journal article·2025-01-22Open access

Sugar Maple and Red Maple Face-Off: Which Produces More and Sweeter Sap?

Aya Garfa, Roberto Silvestro, Sara Yumi Sassamoto Kurokawa, Sergio Rossi, Annie Deslauriers, Serge Lavoie

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 3

Abstract

Among the species used for syrup production, sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) is preferred by producers, while red maple (Acer rubrum L.) is considered less productive in terms of sap yield and sugar content. This study aims to measure the volume and physicochemical characteristics of the sap produced from two red maples and two sugar maples during the 2023 sugar season in a commercial sugarbush in Laterrière (QC, Canada). Sap exudation was measured continuously with the gravity method using automatic rain gauges. Sap production was discontinuous and heterogeneous, reaching 2.6 L during the most productive day. No significant difference was found in the daily production between species, but we observed a difference in the cumulative sap production (7 L in red maple vs. 13.5 L in sugar maple) due to a longer period of sap exudation in the latter. Despite daily variations in pH, Brix values, sucrose concentration, osmolality, and conductivity, no differences in physicochemical characteristics were detected between species.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fermentation and Sensory Analysis · Horticultural and Viticultural Research · Natural Products and Biological Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Département des Sciences Fondamentales, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, 555 Boulevard de L’Université, Chicoutimi, QC G7H 2B1, Canada

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada · Observatoire régional de recherche en forêt boréale · Créneau d’excellence acéricole · Club acéricole du Sud du Québec · Syndicat des producteurs des bois du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean · Producteurs et productrices acéricoles du Québec · Centre ACER

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Sweet trees, sour circumstances: The long search for sustainability in the North American maple products industry10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.006 ↗
2. Modelling the effect of climate on maple syrup production in Québec, Canada10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.035 ↗
3. (2024, August 01). Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Statistical Overview of the Canadian Maple Industry. Available online: https://agriculture.canada.ca/sites/default/files/documents/2024-06/maple_report_2023-eng.pdf.
4. Legault, S., Houle, D., Plouffe, A., Ameztegui, A., Kuehn, D., Chase, L., Blondlot, A., and Perkins, T.D. (2019). Perceptions of U.S. and Canadian maple syrup producers toward climate change, its impacts, and potential adaptation measures. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0215511 ↗
5. Effect of temperature on physical properties of canadian maple (Acer saccharum Marsh) syrup
6. TAMM review: On the importance of tap and tree characteristics in maple sugaring10.1016/j.foreco.2023.120896 ↗
7. Amazing grace: The cutleaf maples10.5962/p.251177 ↗
8. Hot-water extraction optimization of sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) and red maple (Acer rubrum L.) bark applying principal component analysis10.1080/02773813.2017.1279631 ↗
9. A comparative physicochemical analysis of maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) syrup produced in North America with special emphasis on seasonal changes in Nova Scotia maple syrup composition10.1016/j.jfca.2020.103573 ↗
10. Ramadan, M.F., Gad, H.A., and Farag, M.A. (2021). Chemistry, processing, and functionality of maple food products: An updated comprehensive review. J. Food Biochem., 45.10.1111/jfbc.13832 ↗
11. The North American Maple Syrup Council (2022). North American Maple Syrup Producers Manual, The University of Vermont. [3rd ed.].
12. Hendlin, Y.H., and Hope, J. (2021). Food, care and the sugar maple stand. Food and Medicine: A Biosemiotic Perspective, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-67115-0 ↗
13. N’guyen, G.Q., Roblet, C., Lagacé, L., and Filteau, M. (2022). A metataxonomic analysis of maple sap microbial communities reveals new insights into maple syrup complexity. Front. Syst. Biol., 2.10.3389/fsysb.2022.893007 ↗
14. Maple syrup-production, composition, chemistry, and sensory characteristics10.1016/S1043-4526(08)00604-9 ↗
15. Forest succession models: A rationale and methodology for modeling forest succession over large regions
16. Sugar maple growth in relation to nutrition and stress in the northeastern United States10.1890/08-1535.1 ↗
17. Differences in the success of sugar maple and red maple seedlings on acid soils are influenced by nutrient dynamics and light environment10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01337.x ↗
18. Evidence for increasing red maple abundance in the eastern United States
19. Stand history is more important than climate in controlling red maple (Acer rubrum L.) growth at its northern distribution limit in western Quebec, Canada10.1093/jpe/rtu029 ↗
20. Differential success of oak and red maple regeneration in oak and pine stands on intermediate-quality sites in northern Lower Michigan10.1016/j.foreco.2005.05.041 ↗
21. Soil-site relationships and soil characteristics associated with even-aged red maple (Acer rubrum) stands in Wisconsin and Michigan10.1016/0378-1127(87)90073-9 ↗
22. Comparative analysis of four maple species for syrup production in south-central Appalachia
23. Conifers and important hardwoods
24. Measuring natural sap production in sugar maple at daily temporal resolution
25. A statistical evaluation of some of the factors responsible for the flow of sap from the sugar maple10.1104/pp.31.1.57 ↗
26. Daily timings of sap production in sugar maple in Quebec, Canada10.1007/s00484-022-02399-8 ↗
27. Interannual and spatial variability of maple syrup yield as related to climatic factors10.7717/peerj.428 ↗
28. N’guyen, G.Q., Martin, N., Jain, M., Lagacé, L., Landry, C.R., and Filteau, M. (2018). A systems biology approach to explore the impact of maple tree dormancy release on sap variation and maple syrup quality. Sci. Rep., 8.10.1038/s41598-018-32940-y ↗
29. Effects of soil freezing stress on sap flow and sugar content of mature sugar maples (Acer saccharum)10.1139/x95-065 ↗
30. Budbreak for twenty-three upland hardwoods compared under forest canopies and in recent clearcuts
31. Biochemical composition of maple sap and relationships among constituents10.1016/j.jfca.2014.12.030 ↗
32. Response of northern hardwoods to experimental soil acidification and alkalinisation after 20 years10.1016/j.foreco.2017.06.051 ↗
33. Finding the sweet spot: Shifting optimal climate for maple syrup production in North America10.1016/j.foreco.2019.05.045 ↗
34. Seasonal and regional diversity of maple sap microbiota revealed using community PCR fingerprinting and 16S rRNA gene clone libraries10.1016/j.syapm.2010.02.003 ↗
35. Jose Garcia, E., McDowell, T., Ketola, C., Jennings, M., David Miller, J., and Renaud, J.B. (2020). Metabolomics reveals chemical changes in Acer saccharum sap over a maple syrup production season. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0235787 ↗
36. Sugar sensing and signaling in plants: Conserved and novel mechanisms10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105441 ↗
37. Rapid prediction of maple syrup grade and sensory quality by estimation of microbial quality of maple sap using ATP bioluminescence10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb08734.x ↗
38. Maple sirup. XI. Relationship between the type and origin of reducing sugars in sap and the color and flavor of maple sirup10.1111/j.1365-2621.1957.tb17517.x ↗
39. Informing producers in a nontraditional maple syrup region: Red maple and sugar maple production parameters in Kentucky
40. Intra-annual dynamics of non-structural carbohydrates in the cambium of mature conifer trees reflects radial growth demands10.1093/treephys/tpt075 ↗
41. A mathematical model linking tree sap flow dynamics to daily stem diameter fluctuations and radial stem growth10.1093/treephys/26.3.257 ↗
42. Pasteurized and sterilized maple sap as functional beverages: Chemical composition and antioxidant activities10.1016/j.jff.2013.06.009 ↗