journal article·2025-01-10Open access

Seismic Prediction of Porosity in the Norne Field: Utilizing Support Vector Regression and Empirical Models Driven by Bayesian Linearized Inversion

Jorge A. Teruya Monroe, Jose J. S. de Figueiredo, Carlos E. S. Amanajas

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 2

Abstract

This work aims to improve the characterization of petrophysical properties by accurately estimating subsurface porosity using seismic and well data. The study includes Bayesian Linearized Inversion to obtain elastic parameters (e.g., compressional e shear wave velocities and densities). This reduces processing uncertainty and provides a reliable substitute for the standard Amplitude versus Offset inversion method. Furthermore, incorporating sparse spike wavelets with Bayesian Linearized Inversion refines the inversion output, facilitating the extraction of petrophysical properties. Combined with log data from seventeen wells, these inverted parameters serve as inputs for two porosity prediction models: the empirical Han’s equation and a more adaptable Support Vector Regression model, the latter demonstrating superior precision in most cases due to its flexible fitting and calibration capabilities. Results from the Norne field in the North Sea confirm the approach’s viability, with the Support Vector Regression model achieving a significant Pearson correlation coefficient of 90% in porosity prediction, underscoring the potential of machine learning techniques in improving subsurface exploration results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geofísica, Universidade Federal do Pará, Rua Augusto Correa, 01, Belém 66075-110, PA, Brazil

Petrophysics, and Rock Physics Laboratory, Faculty of Geophysics, Federal University of Pará (UFPA), Belém 66075-110, PA, Brazil

National Institute of Science and Technology of Petroleum Geophysics, Room 206-E, Ondina University Campus, Salvador 40170-115, BA, Brazil

