Evaluation of Impact Energy Absorption by Natural Fiber Composites in Motorcycle Helmets
Source abstract
Abstract
In response to the growing concerns regarding motorcyclists’ safety and advancements in the motorcycle industry, this study investigated the potential of natural fibers as a sustainable approach for enhancing helmet protection, thus replacing the traditional use of expanded polystyrene. Utilizing statistical tools such as the Shapiro–Wilk test, Chauvenet’s criterion, and the interquartile range, we compared the impact energy absorption of composites reinforced with natural fibers, including sugarcane bagasse, coconut, and sisal, added to expanded polyurethane prototypes. The results, evaluated through confidence intervals, indicated that composites reinforced with 5% sugarcane bagasse, 5% and 10% coconut, and 10% and 15% sisal exhibited significantly superior impact absorption performance compared to pure expanded polyurethane. Composites with agave sisalana fibers exhibited low variability and reliable performance, with the 10% concentration showing the best results. Sugarcane bagasse fiber demonstrated strong stability, especially at a 5% concentration. Coconut fiber performed well at both 5% and 10% concentrations but showed the greatest variability among the fibers tested. These findings underscore the potential of natural fibers in enhancing helmet safety and suggest promising directions for future research into the ideal composite materials for motorcycle helmets, an inquiry that is currently underway.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Institute of Technology, Rio de Janeiro 20081-312, Brazil
Postgraduate Programme in Metrology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 22451-900, Brazil
Brazilian Institute of Metrology, Quality and Technology (INMETRO), Duque de Caxias 25250-020, Brazil
Land Transportation and Storage, Measurement and Product Inventory Management, Logistics, Petrobras S.A., Rio de Janeiro 20231-030, Brazil
Funding
Brazilian agency CNPq · Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. (2021). A Motocicleta no Brasil do Século XXI. ABRAMET.
2. OPAS, Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde (2023, June 14). Segurança no Trânsito. [Online]. Available online: https://www.paho.org/pt/topicos/seguranca-no-transito.
3. Linhares, L. (2022). Análise da Performance de Capacetes para Motociclistas: Influência da Temperatura em Ensaios de Impacto, Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Engenharia Mecânica)—Departamento de Ensino Superior do CEFET/RJ.
4. Ferreira, R. (2013). Estudo Comparativo do Desempenho Mecânico de Capacetes Fabricados com Diferentes Materiais Atuando na Segurança do Motociclista, Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Engenharia de Materiais)—Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Minas Gerais.
5. Biocomposites Reinforced with Natural Fibers: 2000–201010.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003 ↗
6. Analysis of Light Weight Natural Fiber Composites Against Ballistic Impact: A Review
7. Oliveira, M.S., Luz, F.S.d., Teixeira Souza, A., Demosthenes, L.C.d.C., Pereira, A.C., Filho, F.d.C.G., Braga, F.d.O., Figueiredo, A.B.-H.d.S., and Monteiro, S.N. (2020). Tucum Fiber from Amazon Astrocaryum Vulgare Palm Tree: Novel Reinforcement for Polymer Composites. Polymers, 12.10.3390/polym12102259 ↗
8. Neves, P.P., Costa, U.O., Bezerra, W.B.A., Figueiredo, A.B.-H.d.S., Monteiro, S.N., and Nascimento, L.F.C. (2022). Dynamic and Ballistic Performance of Uni- and Bidirectional Pineapple Leaf Fibers (PALF)-Reinforced Epoxy Composites Functionalized with Graphene Oxide. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14163249 ↗
9. Souza, A.T., Neuba, L.d.M., Junio, R.F.P., Carvalho, M.T., Candido, V.S., Figueiredo, A.B.-H.d.S., Monteiro, S.N., Nascimento, L.F.C., and da Silva, A.C.R. (2022). Ballistic Properties and Izod Impact Resistance of Novel Epoxy Composites Reinforced with Caranan Fiber (Mauritiella Armata). Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14163348 ↗
10. Comparative Investigation of Mechanical Properties in Banana Fiber and Ramie Fiber Composites Enhanced by SiC Nanoparticles10.1063/5.0207560 ↗
11. Mechanical Properties of Banyan Fiber-Reinforced Sawdust Nanofiller Particulate Hybrid Polymer Composite10.1155/2022/9475468 ↗
12. Vallejos, M.E., Vilaseca, F., Méndez, J.A., Espinach, F.X., Aguado, R.J., Delgado-Aguilar, M., and Mutjé, P. (2023). Response of Polypropylene Composites Reinforced with Natural Fibers: Impact Strength and Water-Uptake Behaviors. Polymers, 15.10.3390/polym15040900 ↗
13. Wu, S., Guo, M., Zhao, J., Wu, Q., Zhuang, J., and Jiang, X. (2022). Characterization of the Mechanical and Morphological Properties of Cow Dung Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites: A Comparative Study with Corn Stalk Fiber Composites and Sisal Fiber Composites. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14225041 ↗
14. Mechanical, thermal, and viscoelastic behavior of sisal fibre-based structural composites for automotive applications: Experimental and FEM analysis10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117427 ↗
15. Srinivasan, N.P., Mahilan, M.E., Vigneshwaran, S., Vijayaraghavan, P., Aravinth, S., Gokulakrishna, R., and Mukesh, P. (2023). Experimental investigation on no fines concrete by addition of natural fibres. E3S Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences.
