Optimizing the Influence of Fly Ash as an Anti-Sagging Additive in Highly Deviated Geothermal Well Drilling Fluids Using Surface Response Method
Source abstract
Abstract
Weighting materials such as barite and ilmenite are crucial for controlling fluid density during deep or ultra-deep drilling operations. However, sagging poses significant challenges, especially in highly deviated high-pressure and high-temperature (HP/HT) wells. This leads to inadequate well control, wellbore instability, and variations in hydrostatic pressure in extended-reach wells. Given the challenges of experimental research, reliable prediction models are imperative for evaluating the interaction between the ratio of anti-sagging additives, temperature, and wellbore inclination on sag factor (SF). This research presents statistical-based empirical models for predicting the SF at various wellbore inclinations (0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 70°, 80°, and 90°) and assessing the influence of fly ash on the SF. The regression equations, developed using the Response Surface Methodology in Minitab 18 software, show high reliability, with R2 values approaching unity. Contour and surface response plots provide a clear understanding of the variable interactions. The analysis reveals that sagging is most severe at 60° to 65° inclination. At 400 °F and 60° inclination, adding 4 lb/bbl of fly ash reduces sagging in barite and ilmenite-densified fluid by 63.9% and 63.1%, respectively. Model validation shows high accuracy, with percentage errors below 3%. This study offers valuable insights for optimizing drilling fluid formulations in HP/HT well environments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Drilling and Well Engineering · Mineral Processing and Grinding · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Energy and Petroleum Engineering, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58203, USA
Funding
North Dakota Industrial Commission (NDIC)
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Bern, P.A., Zamora, M., Slater, K.S., and Hearn, P.J. (1996). The Influence of Drilling Variables on Barite Sag. All Days, SPE.10.2118/36670-MS ↗
2. Ofei, T.N., Lund, B., Saasen, A., Sangesland, S., Linga, H., Gyland, K.R., and Kawaji, M. (2020). Barite Sag Measurements. Day 2 Wed, March 04, 2020, SPE.10.2118/199567-MS ↗
3. A New Test Method to Characterize Setting/Sag Tendencies of Drilling Fluids in Extended Reach Drilling
4. Correlation of Ultralow-Shear-Rate Viscosity and Dynamic Barite Sag10.2118/70128-PA ↗
5. Barite–Micromax Mixture, an Enhanced Weighting Agent for the Elimination of Barite Sag in Invert Emulsion Drilling Fluids10.1007/s13202-020-00892-7 ↗
6. Vermiculite for Enhancement of Barite Stability in Water-Based Mud at Elevated Temperature10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117277 ↗
7. Fly Ash as an Additive for Controlling Sagging Tendency in Ilmenite Densified Water-Based Mud for a Highly Inclined High Temperature Well10.1016/j.geoen.2023.212232 ↗
8. Rheological Properties and Damage-Control Mechanism of Oil-Based Drilling Fluid with Different Types of Weighting Agents10.1098/rsos.180358 ↗
9. Investigating the Suitability of North Dakota Fly Ash as Fluid Loss Reducing Additive in Densified Water-Based Drilling Fluid10.1016/j.powtec.2023.118972 ↗
10. An Image-based method for evaluating changes in particle size and morphology distributions of aggregate materials after vibratory compaction test10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136483 ↗
11. The advantages of fly ash use in concrete structures
12. AlAbdullatif, Z., Al-Yami, A., Wagle, V., Bubshait, A., and Al-Safran, A. (2014). Development of New Kill Fluids with Minimum Sagging Problems for High Pressure Jilh Formation in Saudi Arabia. Day 3 Wed, November 12, 2014, SPE.10.2118/171683-MS ↗
13. Mohamed, A., Al-Afnan, S., Elkatatny, S., and Hussein, I. (2020). Prevention of Barite Sag in Water-Based Drilling Fluids by A Urea-Based Additive for Drilling Deep Formations. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12072719 ↗
14. Optimizing the content of nano-SiO2, nano-TiO2 and nano-CaCO3 in Portland cement paste by response surface methodology10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102073 ↗
15. Optimization of Penetration Rate in Rotary Percussive Drilling Using Two Techniques: Taguchi Analysis and Response Surface Methodology (RMS)10.1016/j.powtec.2018.08.030 ↗
16. Higher Energy Conversion Efficiency in Anaerobic Degradation of Bioplastic by Response Surface Methodology10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125840 ↗