Funding

CAPES · CNPq · PROPESP-UFPA

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Reservoir facies and porosity modeling using seismic data and well logs by geostatistical simulation in an oil field10.1007/s13146-020-00605-5 ↗
2. Serra, O. (1984). Fundamentals of Well-log Interpretation: The acquisition of logging data. The Acquisition of Logging Data, Elsevier. Developments in Sedimentology.
3. Unexpected behavior of logging-while-drilling neutron porosity logs in water-wet, sand-shale sequences10.1190/INT-2016-0145.1 ↗
4. Selley, R. (1998). Elements of Petroleum Geology, Elsevier Science.
5. Geofluid discrimination incorporating poroelasticity and seismic reflection inversion10.1007/s10712-015-9330-6 ↗
6. Aleardi, M., Ciabarri, F., Peruzzo, F., Garcea, B., and Mazzotti, A. (June, January 30). Bayesian Estimation of Reservoir Properties by Means of Wide-angle AVA Inversion and a Petrophysical Zoeppritz Equation. Proceedings of the 78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2016, Vienna, Austria.10.3997/2214-4609.201601551 ↗
7. Aleardi, M., Ciabarri, F., Gukov, T., Giussani, M., and Mazzotti, A. (2017, January 12–15). A Single-step Bayesian Petrophysical Inversion Algorithm Based on a Petrophysical Reformulation of the P-wave Reflection Coefficients. Proceedings of the 79th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2017, Paris, France.10.3997/2214-4609.201700902 ↗
8. Direct geostatistical seismic amplitude versus angle inversion for shale rock properties10.1109/TGRS.2020.3017091 ↗
9. A one-step Bayesian inversion framework for 3D reservoir characterization based on a Gaussian mixture model—A Norwegian Sea demonstration10.1190/geo2020-0094.1 ↗
10. Su, Z., Cao, J., Xiang, T., Fu, J., and Shi, S. (2023). Seismic prediction of porosity in tight reservoirs based on transformer. Front. Earth Sci., 11.10.3389/feart.2023.1137645 ↗
11. Porosity inversion by Caianiello neural networks with Levenberg–Marquardt optimization10.1190/INT-2016-0119.1 ↗
12. Geophysical pore type inversion in carbonate reservoir: Integration of cores, well logs, and seismic data (Yadana field, offshore Myanmar)10.1190/geo2020-0486.1 ↗
13. Nonlinear petrophysical amplitude variation with offset inversion with spatially variable pore aspect ratio10.1190/geo2021-0583.1 ↗
14. Estimation of reservoir porosity based on seismic inversion results using deep learning methods10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103270 ↗
15. Bayesian seismic inversion for stratigraphic horizon, lithology, and fluid prediction10.1190/geo2019-0170.1 ↗
16. Generalized nonlinear inverse problems solved using the least squares criterion10.1029/RG020i002p00219 ↗
17. Bayesian estimation in seismic inversion. Part I: Principles10.1111/j.1365-2478.1988.tb02198.x ↗
18. Prior information and uncertainty in inverse problems10.1190/1.1444930 ↗
19. Bayesian linearized rock-physics inversion10.1190/geo2016-0161.1 ↗
20. Joint Bayesian inversion based on rock-physics prior modeling for the estimation of spatially correlated reservoir properties10.1190/geo2017-0463.1 ↗
21. Bayesian linearized rock-physics amplitude-variation-with-offset inversion for petrophysical and pore-geometry parameters in carbonate reservoirs10.1190/geo2022-0671.1 ↗
22. Enhancement of Bayesian Seismic Inversion Using Machine Learning and Sparse Spike Wavelet: Case Study Norne Field Dataset
23. Statistical rock physics: Combining rock physics, information theory, and geostatistics to reduce uncertainty in seismic reservoir characterization10.1190/1.1438938 ↗
24. Seismic screening for hydrocarbon prospects using rock-physics attributes10.1190/tle33030266.1 ↗
25. Bayesian linearized AVO inversion10.1190/1.1543206 ↗
26. Han, D. (1986). Effects of Porosity and Clay Content on Acoustic Properties of Sandstones and Unconsolidated Sediments. [Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University].10.1190/1.1893163 ↗
27. Hybrid Global Stochastic and Bayesian Linearized Acoustic Seismic Inversion Methodology10.1109/TGRS.2017.2692388 ↗
28. Zalta, E.N. (2021). Bayes’ Theorem. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. [Fall 2021 ed.].
29. On the seismic wavelet estimative and reflectivity recovering based on linear inversion: Well-to-seismic tie on a real data set from Viking Graben, North Sea10.1190/geo2019-0183.1 ↗
30. Hierarchical Bayesian lithology/fluid prediction: A North Sea case study10.1190/geo2011-0202.1 ↗
31. Bayesian Gaussian Mixture Linear Inversion for Geophysical Inverse Problems10.1007/s11004-016-9671-9 ↗
32. Migration and inversion of seismic data10.1190/1.1441877 ↗
33. Aki, K., and Richards, P.G. (2002). Quantitative Seismology, University Science Books. [2nd ed.].
34. Probabilistic petrophysical-properties estimation integrating statistical rock physics with seismic inversion10.1190/1.3386676 ↗
35. Andreson, T. (1984). An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, A. John & Sons Inc.
36. Reservoir parameters estimation from well log and core data: A case study from the North Sea10.1144/petgeo.8.1.63 ↗
37. Reservoir characterization using electrofacies analysis in the sandstone reservoir of the Norne Field (offshore Norway)10.1144/petgeo2015-056 ↗
38. Qualitative time-lapse seismic interpretation of Norne Field to assess challenges of 4D seismic attributes10.1190/tle37100754.1 ↗
39. Umar, A., Aqsa, A., Wanzhong, S., Ren, W., Muhammad, A., Ren, J., Hung, V.T., Ibrar, I., Zhang, X., and Zhang, H. (2022). Estimation of porosity and facies distribution through seismic inversion in an unconventional tight sandstone reservoir of Hangjinqi area, Ordos basin. Front. Earth Sci., 10.10.3389/feart.2022.1014052 ↗
40. Constrained sparse spike inversion applied in the reservoir prediction
41. Stochastic sparse-spike deconvolution10.1190/1.2790584 ↗
42. Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures10.1021/ac60214a047 ↗
43. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
44. Vapnik, V. (1999). The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4757-3264-1 ↗
45. Support vector regression for porosity prediction in a heterogeneous reservoir a comparative study10.1016/j.cageo.2010.03.022 ↗
46. Combination of support vector regression and artificial neural networks for prediction of critical heat flux10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.03.025 ↗
47. Fuzzy support vector regression machine with penalizing Gaussian noises on triangular fuzzy number space10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.061 ↗
48. A distributed PSO–SVM hybrid system with feature selection and parameter optimization10.1016/j.asoc.2007.10.007 ↗
49. A GA-based feature selection and parameters optimizationfor support vector machines10.1016/j.eswa.2005.09.024 ↗
50. Facing the classification of binary problems with a GSA-SVM hybrid system10.1016/j.mcm.2011.06.048 ↗
51. Application of the PSO–SVM model for recognition of control chart patterns10.1016/j.isatra.2010.06.005 ↗
52. Evolutionary tuning of multiple SVM parameters10.1016/j.neucom.2004.11.022 ↗