journal article·2024-09-07Open access

Exploring the Effectiveness of Shallow and L2 Learner-Suitable Textual Features for Supervised and Unsupervised Sentence-Based Readability Assessment

Dimitris Kostadimas, Katia Lida Kermanidis, Theodore Andronikos

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 17

Abstract

Simplicity in information found online is in demand from diverse user groups seeking better text comprehension and consumption of information in an easy and timely manner. Readability assessment, particularly at the sentence level, plays a vital role in aiding specific demographics, such as language learners. In this paper, we research model evaluation metrics, strategies for model creation, and the predictive capacity of features and feature sets in assessing readability based on sentence complexity. Our primary objective is to classify sentences as either simple or complex, shifting the focus from entire paragraphs or texts to individual sentences. We approach this challenge as both a classification and clustering task. Additionally, we emphasize our tests on shallow features that, despite their simplistic nature and ease of use, seem to yield decent results. Leveraging the TextStat Python library and the WEKA toolkit, we employ a wide variety of shallow features and classifiers. By comparing the outcomes across different models, algorithms, and feature sets, we aim to offer valuable insights into optimizing the setup. We draw our data from sentences sourced from Wikipedia’s corpus, a widely accessed online encyclopedia catering to a broad audience. We strive to take a deeper look at what leads to greater readability classification in datasets that appeal to audiences such as Wikipedia’s, assisting in the development of improved models and new features for future applications with low feature extraction/processing times.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Text Readability and Simplification · Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare · Natural Language Processing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Informatics, Ionian University, 7 Tsirigoti Square, 49100 Corfu, Greece

