, E., and La Rocca, A. (2022, December 21). Measurement of Sub-23 nm Particulate Emissions from GDI Engines: A Comparison of Processing Methods. SAE Technical Paper 2021-01-0626. Available online: https://saemobilus.sae.org/papers/measurement-sub-23-nm-particulate-emissions-gdi-engines-a-comparison-processing-methods-2021-01-0626.10.4271/2021-01-0626 ↗
37. Investigating the Effect of Volatiles on Sub-23 nm Particle Number Measurements for a Downsized GDI Engine with a Catalytic Stripper and Digital Filtering10.3390/fuels3040041 ↗
38. Particulate emissions from a highly boosted gasoline direct injection engine10.1177/1468087417710583 ↗
39. The effect of oxygenate fuels on PN emissions from a highly boosted GDI engine10.1016/j.fuel.2018.03.148 ↗
40. Leach, F., Richardson, D., Lewis, A., Akehurst, S., and Turner, J. (2019, January 15–19). Sub-23 nm Particulate Emissions from a Highly Boosted GDI Engine. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Engines & Vehicles, Napoli, Italy.10.4271/2019-24-0153 ↗
41. Linking operating conditions of a GDI engine to the nature and nanostructure of ultrafine soot particles10.1016/j.combustflame.2022.112315 ↗
42. Variation in Smoking Tendency Among Hydrocarbons of Low Molecular Weight10.1021/ie50523a038 ↗
43. Predicting the propensity to soot of hydrocarbons and oxygenated molecules by means of structural group contribution factors derived from the processing of unified sooting indexes10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121104 ↗
44. Kittelson, D.B., Watts, W.F., and Johnson, J.P. (2022, December 30). Diesel Aerosol Sampling Methodology—Crc E-43. Available online: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.378.3266&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
45. Particulate emissions of a modern diesel passenger car under laboratory and real-world transient driving conditions10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114948 ↗
46. Effects of Fresh Lubricant Oils on Particle Emissions Emitted by a Modern Gasoline Direct Injection Passenger Car10.1021/es505109u ↗
47. Okuyama, Y., Shimokoji, D., Sakurai, T., and Maruyama, M. (2011, January 12–14). Study of Low-Viscosity Engine Oil on Fuel Economy and Engine Reliability. Proceedings of the SAE 2011 World Congress & Exhibition, Detroit, MI, USA.10.4271/2011-01-1247 ↗
48. Development of Low Viscosity API SN 0W-16 Fuel-Saving Engine Oil Considering Chain Wear Performance10.4271/2017-01-0881 ↗
49. Impact of Engine Lubricant Volatility on Oil and Particle Emissions10.1007/s38313-019-0087-z ↗
50. Influence of ash-soot interactions on the reactivity of soot from a gasoline direct injection engine10.1080/02786826.2020.1788208 ↗
51. Zinola, S., Rouleau, L., Dunand, X., Baltzopoulou, P., Chasapidis, L., Deloglou, D., Melas, A.D., Konstandopoulos, A.G., Rüggeberg, T., and Fierz, M. (2019, January 4–6). Measurement of Sub-23 nm particles emitted by gasoline direct injection engine with new advanced instrumentation. Proceedings of the 2019 JSAE/SAE Powertrains, Fuels and Lubricants, Winchester, UK.10.4271/2019-01-2195 ↗
52. Effect of lubricating oil characteristics on solid particle number and CO2 emissions of a Euro 6 light-duty compressed natural gas fuelled vehicle10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124763 ↗
53. Guido, C., Napolitano, P., Di Domenico, D., Di Maio, D., Beatrice, C., Griffaton, B., and Obrecht, N. (2024). Exploiting Lubricant Formulation to Reduce Particle Emissions from Gas Powered Engines. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17153781 ↗
54. Premnath, V., Khalek, I., Morgan, P., Michlberger, A., Sutton, M., and Vincent, P. (2022, December 30). Effect of Lubricant Oil on Particle Emissions from a Gasoline Direct Injection Light-Duty Vehicle. SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-1708. Available online: https://saemobilus.sae.org/papers/effect-lubricant-oil-particle-emissions-a-gasoline-direct-injection-light-duty-vehicle-2018-01-1708.10.4271/2018-01-1708 ↗
55. (2008). Automotive Fuels—Unleaded Petrol—Requirements and Test Methods (Standard No. EN 228:2008).
56. Gaddam, C.K. (2012). Physical and Chemical Characterization of Gasoline Particulates and Differences Relative to Diesel Soot, Pennsylvania State University. Available online: https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/files/final_submissions/7062.
57. (2024). Standard Practice for Calculating Viscosity Index from Kinematic Viscosity at 40 °C and 100 °C (Standard No. ASTM D2270-24).
58. (2020). Standard Test Method for Measuring Viscosity of New and Used Engine Oils at High Shear Rate and High Temperature by Tapered Bearing Simulator Viscometer at 150 °C (Standard No. ASTM D4683-20).
59. (2020). Standard Test Method for Apparent Viscosity of Engine Oils and Base Stocks Between −10 °C and −35 °C Using Cold-Cranking Simulator (Standard No. ASTM D5293-20).
60. (2021). Standard Test Method for Evaporation Loss of Lubricating Oils by the Noack Method (Standard No. ASTM D5800-21).
61. Treatment of losses of ultrafine aerosol particles in long sampling tubes during ambient measurements10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.003 ↗
62. Role of Lubrication Oil in Particulate Emissions from a Hydrogen-Powered Internal Combustion Engine10.1021/es070999r ↗
63. On aerosol formation by condensation of oil vapor in the crankcase of combustion engines10.1080/02786826.2021.1976720 ↗