Parameter Calibration and Verification of Elastoplastic Wet Sand Based on Attention-Retention Fusion Deep Learning Mechanism
Source abstract
Abstract
The discrete element method (DEM) is a vital numerical approach for analyzing the mechanical behavior of elastoplastic wet sand. However, parameter uncertainty persists within the mapping between constitutive relationships and inherent model parameters. We propose a Parameter calibration neural network based on Attention, Retention, and improved Transformer for Sequential data (PartsNet), which effectively captures the nonlinear mechanical behavior of wet sand and obtains the optimal parameter combination for the Edinburgh elasto-plastic adhesion constitutive model. Variational autoencoder-based principal component ordering is employed by PartsNet to reduce the high-dimensional dynamic response and extract critical parameters along with their weights. Gated recurrent units are combined with a novel sparse multi-head attention mechanism to process sequential data. The fusion information is delivered by residual multilayer perceptron, achieving the association between sequential response and model parameters. The errors in response data generated by calibrated parameters are quantified by PartsNet based on adaptive differentiation and Taylor expansion. Remarkable calibration capabilities are exhibited by PartsNet across six evaluation indicators, surpassing seven other deep learning approaches in the ablation test. The calibration accuracy of PartsNet reaches 91.29%, and MSE loss converges to 0.000934. The validation experiments and regression analysis confirmed the generalization capability of PartsNet in the calibration of wet sand. The improved sparse attention mechanism optimizes multi-head attention, resulting in a convergence speed of 21.25%. PartsNet contributes to modeling and simulating the precise mechanical properties of complex elastoplastic systems and offers valuable insights for diverse engineering applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Dam Engineering and Safety · Drilling and Well Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
Wuhan Second Institute of Ship Design and Research, Wuhan 430064, China
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Calibration and experimental verification of discrete element parameters for modelling feed pelleting10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2023.12.006 ↗
2. Carbon dioxide snow storms during the polar night on Mars10.1029/2001JE001758 ↗
3. Additive rheology of complex granular flows10.1038/s41467-020-15263-3 ↗
4. Effect of rock mass permeability and rock fracture leak-off coefficient on the pore water pressure distribution in a fractured slope10.1016/j.simpat.2020.102167 ↗
5. Fast and precise DEM parameter calibration for Cucurbita ficifolia seeds10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2023.11.004 ↗
6. Calibration and measurement of micrometre-scale pollen particles for discrete element method parameters based on the Johnson-Kendal-Roberts model10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2023.11.013 ↗
7. CLiu, Xu, Q., Shi, B., Deng, S., and Zhu, H. (2017). Mechanical properties and energy conversion of 3D close-packed lattice model for brittle rocks. Comput. Geosci., 103, 12–20.10.1016/j.cageo.2017.03.003 ↗
8. Method of soil-elastoplastic DEM parameter calibration based on recurrent neural network10.1016/j.powtec.2023.118222 ↗
9. Portable mid-infrared spectroscopy to predict parameters related to carbon storage in vineyard soils: Model calibrations under varying geopedological conditions10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2022.07.012 ↗
10. Coetzee, C.J., and Scheffler, O.C. (2022). Review: The Calibration of DEM Parameters for the Bulk Modelling of Cohesive Materials. Processes, 11.10.3390/pr11010005 ↗
11. Moncada, M., Betancourt, F., Rodríguez, C.G., and Toledo, P. (2022). Effect of Particle Shape on Parameter Calibration for a Discrete Element Model for Mining Applications. Minerals, 13.10.3390/min13010040 ↗
12. Yan, D., Yu, J., Wang, Y., Zhou, L., Tian, Y., and Zhang, N. (2022). Soil Particle Modeling and Parameter Calibration Based on Discrete Element Method. Agriculture, 12.10.3390/agriculture12091421 ↗
13. Calibration of discrete element parameters and experimental verification for modelling subsurface soils10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.10.012 ↗
14. Distilling Free-Form Natural Laws from Experimental Data10.1126/science.1165893 ↗
15. A general end-to-end diagnosis framework for manufacturing systems10.1093/nsr/nwz190 ↗
16. Hubin, A., and Storvik, G. (2019). Combining model and parameter uncertainty in Bayesian neural networks. arXiv.
17. Deep learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
18. Deep learning in neural networks: An overview10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 ↗
19. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 ↗
20. Calibration and interpretation of DEM parameters for simulations of cylindrical tablets with multi-sphere approach10.1016/j.powtec.2017.12.041 ↗
21. An approach to calibration of BPM bonding parameters for iron ore10.1016/j.powtec.2020.12.021 ↗
22. Calibration of parallel bond parameters in bonded particle models via physics-informed adaptive moment optimisation10.1016/j.powtec.2020.02.077 ↗
23. A study on model calibration using sensitivity based least squares method10.1007/s12206-022-0128-4 ↗
24. A calibration framework for discrete element model parameters using genetic algorithms10.1016/j.apt.2018.03.001 ↗
25. A calibration framework for the microparameters of the DEM model using the improved PSO algorithm10.1016/j.apt.2020.12.015 ↗
26. DEM Calibration Approach: Random Forest10.1088/1742-6596/1118/1/012009 ↗
27. Calibration and verification of DEM parameters for dynamic particle flow conditions using a backpropagation neural network10.1016/j.apt.2018.11.005 ↗
28. A calibration method for ore bonded particle model based on deep learning neural network10.1016/j.powtec.2023.118417 ↗
29. Optimization of DEM parameters using multi-objective reinforcement learning10.1016/j.powtec.2020.10.067 ↗
30. Bayesian Calibration of GPU–based DEM meso-mechanics Part II: Calibration of the granular meso-structure10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117666 ↗
31. Bruni, V., Cardinali, M.L., and Vitulano, D. (2022). A Short Review on Minimum Description Length: An Application to Dimension Reduction in PCA. Entropy, 24.10.3390/e24020269 ↗
32. PCA Dimensionality Reduction Method for Image Classification10.1007/s11063-021-10632-5 ↗
33. Kingma, D.P., and Welling, M. (2013). Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv.
34. Machine learning–enabled high-entropy alloy discovery10.1126/science.abo4940 ↗
35. Pinaya, W.H.L., Vieira, S., Garcia-Dias, R., and Mechelli, A. (2020). Autoencoders. Machine Learning, Elsevier.
36. Chung, J., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., and Bengio, Y. (2014). Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. arXiv.
37. Attention is all you need
38. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
39. EDEM contact model: Adhesive elasto-plastic model
40. Viscosity, granular-temperature, and stress calculations for shearing assemblies of inelastic, frictional disks10.1122/1.549893 ↗
41. Control method of seedbed compactness based on fragment soil compaction dynamic characteristics10.1016/j.still.2019.104551 ↗
42. Calibration of the discrete element method: Strategies for spherical and non-spherical particles10.1016/j.powtec.2020.01.076 ↗
43. Calibration of the discrete element method and the effect of particle shape10.1016/j.powtec.2016.04.003 ↗