journal article·2024-08-06Open access

Open-Set Recognition of Pansori Rhythm Patterns Based on Audio Segmentation

Jie You, Joonwhoan Lee

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 16

Abstract

Pansori, a traditional Korean form of musical storytelling, is characterized by performances involving a vocalist and a drummer. It is well-known for the singer’s expressive narrative (aniri) and delicate gesture with fan in hand. The classical Pansori repertoires mostly tell love, satire, and humor, as well as some social lessons. These performances, which can extend from three to five hours, necessitate that the vocalist adheres to precise rhythmic structures. The distinctive rhythms of Pansori are crucial for conveying both the narrative and musical expression effectively. This paper explores the challenge of open-set recognition, aiming to efficiently identify unknown Pansori rhythm patterns while applying the methodology to diverse acoustic datasets, such as sound events and genres. We propose a lightweight deep learning-based encoder–decoder segmentation model, which employs a 2-D log-Mel spectrogram as input for the encoder and produces a frame-based 1-D decision along the temporal axis. This segmentation approach, processing 2-D inputs to classify frame-wise rhythm patterns, proves effective in detecting unknown patterns within time-varying sound streams encountered in daily life. Throughout the training phase, both center and supervised contrastive losses, along with cross-entropy loss, are minimized. This strategy aimed to create a compact cluster structure within the feature space for known classes, thereby facilitating the recognition of unknown rhythm patterns by allocating ample space for their placement within the embedded feature space. Comprehensive experiments utilizing various datasets—including Pansori rhythm patterns (91.8%), synthetic datasets of instrument sounds (95.1%), music genres (76.9%), and sound datasets from DCASE challenges (73.0%)—demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed method to detect unknown events, as evidenced by the AUROC metrics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Music and Audio Processing · Music Technology and Sound Studies · Speech and Audio Processing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Information Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China

Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Pandeya, Y.R., Bhattarai, B., and Lee, J. (2022). Tracking the rhythm: Pansori rhythm segmentation and classification methods and datasets. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12199571 ↗
2. Recent advances in open set recognition: A survey10.1109/TPAMI.2020.2981604 ↗
3. Saito, K., Kim, D., and Saenko, K. (2021). OpenMatch: Open-set Consistency Regularization for Semi-supervised Learning with Outliers. arXiv.
4. Heras, J., Royo, D., and Ángel, M. (2024, June 28). A Good Closed-Set Classifier Is All You Need for the AIROGS Challenge. Available online: http://rumc-gcorg-p-public.s3.amazonaws.com/evaluation-supplementary/644/d79d3e55-505a-416a-b389-0a51170b1271/AIROGS.pdf.
5. Distance metric learning for large margin nearest neighbor classification
6. Schroff, F., Kalenichenko, D., and Philbin, J. (2015, January 7–12). Facenet: A unified embedding for face recognition and clustering. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2015, Boston, MA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298682 ↗
7. Yu, B., and Tao, D. (November, January 27). Deep metric learning with tuplet margin loss. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision 2019, Seoul, Republic of Korea.10.1109/ICCV.2019.00659 ↗
8. Liu, W., Wen, Y., Yu, Z., and Yang, M. (2016, January 19–24). Large-margin softmax loss for convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the ICML 2016, New York, NY, USA.
9. Oh Song, H., Xiang, Y., Jegelka, S., and Savarese, S. (2016, January 27–30). Deep metric learning via lifted structured feature embedding. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2016, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.434 ↗
10. Wang, X., Han, X., Huang, W., Dong, D., and Scott, M.R. (2019, January 15–20). Multi-similarity loss with general pair weighting for deep metric learning. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Long Beach, CA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2019.00516 ↗
11. Open set classification of sound event10.1038/s41598-023-50639-7 ↗
12. Fully convolutional open set segmentation10.1007/s10994-021-06027-1 ↗
13. Bendale, A., and Boult, T.E. (2016, January 27–30). Towards open set deep networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2016, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.173 ↗
14. Hendrycks, D., and Gimpel, K. (2016). A baseline for detecting misclassified and out-of-distribution examples in neural networks. arXiv.
15. Hendrycks, D., Basart, S., Mazeika, M., Mostajabi, M., Steinhardt, J., and Song, D. (2019). Scaling out-of-distribution detection for real-world settings. arXiv.
16. Chan, R., Rottmann, M., and Gottschalk, H. (2021, January 11–17). Entropy maximization and meta classification for out-of-distribution detection in semantic segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision 2021, Montreal, BC, Canada.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00508 ↗
17. Cen, J., Yun, P., Cai, J., Wang, M.Y., and Liu, M. (2021, January 11–17). Deep metric learning for open world semantic segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision 2021, Montreal, BC, Canada.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.01505 ↗
18. A survey on deep learning-based architectures for semantic segmentation on 2d images10.1080/08839514.2022.2032924 ↗
19. Long, J., Shelhamer, E., and Darrell, T. (2015, January 7–12). Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2015, Boston, MA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298965 ↗
20. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T. (2015, January 5–9). U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention 2015, Munich, Germany.10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 ↗
21. Segnet: A deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2644615 ↗
22. Chen, L.-C., Zhu, Y., Papandreou, G., Schroff, F., and Adam, H. (2018, January 8–14). Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) 2018, Munich, Germany.10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_49 ↗
23. Chen, L.-C., Papandreou, G., Schroff, F., and Adam, H. (2017). Rethinking atrous convolution for semantic image segmentation. arXiv.
24. Zheng, S., Lu, J., Zhao, H., Zhu, X., Luo, Z., Wang, Y., Fu, Y., Feng, J., Xiang, T., and Torr, P.H. (2021, January 20–25). Rethinking semantic segmentation from a sequence-to-sequence perspective with transformers. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2021, Nashville, TN, USA.10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00681 ↗
25. SegFormer: Simple and efficient design for semantic segmentation with transformers
26. Strudel, R., Garcia, R., Laptev, I., and Schmid, C. (2021, January 11–17). Segmenter: Transformer for semantic segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision 2021, Montreal, BC, Canada.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00717 ↗
27. Multiple scale music segmentation using rhythm, timbre, and harmony10.1155/2007/73205 ↗
28. Salamon, J., Nieto, O., and Bryan, N.J. (2021, January 7–12). Deep Embeddings and Section Fusion Improve Music Segmentation. Proceedings of the ISMIR 2021, Online.
29. Toward open set recognition10.1109/TPAMI.2012.256 ↗
30. Wen, Y., Zhang, K., Li, Z., and Qiao, Y. (2016, January 11–14). A discriminative feature learning approach for deep face recognition. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision 2016, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.10.1007/978-3-319-46478-7_31 ↗
31. Wu, C.-Y., Manmatha, R., Smola, A.J., and Krahenbuhl, P. (2017, January 22–29). Sampling matters in deep embedding learning. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision 2017, Venice, Italy.10.1109/ICCV.2017.309 ↗
32. Liu, W., Wen, Y., Yu, Z., Li, M., Raj, B., and Song, L. (2017, January 21–26). Sphereface: Deep hypersphere embedding for face recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2017, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.713 ↗
33. Zhao, X., Vemulapalli, R., Mansfield, P.A., Gong, B., Green, B., Shapira, L., and Wu, Y. (2021, January 11–17). Contrastive Learning for Label Efficient Semantic Segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision 2021, Montreal, BC, Canada.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.01045 ↗
34. Wang, W., Zhou, T., Yu, F., Dai, J., Konukoglu, E., and Van Gool, L. (2021, January 11–17). Exploring cross-image pixel contrast for semantic segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision 2021, Montreal, BC, Canada.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00721 ↗
35. Alonso, I., Sabater, A., Ferstl, D., Montesano, L., and Murillo, A.C. (2021, January 11–17). Semi-supervised semantic segmentation with pixel-level contrastive learning from a class-wise memory bank. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision 2021, Montreal, BC, Canada.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00811 ↗
36. Joseph, K., Khan, S., Khan, F.S., and Balasubramanian, V.N. (2021, January 20–25). Towards open world object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2021, Nashville, TN, USA.10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00577 ↗
37. Dhamija, A., Gunther, M., Ventura, J., and Boult, T. (2020, January 1–5). The overlooked elephant of object detection: Open set. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision 2020, Snowmass Village, CO, USA.10.1109/WACV45572.2020.9093355 ↗
38. Vaze, S., Han, K., Vedaldi, A., and Zisserman, A. (2021). Open-set recognition: A good closed-set classifier is all you need. arXiv.
39. Time–frequency feature representation using energy concentration: An overview of recent advances10.1016/j.dsp.2007.12.004 ↗
40. Deep high-resolution representation learning for visual recognition10.1109/TPAMI.2020.2983686 ↗
41. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016, January 27–30). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2016, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
42. Zagoruyko, S., and Komodakis, N. (2016). Wide residual networks. arXiv.10.5244/C.30.87 ↗
43. Supervised contrastive learning
44. Musical genre classification of audio signals10.1109/TSA.2002.800560 ↗
45. Meta-recognition: The theory and practice of recognition score analysis10.1109/TPAMI.2011.54 ↗
46. Lin, T.-Y., Dollár, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Hariharan, B., and Belongie, S. (2017, January 21–26). Feature pyramid networks for object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2017, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.106 ↗
47. Zhao, H., Shi, J., Qi, X., Wang, X., and Jia, J. (2017, January 21–26). Pyramid scene parsing network. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2017, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.660 ↗