Developing Productivity–Safety Effectiveness Index Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)
Source abstract
Abstract
The social value of corporate responsibilities has become increasingly important in recent years. Among these, safety performance stands out as a critical social mission for achieving business success in today’s economy. Enhancing safety capabilities can be regarded as a sustainable value embedded in production planning. However, despite the need to balance productivity and safety performance in the industrial sector, an integrated approach to measuring these dual aspects remains lacking. Therefore, this study aims to examine the relationship between productivity and safety performance while considering the characteristics of industrial production. To achieve this, the Productivity–Safety Effectiveness Index (PSEI), an integrated economic measure, is proposed based on safety performance inputs and productivity outputs. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is employed to calculate and evaluate both productivity and safety effectiveness. The findings include patterns of input and output, industry benchmarking, and trend analyses.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Occupational Health and Safety Research · Quality and Supply Management · Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Dongguk University, 30, Pildong-ro 1-gil, Jung-gu, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT: Ministry of Science and ICT)
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. ICT, innovation, and firm productivity: New evidence from small local firms10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.030 ↗
2. Digital economy: An innovation driver for total factor productivity10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.061 ↗
3. Data analytics, innovation, and firm productivity10.1287/mnsc.2018.3281 ↗
4. The effectiveness of the ISO 9001 quality management system and its influential critical factors in Greek manufacturing companies10.1080/00207543.2014.965353 ↗
5. Where in the supply chain network does ISO 9001 improve firm productivity?10.1016/j.ejor.2019.11.042 ↗
6. ISO 9001 and performance: A method review10.1080/14783363.2018.1524293 ↗
7. Exploring the interactive effects of safety investments, safety culture and project hazard on safety performance: An empirical analysis10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.10.016 ↗
8. Investigating the effectiveness of safety costs on productivity and quality enhancement by means of a quantitative approach10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.017 ↗
9. Identifying convergence fields and technologies for industrial safety: LDA-based network analysis10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.013 ↗
10. Undocumented status as a social determinant of occupational safety and health: The workers’ perspective10.1002/ajim.22531 ↗
11. Occupational health and safety management in organizations: A review10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00319.x ↗
12. Safety regulation enforcement and production safety: The role of penalties and voluntary safety management systems10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108481 ↗
13. Effect of safety investments on safety performance of building projects10.1016/j.ssci.2013.04.004 ↗
14. Modelling the effects of employee injury risks on injury, productivity and production quality using system dynamics10.1080/00207543.2019.1667040 ↗
15. An assessment of the OHSAS 18001 certification process: Objective drivers and consequences on safety performance and labor productivity10.1016/j.ssci.2013.06.011 ↗
16. Identification of systems thinking aspects in ISO 45001: 2018 on occupational health safety management10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105671 ↗
17. Safety culture, safety performance, and financial performance. A longitudinal study10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106409 ↗
18. More sustainable, more productive: Evidence from ESG ratings and total factor productivity among listed Chinese firms10.1016/j.frl.2022.103439 ↗
19. Occupational health and safety issues in operations management: A systematic and citation network analysis review10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.07.025 ↗
20. Design for occupational safety and health: A theoretical framework for organizational capability10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105005 ↗
21. Investigating the impact of establishing integrated management systems on accidents and safety performance indices: A case study10.1016/j.shaw.2018.04.001 ↗
22. Developing concentration index of industrial and occupational accidents: The case of European countries10.1016/j.shaw.2020.05.003 ↗
23. Trajectories of efficiency measurement: A bibliometric analysis of DEA and SFA10.1016/j.ejor.2014.04.041 ↗
24. A survey of DEA applications10.1016/j.omega.2012.11.004 ↗
25. Risk-based management of occupational safety and health in the construction industry–Part 2: Quantitative model10.1016/j.ssci.2015.01.003 ↗
26. (1996). Regulations (Standards-29 CFR) (Standard No. OSHA 1996). Available online: https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1996.
27. Eco-efficiency based on social performance and its relationship with financial performance: A cross-industry analysis of South Korea10.1111/jiec.12167 ↗
28. Measuring and comparing the R&D performance of government research institutes: A bottom-up data envelopment analysis approach10.1016/j.joi.2015.10.001 ↗
29. National innovation efficiency: A DEA-based measurement of OECD countries10.1108/IJIS-07-2021-0118 ↗
30. Three-stage super-efficiency DEA models based on the cooperative game and its application on the R&D green innovation of the Chinese high-tech industry10.1016/j.cie.2021.107234 ↗
31. He, P., Sun, Y., Shen, H., Jian, J., and Yu, Z. (2019). Does Environmental Tax Affect Energy Efficiency? An Empirical Study of Energy Efficiency in OECD Countries Based on DEA and Logit Model. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11143792 ↗
32. Efficiency-based rank assessment for electric power industry: A combined use of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and DEA-Discriminant Analysis (DA)10.1016/j.eneco.2011.04.001 ↗
33. A DEA approach for evaluating the relationship between energy efficiency and financial performance for energy-intensive firms in Korea10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120283 ↗
34. A two-stage eco-efficiency evaluation of China’s industrial sectors: A dynamic network data envelopment analysis (DNDEA) approach10.1016/j.psep.2021.02.005 ↗
35. Song, M., Jia, G., and Zhang, P. (2020). An evaluation of air transport sector operational efficiency in China based on a three-stage DEA analysis. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12104220 ↗
36. Yu, M., Xu, S., Zhou, F., and Xu, H. (2024). A study on the relationship between urban spatial structure evolution and ecological efficiency in Shandong Province. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14020818 ↗
37. Environmental policies and energy efficiency investments. An industry-level analysis10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112461 ↗
38. Tong, H., Hou, Q., Dong, X., Duan, Y., Gao, W., and Lei, K. (2025). Assessing the spatial efficiency of Xi’an rail transit station areas using a data envelopment analysis (DEA) model. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15010384 ↗