journal article·2025-01-31Open access

Case-Based Axiomatic Design Assistant (CADA): Combining Axiomatic Design and Case-Based Reasoning to Create a Design Knowledge Graph for Pharmaceutical Engineering

Roland Wölfle, Irina Saur-Amaral, Leonor Teixeira

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 3

Abstract

The development of personalized drugs introduces new uncertainties and risks in production machinery design, which can be mitigated through structured workflows. As the commonly used V-Model approach has limitations in dealing with complex multi-domain problems, it is essential to address traceability and relationships between requirements and solutions in a regulated environment to ensure product quality. This study focuses on the conceptual design phase and develops a design methodology called the Case-based Axiomatic Design Assistant (CADA) to address this type of problem. It takes, as a starting point, Axiomatic Design (AD), due to its simplicity and graphical tools for quality evaluation, and Case-Based Reasoning (CBR), due to its capacity to integrate data structures and continuously improve. This combination is put into practice through a visual assistant that utilizes a knowledge graph to represent design elements comprehensively. This article describes the development, implementation, and testing process of CADA, which includes examples of the conceptual design for pharmaceutical manufacturing. The proposed CADA method facilitates systematic requirements analysis, structured reasoning, and solution evaluation, and overcomes the limitations of previous methodologies. It represents a novel approach with an intuitive workflow and advanced graphical capabilities, exemplified in the context of a conceptual design for pharmaceutical manufacturing. The inclusion of intrinsic data labeling capabilities and inference visualization enhances its relevance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Manufacturing Process and Optimization · AI-based Problem Solving and Planning · Software Engineering Techniques and Practices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Doctoral School, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal

Pester Pac Automation GmbH, 87787 Wolfertschwenden, Germany

Superior Institute of Accounting and Business, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal

NECE-UBI, Universidade da Beira Interior, 6200-209 Covilhã, Portugal

Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism (DEGEIT), University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal

Intelligent Systems Associate Laboratory (LASI), Institute of Electronics and Informatics Engineering of Aveiro (IEETA), University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal

Funding

Research Center for Business Sciences · Institute of Electronics and In-formatics Engineering of Aveiro (IEETA)