16. Propriedade da Fibra de Coco: Uma Revisão Sistemática10.17921/1415-5141.2020v24n1p34-38 ↗
17. Fabrication and characterization of lignocellulosic coconut and energy reed straw-reinforced methylene diphenyl diisocyanate-bonded sustainable insulation panels10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.134992 ↗
18. Effect of surface modification of sisal fibers on water absorption and mechanical properties of polyaniline composite10.1002/pc.24462 ↗
19. Experimental study of physical, chemical and mechanical properties of enset and sisal fibers10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107453 ↗
20. Sugarcane bagasse fiber reinforced composites: Recent advances and applications10.1080/23311916.2020.1823159 ↗
21. A short review on polyurethane polymer composite10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.481 ↗
22. Natural fillers as reinforcement for closed-molded polyurethane foam plaques: Mechanical, morphological, and thermal properties10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102187 ↗
23. Sugarcane bagasse—A source of cellulosic fiber for diverse applications10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07771 ↗
24. Nurazzi, N.M., Asyraf, M.R.M., Fatimah Athiyah, S., Shazleen, S.S., Rafiqah, S.A., Harussani, M.M., Kamarudin, S.H., Razman, M.R., Rahmah, M., and Zainudin, E.S. (2021). A Review on Mechanical Performance of Hybrid Natural Fiber Polymer Composites for Structural Applications. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13132170 ↗
25. A Review on Mechanical Behavior of Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites and Its Applications10.1177/0731684419828524 ↗
26. High Fidelity Simulation of the Mechanical Behavior of Closed-Cell Polyurethane Foams10.1016/j.jmps.2019.103814 ↗
27. Natural Fiber Reinforced Polyurethane Composite
28. Effect of Alkali Treatment on Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Kenaf Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastic Polyurethane Composite10.1007/s10973-012-2258-x ↗
29. Sonnenschein, M. (2021). Polyurethanes: Science, Technology, Markets, and Trends, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781119669401 ↗
30. Development and Characterization of Sawdust and Sisal Fiber Reinforced Vegetable Based Polyurethane Foam Hybrid Composites10.1080/15440478.2020.1841067 ↗
31. ABNT (2015). Veículos Rodoviários Automotores—Capacete e Viseiras para Condutores e Passageiros de Motocicletas e Veículos Similares—Requisitos de Desempenho e Métodos de Ensaio (Standard No. NBR 7471:2015).
32. (2021). Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Protective Helmets and of Their Visors for Drivers and Passengers of Motorcycles and Mopeds (Standard No. ECE 22. 06).
33. (2022). Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Protective Helmets and Their Visors for Drivers and Passengers of Motorcycles and Mopeds (Standard No. ECE 22. 05).
34. An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591 ↗
35. Power Comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling Tests
36. Comparison of Different Approaches for Detection and Treatment of Outliers in Meter Proving Factors Determination10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2016.02.002 ↗
37. Zou, M., and Djokic, S. (2020). A Review of Approaches for the Detection and Treatment of Outliers in Processing Wind Turbine and Wind Farm Measurements. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13164228 ↗
38. Data reconciliation applied to the conformity assessment of fuel products10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120936 ↗