journal article·2025-01-26Open access

Development of a Clinical Decision Support System Using Artificial Intelligence Methods for Liver Transplant Centers

Mete Yağanoğlu, Gürkan Öztürk, Ferhat Bozkurt, Zeynep Bilen, Zühal Yetiş Demir, Sinan Kul, Emrah Şimşek, Salih Kara, Hakan Eygu, Necip Altundaş, Nurhak Aksungur, Ercan Korkut, Mehmet Sinan Başar, Nurinnisa Öztürk

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 3

Abstract

The objective of this study is to utilize artificial intelligence techniques for the diagnosis of complications and diseases that may arise after liver transplantation, as well as for the identification of patients in need of transplantation. To achieve this, an interface was developed to collect patient information from Atatürk University Research Hospital, specifically focusing on individuals who have undergone liver transplantation. The collected data were subsequently entered into a comprehensive database. Additionally, relevant patient information was obtained through the hospital’s information processing system, which was used to create a data pool. The classification of data was based on four dependent variables, namely, the presence or absence of death (“exitus”), recurrence location, tumor recurrence, and cause of death. Techniques such as Principal Component Analysis and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) were employed to enhance the performance of the models. Among the various methods employed, the LDA method consistently yielded superior results in terms of accuracy during k-fold cross-validation. Following k-fold cross-validation, the model achieved the highest accuracy of 98% for the dependent variable “exitus”. For the dependent variable “recurrence location”, the highest accuracy obtained after k-fold cross-validation was 91%. Furthermore, the highest accuracy of 99% was achieved for both the dependent variables “tumor recurrence” and “cause of death” after k-fold cross-validation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ataturk University, Erzurum 25240, Turkey

Ataturk University Organ Transplant Center, Ataturk University, Erzurum 25240, Turkey

Department of Computer Technologies, Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Bayburt University, Bayburt 69000, Turkey

Faculty of Open and Distance Education, Ataturk University, Erzurum 25240, Turkey

Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Erzurum Technical University, Erzurum 25050, Turkey

Department of Statistics, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Ataturk University, Erzurum 25240, Turkey

Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum 25240, Turkey

Funding

Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Machine learning in liver disease diagnosis: Current progress and future opportunities10.1088/1757-899X/1022/1/012029 ↗
2. AISF position paper on liver disease and pregnancy10.1016/j.dld.2015.11.004 ↗
3. Osteosarcopenia in autoimmune cholestatic liver diseases: Causes, management, and challenges10.3748/wjg.v28.i14.1430 ↗
4. Spontaneous bone regeneration of the mandible in an elderly patient: A case report and review of the literature10.1142/S0192415X03001065 ↗
5. Decision factors on effective liver patient data prediction10.14257/ijbsbt.2014.6.4.16 ↗
6. Ayeldeen, H., Shaker, O., Ayeldeen, G., and Anwar, K.M. (2015, January 23–25). Prediction of liver fibrosis stages by machine learning model: A decision tree approach. Proceedings of the 2015 Third World Conference on Complex Systems (WCCS), Marrakech, Morocco.10.1109/ICoCS.2015.7483212 ↗
7. Performance analysis of classification algorithms on early detection of liver disease10.1016/j.eswa.2016.08.065 ↗
8. Artificial intelligence for predicting survival following deceased donor liver transplantation: Retrospective multi-center study10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106838 ↗
9. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for donor–recipient decision system in liver transplants10.1016/j.ejor.2012.05.013 ↗
10. Hashem, S., ElHefnawi, M., Habashy, S., El-Adawy, M., Esmat, G., Elakel, W., Abdelazziz, A.O., Nabeel, M.M., Abdelmaksoud, A.H., and Elbaz, T.M. (2020). Machine learning prediction models for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma with HCV-related chronic liver disease. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 196.10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105551 ↗
11. Use of artificial intelligence as an innovative donor-recipient matching model for liver transplantation: Results from a multicenter Spanish study10.1016/j.jhep.2014.05.039 ↗
12. Chen, C., Chen, B., Yang, J., Li, X., Peng, X., Feng, Y., Guo, R., Zou, F., Zhou, S., and Hei, Z. (2023). Development and validation of a machine learning model for prediction of liver transplantation outcomes. Front. Med., 10.10.1080/07853890.2023.2179104 ↗
13. Recurrent neural network based methods for hepatitis diagnosis
14. An efficient lightweight convolutional neural network for industrial surface defect detection10.1007/s10462-023-10438-y ↗
15. A novel deep convolutional neural network algorithm for surface defect detection
16. Artificial intelligence and liver transplantation; literature review10.22543/2392-7674.1532 ↗
17. Prasad, R., and Kasiemobi, O.M. (2024, January 9–10). Prediction of mortality in liver transplant recipients using neural network. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE International Conference on Computing, Power and Communication Technologies (IC2PCT), Greater Noida, India.10.1109/IC2PCT60090.2024.10486395 ↗
18. Hidayat, E., Fajrian, N.A., Muda, A.K., Huoy, C.Y., and Ahmad, S. (2011, January 5–8). A comparative study of feature extraction using PCA and LDA for face recognition. Proceedings of the 2011 7th International Conference on Information Assurance and Security (IAS), Melacca, Malaysia.10.1109/ISIAS.2011.6122779 ↗
19. Aburomman, A.A., and Reaz, M.B.I. (2016, January 3–5). Ensemble of binary SVM classifiers based on PCA and LDA feature extraction for intrusion detection. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IMCEC), Xi’an, China.10.1109/IMCEC.2016.7867287 ↗
20. Model Analytic in Fintech User Comment Features Using LDA-CNN on Imbalanced Data
21. The role of machine learning algorithms for diagnosing diseases
22. Supervised machine learning algorithms: Classification and comparison10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V48P126 ↗
23. A machine learning framework for predicting long-term graft survival after kidney transplantation10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115235 ↗
24. A machine learning framework to predict kidney graft failure with class imbalance using Red Deer algorithm10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118515 ↗
25. Predicting the kidney graft survival using optimized African buffalo-based artificial neural network10.1155/2022/6503714 ↗
26. Yoo, K.D., Noh, J., Lee, H., Kim, D.K., Lim, C.S., Kim, Y.H., Lee, J.P., Kim, G., and Kim, Y.S. (2017). A machine learning approach using survival statistics to predict graft survival in kidney transplant recipients: A multicenter cohort study. Sci. Rep., 7.10.1038/s41598-017-08008-8 ↗
27. Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: A methodology review10.1016/S1532-0464(03)00034-0 ↗
28. Advancing horizons in remote sensing: A comprehensive survey of deep learning models and applications in image classification and beyond10.1007/s00521-024-10165-7 ↗
29. Machine learning support for decision-making in kidney transplantation: Step-by-step development of a technological solution10.2196/34554 ↗
30. Using ANN in selection of the most important variables in prediction of chronic renal allograft rejection progression10.1016/S0041-1345(98)01665-0 ↗
31. Predicting kidney transplantation outcome based on hybrid feature selection and KNN classifier10.1007/s11042-019-7370-5 ↗
32. Mark, E., Goldsman, D., Gurbaxani, B., Keskinocak, P., and Sokol, J. (2019). Using machine learning and an ensemble of methods to predict kidney transplant survival. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0209068 ↗
33. Prediction of the survival of kidney transplantation with imbalanced data using intelligent algorithms
34. Machine learning models in predicting graft survival in kidney transplantation: Meta-analysis10.1093/bjsopen/zrad011 ↗
35. Shi, P., and Fu, C. (2024). Time-dependent LSTM for Survival Prediction and Patient Subtyping in Kidney Disease Trajectory. medRxiv.10.1101/2024.09.25.24314409 ↗
36. Decruyenaere, A., Decruyenaere, P., Peeters, P., Vermassen, F., Dhaene, T., and Couckuyt, I. (2015). Prediction of delayed graft function after kidney transplantation: Comparison between logistic regression and machine learning methods. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., 15.10.1186/s12911-015-0206-y ↗
37. Machine learning for the prediction of severe pneumonia during posttransplant hospitalization in recipients of a deceased-donor kidney transplant10.21037/atm.2020.01.09 ↗
38. Decisional trees in renal transplant follow-up10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.03.061 ↗
39. Tolstyak, Y., Zhuk, R., Yakovlev, I., Shakhovska, N., Gregus ml, M., Chopyak, V., and Melnykova, N. (2021). The ensembles of machine learning methods for survival predicting after kidney transplantation. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112110380 ↗
40. Esteban, C., Staeck, O., Baier, S., Yang, Y., and Tresp, V. (2016, January 4–7). Predicting clinical events by combining static and dynamic information using recurrent neural networks. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI), Chicago, IL, USA.10.1109/ICHI.2016.16 ↗
41. Bayesian modeling of pretransplant variables accurately predicts kidney graft survival10.1159/000345552 ↗
42. Prediction of chronic allograft nephropathy using classification trees10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.03.062 ↗
43. Öztemel, E. (2003). Artificial Neural Networks, PapatyaYayincilik.
44. Generalized Minkowski metrics for mixed feature-type data analysis10.1109/21.286391 ↗
45. Graf, R., Zeldovich, M., and Friedrich, S. (2024). Comparing linear discriminant analysis and supervised learning algorithms for binary classification—A method comparison study. Biom. J., 66.10.1002/bimj.202200098 ↗
46. Machine learning from theory to algorithms: An overview10.1088/1742-6596/1142/1/012012 ↗
47. Diabetes detection using deep learning algorithms10.1016/j.icte.2018.10.005 ↗
48. Design of IoT energy consumption forecasting model for residential buildings based on improved long short-term memory (LSTM)10.1016/j.meaene.2024.100033 ↗
49. Ertorsun, A.D., Bağ, B., Uzar, G., and Turanoğlu, M.A. (2025, January 20). Evaluation of the Performance of Diagnostic Tests with ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) Curve Method. Available online: https://tip.baskent.edu.tr/kw/upload/464/dosyalar/cg/sempozyum/ogrsmpzsnm12/10.2.pdf.