Show source-provided references
3. Lu, W., Zhou, Y., Yu, J., and Jia, C. (February, January 27). Concept extraction and prerequisite relation learning from educational data. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Honolulu, HI, USA.
4. A review of the trends and challenges in adopting natural language processing methods for education feedback analysis
10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3177752 ↗6. Zhou, Y., Guo, C., Wang, X., Chang, Y., and Wu, Y. (2024). A survey on data augmentation in large model era. arXiv.
7. Li, Y., Liu, J., and Yang, S. (2023, January 13–15). Is ChatGPT a Good Middle School Teacher? An Exploration of its Role in Instructional Design. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on New Media Development and Modernized Education, NMDME 2023, Xi’an, China.
8. Mintz, M., Bills, S., Snow, R., and Jurafsky, D. (2009, January 2–7). Distant Supervision for Relation Extraction without Labeled Data. Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, Singapore. ACL ’09.
10.3115/1690219.1690287 ↗9. A review of generalized zero-shot learning methods
10. Song, C.H., Wu, J., Washington, C., Sadler, B.M., Chao, W.L., and Su, Y. (2023, January 2–6). Llm-planner: Few-shot grounded planning for embodied agents with large language models. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Paris, France.
10.1109/ICCV51070.2023.00280 ↗11. A comprehensive survey on relation extraction: Recent advances and new frontiers
10.1145/3674501 ↗12. Rule-based classification systems using classification and regression tree (CART) analysis
13. Qin, B., Xia, Y., Prabhakar, S., and Tu, Y. (April, January 29). A rule-based classification algorithm for uncertain data. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE 25th International Conference on Data Engineering, Shanghai, China.
10.1109/ICDE.2009.164 ↗14. Automatic extraction of semantic relations between medical entities: A rule based approach
15. Li, J., Zhou, M., Qi, G., Lao, N., Ruan, T., and Du, J. (2017, January 26–29). A Survey on Relation Extraction. Proceedings of the Knowledge Graph and Semantic Computing. Language, Knowledge, and Intelligence, Chengdu, China.
10.1007/978-981-10-7359-5 ↗16. Improving Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction by Natural Language Inference
17. Rogers, A., Boyd-Graber, J., and Okazaki, N. (2023, January 9–14). Linguistic representations for fewer-shot relation extraction across domains. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Toronto, ON, Canada.
18. Rethinking generalization in few-shot classification
19. Rogers, A., Boyd-Graber, J., and Okazaki, N. (2023, January 9–14). Revisiting Relation Extraction in the era of Large Language Models. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Toronto, ON, Canada.
20. Sadat Moosavi, N., Gurevych, I., Hou, Y., Kim, G., Kim, Y.J., Schuster, T., and Agrawal, A. (2023, January 13). How to Unleash the Power of Large Language Models for Few-shot Relation Extraction?. Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Simple and Efficient Natural Language Processing (SustaiNLP), Toronto, ON, Canada.
21. Li, B., Fang, G., Yang, Y., Wang, Q., Ye, W., Zhao, W., and Zhang, S. (2023). Evaluating ChatGPT’s Information Extraction Capabilities: An Assessment of Performance, Explainability, Calibration, and Faithfulness. arXiv.
22. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback
23. Suresh, A., Jacobs, J., Harty, C., Perkoff, M., Martin, J.H., and Sumner, T. (2022). The TalkMoves dataset: K-12 mathematics lesson transcripts annotated for teacher and student discursive moves. arXiv.
24. van der Lee, C., Krahmer, E., and Wubben, S. (2018, January 5–8). Automated learning of templates for data-to-text generation: Comparing rule-based, statistical and neural methods. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Natural Language Generation, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
10.18653/v1/W18-6504 ↗25. Brown, T.B. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. arXiv.
26. Burstein, J., Doran, C., and Solorio, T. (2019, January 2–7). BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), Minneapolis, MN, USA.
27. Moens, M.F., Huang, X., Specia, L., and Yih, S.W.t. (2021, January 16–20). REBEL: Relation Extraction By End-to-end Language generation. Proceedings of the Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021, Punta Cana, Dominican Republic.
28. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners
29. Shang, Y.M., Huang, H., and Mao, X. (March, January 22). OneRel: Joint Entity and Relation Extraction with One Module in One Step. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Virtual.
30. Jurafsky, D., Chai, J., Schluter, N., and Tetreault, J. (2020, January 5–10). A Novel Cascade Binary Tagging Framework for Relational Triple Extraction. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Online.
31. Team, G., Anil, R., Borgeaud, S., Alayrac, J.B., Yu, J., Soricut, R., Schalkwyk, J., Dai, A.M., Hauth, A., and Millican, K. (2023). Gemini: A family of highly capable multimodal models. arXiv.
32. Models, C. (2024, November 28). Model Card and Evaluations for Claude Models. Available online: https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/bd2a28d2535bfb0494cc8e2a3bf135d2e7523226/Model-Card-Claude-2.pdf.
33. (2024, August 16). OpenAI. GPT-4o. Available online: https://chatgpt.com/.