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Zervopoulos, A., Alvanou, A.G., Bezas, K., Papamichail, A., Maragoudakis, M., and Kermanidis, K. (2020). Hong Kong Protests: Using Natural Language Processing for Fake News Detection on Twitter. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-49186-4_34 ↗
2. Nikiforos, M.N., Deliveri, K., Kermanidis, K.L., and Pateli, A. (2022, January 3–4). Machine Learning on Wikipedia Text for the Automatic Identification of Vocational Domains of Significance for Displaced Communities. Proceedings of the 2022 17th International Workshop on Semantic and Social Media Adaptation & Personalization (SMAP), Corfu, Greece.10.1109/SMAP56125.2022.9941803 ↗
3. Mouratidis, D., and Kermanidis, K. (2019). Ensemble and Deep Learning for Language-Independent Automatic Selection of Parallel Data. Algorithms, 12.10.3390/a12010026 ↗
4. Zhang, L., Liu, Z., and Ni, J. (2013, January 20–22). Feature-Based Assessment of Text Readability. Proceedings of the 2013 Seventh International Conference on Internet Computing for Engineering and Science, Shanghai, China.10.1109/ICICSE.2013.18 ↗
5. Feng, L., Jansche, M., Huenerfauth, M., and Elhadad, N. (2010, January 23–27). A Comparison of Features for Automatic Readability Assessment. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING ’10, Beijing China.
6. Kauchak, D., Mouradi, O., Pentoney, C., and Leroy, G. (2014, January 6–9). Text Simplification Tools: Using Machine Learning to Discover Features that Identify Difficult Text. Proceedings of the 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, HI, USA.10.1109/HICSS.2014.330 ↗
7. Trokhymovych, M., Sen, I., and Gerlach, M. (2024). An Open Multilingual System for Scoring Readability of Wikipedia. arXiv.10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.342 ↗
8. Xia, M., Kochmar, E., and Briscoe, T. (2016, January 16). Text Readability Assessment for Second Language Learners. Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications. Association for Computational Linguistics, San Diego, CA, USA.10.18653/v1/W16-0502 ↗
9. Vajjala, S., and Meurers, D. (2014, January 26–30). Assessing the relative reading level of sentence pairs for text simplification. Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Gothenburg, Sweden.10.3115/v1/E14-1031 ↗
10. (2023, November 05). CohMetrix Online Tool. Available online: http://cohmetrix.com/.
11. Lijun, F. (2010). Automatic Readability Assessment. [Ph.D. Thesis, The City University of New York].
12. Frank, E., Hall, M.A., and Witten, I.H. (2016). The WEKA Workbench. Online Appendix for Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, Morgan Kaufmann. [4th ed.].
13. Readability assessment for text simplification: From analysing documents to identifying sentential simplifications10.1075/itl.165.2.04vaj ↗
14. Readability indices do not say it all on a text readability10.3390/analytics2020016 ↗
15. Stajner, S., Evans, R., Orasan, C., and Mitkov, R. (2012, January 27). What can readability measures really tell us about text complexity?. Proceedings of the Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Improving Textual Accessibility, Istanbul, Turkey.
16. Aluisio, S., Specia, L., Gasperin, C., and Scarton, C. (2010, January 5). Readability Assessment for Text Simplification. Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Fifth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
17. Vajjala, S., and Meurers, D. (2013, January 8). On The Applicability of Readability Models to Web Texts. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Predicting and Improving Text Readability for Target Reader Populations, Sofia, Bulgaria.
18. Napoles, C., and Dredze, M. (2010, January 6). Learning Simple Wikipedia: A Cogitation in Ascertaining Abecedarian Language. Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Writing: Writing Processes and Authoring Aids, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
19. Automated Text Simplification: A Survey
20. Cha, M., Gwon, Y., and Kung, H.T. (2017). Language Modeling by Clustering with Word Embeddings for Text Readability Assessment. arXiv.10.1145/3132847.3133104 ↗
21. Wojtkiewicz, K., Treur, J., Pimenidis, E., and Maleszka, M. (2021). Is Wikipedia Easy to Understand?: A Study Beyond Conventional Readability Metrics. Advances in Computational Collective Intelligence, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference, ICCCI 2023, Budapest, Hungary, 27–29 September 2023, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-88113-9 ↗
22. Isaksson, F. (2023, February 02). Is Simple Wikipedia Simple?—A Study of Readability and Guidelines. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:208050433.
23. Jatowt, A., and Tanaka, K. (November, January 29). Is Wikipedia too difficult? Comparative analysis of readability of Wikipedia, simple Wikipedia and Britannica. Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Maui, HI, USA.
24. Bansal, S., and Aggarwal, C. (2023, November 05). Textstat on PyPI. Available online: https://pypi.org/project/textstat/.
25. McAlpine, R. (2023, February 02). From Plain English to Global English. Available online: https://www.angelfire.com/nd/nirmaldasan/journalismonline/fpetge.html.
26. On the Failure of Readability Formulas to Define Readable Texts: A Case Study from Adaptations10.2307/747483 ↗
27. Feng, L., Elhadad, N., and Huenerfauth, M. (April, January 30). Cognitively Motivated Features for Readability Assessment. Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL (EACL 2009), Athens, Greece.10.3115/1609067.1609092 ↗
28. Collins-Thompson, K., and Callan, J.P. (2004, January 2–7). A Language Modeling Approach to Predicting Reading Difficulty. Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: HLT-NAACL 2004, Boston, MA, USA.
29. Kauchak, D. (2023, November 05). Simple English Wikipedia: A New Simplification Task—Wikipeda Pages Data-Set. Available online: http://www.cs.pomona.edu/~dkauchak/simplification/.
30. Coster, W., and Kauchak, D. (2011, January 19–24). Simple English Wikipedia: A New Text Simplification Task. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Portland, OR, USA.
31. (2023, November 05). Wikipedia: The Free Online Encyclopedia. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page.
32. Barzilay, R., and Elhadad, N. (2003, January 11–12). Sentence Alignment for Monolingual Comparable Corpora. Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Sapporo, Japan.10.3115/1119355.1119359 ↗
33. alxwrd, S. (2023, November 05). Textstat the Easy to Use Library to Calculate Statistics from Text. Available online: https://github.com/textstat/textstat.
34. Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language10.3758/BF03195564 ↗
35. The Tool for the Automatic Analysis of Cohesion 2.0: Integrating semantic similarity and text overlap10.3758/s13428-018-1142-4 ↗
36. Kyle, K. (2016). Measuring Syntactic Development in L2 Writing: Fine Grained Indices of Syntactic Complexity and Usage-Based Indices of Syntactic Sophistication. [Ph.D. Thesis, Georgia State University].