Design of a Multi-Vision System for a Three-Dimensional Mug Shot Model to Improve Forensic Facial Identification
Source abstract
Abstract
A traditional mug shot is a front and side view of a person from the shoulder up, taken by law enforcement. Forensic science is exploring the benefit of working with 3D data offered by new technologies, and there is an increasing need to work with 3D mug shots. Among the various available techniques, a multi-view photogrammetric approach achieves the highest accuracy in the shortest acquisition time. In this work, a multi-view photogrammetric system for facial reconstruction based on low-cost cameras is developed with the aims of verifying the performance of such cameras for the production of a 3D mug shot with submillimetre accuracy and assessing the improvement of facial matching using a 3D mug shot over traditional 2D mug shots. The tests were carried out in both a virtual and a real-world environment, using either a virtual or a 3D-printed 3D model. The outcome is a point cloud, which describes the face. The quantitative analysis of the errors was realized through the distances between the mesh of the acquired 3D model and the point cloud. A total of 80% of the points with a distance of less than ±1 mm was obtained. Finally, the performance on facial recognition of the 3D mug shot is evaluated against the traditional 2D mug shot using the NeoFace Watching software (NeoFACE) with a score increment of up to 0.42 points, especially in scenarios where the suspect is not captured from a frontal view.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Face recognition and analysis · Biometric Identification and Security
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile Edile Ambientale, Sapienza University of Rome, 00184 Roma, Italy
Comando Carabinieri Tutela Ambientale, 00100 Roma, Italy
Reparto Investigazioni Scientifiche Roma, 00191 Roma, Italy
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Automated face recognition in forensic science: Review and perspectives10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.110124 ↗
2. ENFSI (2024, October 05). Best Practice Manual for Facial Image Comparison. ENFSI-BMP-DI-01. Version 01—January 2018. Available online: https://enfsi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/ENFSI-BPM-DI-01.pdf.
3. FICWG (2024, October 05). Facial Image Comparison Feature List for Morphological Analysis, version 2.0; 11 September 2018. Available online: https://fiswg.org/FISWG_Morph_Analysis_Feature_List_v2.0_20180911.pdf.
4. 3D forensic science: A new field integrating 3D imaging and 3Dprinting in crime reconstruction10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100205 ↗
5. Jain, A.K., Klare, B., and Park, U. (2012). Face Matching and Retrieval in Forensic Applications. IEEE Multimed., 19.10.1109/MMUL.2012.4 ↗
6. Schipper, J.A.M., Merema, B.J., Hollander, M.H.J., Spijkervet, F.K.L., Dijkstra, P.U., Jansma, J., Schepers, R.H., and Kraeima, J. (2024). Reliability and validity of handheld structured light scanners and a static stereophotogrammetry system in facial three-dimensional surface imaging. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-57370-x ↗
7. Accuracy and reliability of 3D stereo- photogrammetry: A comparison to direct anthropometry and 2D photogrammetry10.2319/041415-244.1 ↗
8. van Dam, C., Veldhuis, R., and Spreeuwers, L. (2012, January 24–25). Towards 3d facial reconstruction from uncalibrated cctv footage. Proceedings of the Information Theory in the Benelux and the 2nd Joint WIC/IEEE Symposium on Information Theory and Signal Processing in the Benelux, Boekelo, The Netherlands.
9. Face reconstruction from image sequences for forensic face comparison10.1049/iet-bmt.2015.0036 ↗
10. Zhang, B., Li, Y., Li, X., Liu, D., Li, Z., and Sun, X. A Review of Research on 3D Face Reconstruction Methods. Proceedings of the ICIIT ‘24: Proceedings of the 2024 9th International Conference on Intelligent Information Technology, New York, NY, USA, 23–25 February 2024.
11. La Cava, S.M., Orrù, G., Goldmann, T., Drahansky, M., and Marcialis, G.L. (2022, January 21–25). 3D Face Reconstruction for Forensic Recognition—A Survey. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/ICPR56361.2022.9956031 ↗
12. Kraus, K. (1993). Volume 1: Fundamentals and Standard Processes. Photogrammetry, Dummler.
13. (2024, July 24). Xangle Studio. Available online: https://xangle3d.com.
14. 3D digital stereophotogrammetry: A practical guide to facial image acquisition10.1186/1746-160X-6-18 ↗
15. (2024, July 24). 3dMD. Available online: https://3dmd.com.
16. Completing the 3-dimensional picture10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.023 ↗
17. Accuracy and precision of a 3D anthropometric facial analysis with and without landmark labelling before image acquisition10.2319/041810-210.1 ↗
18. (2024, July 24). Botscan by Botspot. Available online: https://botspot.de/botscan-neo/.
19. Comparison of forensic photo-documentation to a photogrammetric solution using the multi-camera system “Botscan”10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.04.012 ↗
20. 3D mug shot—3D head models from photogrammetry for forensic identification10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.04.015 ↗
21. (2024, July 20). Rasberry. Available online: https://www.raspberrypi.com/products/raspberry-pi-high-quality-camera/.
22. (2024, July 12). Stratsys. Available online: https://pdf.aeroexpo.online/pdf/stratasys-gmbh/j750-spec-sheet/170653-5605-_3.html.
23. (2024, July 29). 3DStudioMax. Available online: https://www.autodesk.com/products/3ds-max/features.
24. (2024, July 29). Agisoft Metashape. Available online: www.agisoft.com.
25. (2024, July 29). Open Source Project CloudCompare. Available online: www.cloudcompare.org.
26. (2024, April 16). NEC. Available online: https://www.nec.com/en/global/solutions/biometrics/face/neofacewatch.html.