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. Use of models in conceptual design10.1080/09544820600664994 ↗
2. Supporting conceptual design based on the function-behavior-state modeler10.1017/S0890060400001621 ↗
3. Automating design with intelligent human-machine integration10.1016/j.cirp.2015.05.008 ↗
4. A transition approach to portable ontology specifications10.1006/knac.1993.1008 ↗
5. Knowledge Engineering: Principles and methods10.1016/S0169-023X(97)00056-6 ↗
6. Genesereth, M.R., and Nilsson, N.J. (1987). Logical Foundations of Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann.
7. Gerhard Pahl, W.B., Feldhusen, J., and Grote, K.-J. (2006). Engineering Design—A Systematic Approach, Springer.10.1007/978-1-84628-319-2 ↗
8. Reusing design knowledge based on design cases and knowledge map10.1007/s10798-013-9239-7 ↗
9. Recent development of knowledge-based systems, methods and tools for One-of-a-Kind Production10.1016/j.knosys.2011.05.005 ↗
10. Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process10.1016/j.compind.2007.05.013 ↗
11. Rauch, E., Dallasega, P., and Matt, D.T. (2015, January 16–18). Axiomatic Design based Guidelines for the Design of a Lean Product Development Process. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Axiomatic Design (ICAD 2015), Florence, Italy.
12. ISPE (2008). GAMP® 5: A Risk-Based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerized Systems, International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering.
13. GAMP 5/Introduction—Overview
14. Sarhadi, P., Naeem, W., Fraser, K., and Wilson, D. (2022, January 24–27). On the Application of Agile Project Management Techniques, V-Model and Recent Software Tools in Postgraduate Theses Supervision. Proceedings of the 13th IFAC Symposium on Advances in Control Education (ACE), Hamburg, Germany.
15. Knowledge engineering issues in developing a case-based reasoning application10.1016/S0950-7051(99)00042-8 ↗
16. Adaptation of the quality by design concept in early pharmaceutical development of an intranasal nanosized formulation10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.06.018 ↗
17. Pharmaceutical quality by design: Product and process development, understanding, and control10.1007/s11095-008-9667-3 ↗
18. EMA (2024, March 14). ICH Guideline Q8 (R2) on Pharmaceutical Development. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/international-conference-harmonisation-technical-requirements-registration-pharmaceuticals-human-use_en-11.pdf.
19. FDA (2024, March 14). Guidance for Industry PAT—A Framework for Innovative Pharmaceutical Development, Manufacturing, and Quality Assurance, Available online: https://www.fda.gov/media/71012/download.
20. Barenji, R.V., Akdag, Y., Yet, B., and Oner, L. (2019). Cyber-physical-based PAT (CPbPAT) framework for Pharma 4.0. Int. J. Pharm., 567.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.06.036 ↗
21. Liu, Q., Chen, J., Wang, W., and Qin, Q. (2021). Conceptual Design Evaluation Considering Confidence Based on Z-AHP-TOPSIS Method. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11167400 ↗
22. Identifying and ranking risks using combined FMEA-TOPSIS method for new product development in the dairy industry and offering mitigation strategies: Case study of Ramak Company10.1007/s13198-022-01672-8 ↗
23. Selecting alternatives in the conceptual design phase: An application of Fuzzy-AHP and Pugh’s Controlled Convergence10.1007/s12008-013-0187-y ↗
24. Applications of TRIZ and Axiomatic Design: A Comparison to Deduce Best Practices in Industry10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.171 ↗
25. Understanding TRIZ through the review of top cited publications10.1016/j.compind.2016.06.002 ↗
26. Application of the TRIZ Contradictory Matrix to Foster Innovation for Sustainable Chemical Engineering10.1002/cite.202100205 ↗
27. Fiorineschi, L., Frillici, F.S., and Rotini, F. (2018, January 21–24). Supporting Systematic Conceptual Design with TRIZ. Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia.10.21278/idc.2018.0135 ↗
28. Axiomatic design as support for decision-making in a design for manufacturing context:: A case study10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.002 ↗
29. Axiomatic based decomposition for conceptual product design10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00025.x ↗
30. Axiomatic design of mechanical systems10.1115/1.2836467 ↗
31. A semantic model for axiomatic systems design10.1177/0954406217718858 ↗
32. Manufacturing System Design10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63245-4 ↗
33. Arinez, J., and Cochran, D. (1999, January 24–26). Application of a production system design framework to equipment design. Proceedings of the 32nd CIRP International Seminar on Manufacturing Systems, Leuven, Belgium.
34. Evaluating manufacturing system design and performance using the manufacturing system design decomposition approach10.1016/S0278-6125(01)80059-5 ↗
35. A Methodology for an Integrated Design and Process Planning Based on a Concurrent Engineering Reference Model10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62351-8 ↗
36. Simultaneous engineering approach to an integrated design and process planning10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00293-7 ↗
