Part B: Innovative Data Augmentation Approach to Boost Machine Learning for Hydrodynamic Purposes—Computational Efficiency
Source abstract
Abstract
The increasing influence of AI across various scientific domains has prompted engineering to embark on new explorations. However, studies often overlook the foundational aspects of the maritime field, leading to over-optimistic or oversimplified outputs for real-world applications. We previously highlighted the sensitivity of trained models to noise, the importance of computational efficiency, and the need for feature engineering/compactness in hydrodynamic models due to the stochastic nature of waves. A novel data analysis framework was introduced with two purposes to augment data for machine learning (ML) models: transferring features from high-fidelity to low-fidelity surrogates and enhancing simulation data and increasing computational efficiency. The current issue addresses the second objectives. Wave-induced response time series data from experiments on a spherical model under various wave conditions were analyzed using continuous wavelet transform to extract spectral-temporal features. These features were then reorganized into a new feature map and augmented with additional endogenous features to enhance their uniqueness. Different ML models were trained; the new framework substantially reduced training costs while maintaining fair accuracy, with training times slashed from hours to seconds. The significance of the current study extends beyond the maritime context and can be utilized for ML applications in intrinsically stochastic data.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods · Oil and Gas Production Techniques · Computational Physics and Python Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Maritime Engineering and Hydrodynamics, Australian Maritime College, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250, Australia
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Faltinsen, O. (1993). Sea Loads on Ships and Offshore Structures, Cambridge University Press.10.4043/7142-MS ↗
2. Part B: A review of the real-time sea-state estimation, using wave buoy analogy; a decuple benchmark and future outlook10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111020 ↗
3. Tangirala, A.K. (2018). Principles of System Identification Theory and Practice, Taylor & Francis.10.1201/9781315222509 ↗
4. Thompson, N., Greenewald, K., Lee, K., and Manso, G.F. (2022). The computational limits of deep learning. arXiv.
5. Thompson, N. (IEEE Spectrum, 2021). Deep Learning Diminishing Returns, IEEE Spectrum.
6. Machine learning on big data: Opportunities and challenges10.1016/j.neucom.2017.01.026 ↗
7. Majidiyan, H., Enshaei, H., Howe, D., and Gubesch, E. (2025). Part A: Innovative Data Augmentation Approach to Enhance Machine Learning Efficiency—Case Study for Hydrodynamic Purposes. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15010346 ↗
8. A survey of the opportunities and challenges of supervised machine learning in maritime risk analysis10.1080/01441647.2022.2036864 ↗
9. A deep learning method for the prediction of 6-DoF ship motions in real conditions
10. Prediction of seakeeping in the early stage of conventional monohull vessels design using artificial neural network
11. A comparison of physics-informed data-driven modeling architectures for ship motion predictions10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115608 ↗
12. Song, Y., and Tian, X. (2023). Machine Learning for Short-Term Prediction of Ship Motion Combined with Wave Input. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13095298 ↗
13. Time-series forecasting for ships maneuvering in waves via recurrent-type neural networks10.1007/s40722-022-00255-w ↗
14. A machine learning method for the prediction of ship motion trajectories in real operational conditions10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114905 ↗
15. Majidiyan, H., and Enshaei, H. (2023, January 11–16). Augmented Adaptive Filter for Real-Time Sea State Estimation Using Vessel Motions Through Deep Learning. Proceedings of the ASME 2023 42nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE42), Melbourne, Australia.10.1115/OMAE2023-104286 ↗
16. Mittendorf, M., and Nielsen, U.D. (2022, January 26–28). The prediction of sea state parameters by deep learning techniques using ship motion data. Proceedings of the 7th World Maritime Technology Conference (WMTC’22), Copenhagen, Denmark.
17. SAFENESS: A Semi-Supervised Transfer Learning Approach for Sea State Estimation Using Ship Motion Data10.1109/TITS.2023.3326281 ↗
18. A Novel Densely Connected Convolutional Neural Network for Sea-State Estimation Using Ship Motion Data10.1109/TIM.2020.2967115 ↗
19. Livni, R., and Shalev-Shwartz, S. (2014, January 8–13). On the computational efficiency of training neural networks. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’14), Montreal, QC, Canada.
20. Thompson, N.C. (2024, February 20). Here’s How to Make Deep Learning More Sustainable. IEEE Spectrum, Available online: https://spectrum.ieee.org/deep-learning-sustainability.
21. ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003 ↗
22. Prasad, L. (2023, January 27–30). The Building Blocks in Autonomous Shipping and Their Challenges. Proceedings of the International Conference on Maritime Autonomy and Remote Navigation (ICMAR NAV 2023), Launceston, Australia.
23. Majidiyan, H., and Enshaei, H. Real-Time Sea State Estimation Using Deep Transfer Learning; an Integrated Framework. Res. Sq., 2024.10.21203/rs.3.rs-3826677/v1 ↗
24. Lee, U.-J., Jeong, W.-M., and Cho, H.-Y. (2022). Estimation and Analysis of JONSWAP Spectrum Parameter Using Observed Data around Korean Coast. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10.10.3390/jmse10050578 ↗
25. Kennedy, O. (2022). An Alternative Mooring Tension Prediction Method Using a Neural Network. [Engineering Honor Degree Thesis, NCMEH, Australian Maritime College, University of Tasmania].
26. Pols, A., Gubesch, E., Abdussamie, N., Penesis, I., and Chin, C. (2021). Mooring Analysis of a Floating OWC Wave Energy Converter. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 9.10.3390/jmse9020228 ↗
27. Generalized morse wavelets10.1109/TSP.2002.804066 ↗
28. MATLAB (2024, February 20). Morse Wavelets. Available online: https://au.mathworks.com/help/wavelet/ug/morse-wavelets.html.
29. Majidiyan, H., and Enshaei, H. (2024). An Integrated Framework for Real-Time Sea-State Estimation of Stationary Marine Units Using Wave Buoy Analogy. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 12.10.21203/rs.3.rs-4463215/v1 ↗
30. Studies in crop variation. I. An examination of the yield of dressed grain from Broadbalk10.1017/S0021859600003750 ↗
31. A brute-force spectral approach for wave estimation using measured vessel motions10.1016/j.marstruc.2018.03.011 ↗
32. Part A: A review of the real-time sea-state estimation, using wave buoy analogy10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111684 ↗