37. Integrative development of product and production system for mechatronic products10.1016/j.rcim.2011.02.005 ↗
38. Use of the ‘double diamond’ design framework to nurture creativity in life sciences research10.1016/j.tibs.2024.04.008 ↗
39. Design Council (2024, September 01). The Double Diamond—Design Council. Available online: https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-resources/the-double-diamond/.
40. Wilkerson, B., and Trellevik, L.-K.L. (2021). Sustainability-oriented innovation: Improving problem definition through combined design thinking and systems mapping approaches. Think. Ski. Creat., 42.10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100932 ↗
41. Data-driven modelling of the functional level in model-based systems engineering—Optimization of module scopes in modular development10.1016/j.procir.2023.03.147 ↗
42. Tissen, D., Wiederkehr, I., Koldewey, C., and Dumitrescu, R. (2023, January 22–24). Exploring data-driven model-based systems engineering: A systematic literature review. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD), Rabat, Morocco.10.1109/ICTMOD59086.2023.10438129 ↗
43. Dong, J.W., Jing, X.W., Lu, X., Liu, J.F., Li, H.P., Cao, X.W., Du, C.X., Li, J., and Li, L. (2022). Process knowledge graph modeling techniques and application methods for ship heterogeneous models. Sci. Rep., 12.10.1038/s41598-022-06940-y ↗
44. Knowledge Graph Semantic Enhancement of Input Data for Improving AI10.1109/MIC.2020.2979620 ↗
45. Bidgoli, H. (2003). Expert Systems. Encyclopedia of Information Systems, Elsevier.10.1016/B0-12-227240-4/00126-X ↗
46. Human-machine collaboration in online customer service—A long-term feedback-based approach10.1007/s12525-020-00420-9 ↗
47. Yan, A.J., and Cheng, Z.J. (2024). A Review of the Development and Future Challenges of Case-Based Reasoning. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14167130 ↗
48. Sarica, S., Han, J., and Luo, J. (2023). Design representation as semantic networks. Comput. Ind., 144.10.1016/j.compind.2022.103791 ↗
49. A risk management ontology for Quality-by-Design based on a new development approach according GAMP 5.010.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.089 ↗
50. Conceptual design using axiomatic design in a TRIZ framework10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.163 ↗
51. Ontology-based design information extraction and retrieval10.1017/S0890060407070199 ↗
52. Khanolkar, P.M., Vrolijk, A., and Olechowski, A. (2023). Mapping artificial intelligence-based methods to engineering design stages: A focused literature review. Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf., 37.10.1017/S0890060423000203 ↗
53. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012 ↗
54. What Did My AI Learn? How Data Scientists Make Sense of Model Behavior10.1145/3542921 ↗
55. Han, J., Childs, P.R.N., and Luo, J. (2024). Applications of artificial intelligence and cognitive science in design. Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf., 38.10.1017/S0890060424000052 ↗
56. Applicability of classifier to discovery knowledge for future prediction modelling10.1007/s12652-022-03694-3 ↗
57. Smelser, N.J., and Baltes, P.B. (2001). Knowledge Representation. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Pergamon.
58. Case-based reasoning—Foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches10.3233/AIC-1994-7104 ↗
59. Case-based reasoning: An overview
60. Digital-supported problem solving for shopfloor steering using case-based reasoning and Bayesian networks10.1016/j.procir.2023.03.086 ↗
61. Teaching axiomatic design to engineers—Theory, applications, and software10.1016/S0278-6125(06)80007-5 ↗
62. An object-centered approach for modelling engineering design products: Combining description logic and object-oriented modelling10.1017/S0890060400003115 ↗
63. Zhang, L.L., Tan, R.H., Peng, Q.J., Shao, P., Dong, Y.F., and Wang, K. (2022). Construction and Application of Enterprise Knowledge Base for Product Innovation Design. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12136358 ↗
64. Yue, G.F., Liu, J.H., Zhang, Q., and Hou, Y.Z. (2023). Building a Design-Rationale-Centric Knowledge Network to Realize the Internalization of Explicit Knowledge. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13031539 ↗
65. Caro-Martínez, M., Recio-García, J.A., Díaz-Agudo, B., Darias, J.M., Wiratunga, N., Martin, K., Wijekoon, A., Nkisi-Orji, I., Corsar, D., and Pradeep, P. (2024). iSee: A case-based reasoning platform for the design of explanation experiences. Knowl.-Based Syst., 302.10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112305 ↗
66. Schultheis, A., Zeyen, C., and Bergmann, R. (2023, January 17–20). An Overview and Comparison of Case-Based Reasoning Frameworks. Proceedings of the Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development, ICCBR 2023, Aberdeen, UK.10.1007/978-3-031-40177-0_21 ↗
67. Xie, X.W., Chen, L., Fang, H.Z., and Chen, Y.X. (2009, January 8–11). Research on Process Supervision and Quality Control System of Modular Pharmaceutical Production Line. Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology, Beijing, China.