journal article·2024-08-02Open access

Common-Reflection-Surface Stack with Global Simultaneous Multi-Parameter Velocity Analysis—A Fit for Shallow Seismics

Zeno Heilmann, Gian Piero Deidda

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 15

Abstract

In many regions, particularly coastal areas, population growth, overuse of water, and climate change have put quality and availability of water under threat. While accurate, predictive groundwater flow models are essential for effective water resource management, the precision of these models relies on the ability to determine the geometries of geological structures and hydrogeologic systems accurately. In complex geological settings or with deep aquifers, the drilling of observation wells becomes too costly and shallow seismic surveys become the method of choice. Common-Reflection-Surface stacking is being used by major oil companies for hydrocarbon exploration but can serve also as an advanced imaging method for near-surface seismic data. Its spatial stacking aperture covers a whole group of neighboring common midpoint gathers and, as such, a multitude of traces contribute to every single stacking process. Since the level of noise suppression is proportional to the number of contributing traces, Common-Reflection-Surface stacking generates a large increase in signal-to-noise ratio. In addition, the data-driven velocity analysis is a statistical process and is, as such, the more stable the more input traces it has. At the beginning, however, the spatial operator was only used for stacking, not for velocity analysis, since limiting computational demand was mandatory to obtain results within a reasonable time frame. Today’s computing facilities are thousands of times faster and even large efficiency gains do not justify the loss of effectiveness anymore that comes with a truncated velocity analysis. We show that this is particularly true for near-surface data with low signal-to-noise ratio and modest common midpoint fold. For the spatial velocity analysis, we present two options: (1) as reference, a global search of all three parameters of the Common-Reflection-Surface operator, and (2) as a quicker solution, a strategy that uses the two-parameter Common-Diffraction-Surface operator to obtain initial values for a local three-parameter optimization. For shallow P-wave data from a hydrogeological survey, we show that the computational cost of option (2) is one order of magnitude smaller than the cost of option (1), while the stack and corresponding normal-moveout velocities are very similar. Comparing the results of the spatial velocity analysis to those of preceding, computationally lighter, strategies, we find a significant improvement, both in stack section resolution and stacking parameter accuracy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Seismic Waves and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

CRS4 (Center for Advanced Studies, Research, and Development in Sardinia), Digital Technologies for Aerospace Department, loc. Piscina Manna, 09050 Pula, CA, Italy

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Architecture, University of Cagliari, via Marengo 2, 09123 Cagliari, CA, Italy

Funding

Autonomous Region of Sardinia · University of Cagliari

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Kravtsov, Y.A., and Orlov, Y.L. (1990). Geometrical Optics of Inhomogeneous Media, Springer Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-84031-9 ↗
2. Common reflection point horizontal data stacking techniques10.1190/1.1439118 ↗
3. Seismic velocities from surface measurements10.1190/1.1438126 ↗
4. Semblance and other coherency measures for multichannel data10.1190/1.1440186 ↗
6. Velocity estimation by the common-reflection-surface (CRS) method: Using ground-penetrating radar data10.1190/1.2106047 ↗
7. A theory of normal moveout10.1190/1.1443658 ↗
8. Schwarz, B. (2015). Moveout and Geometry. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Hamburg].
9. A competitive comparison of multi-parameter stacking approaches
10. A generalized view on normal moveout10.1190/geo2017-0159.1 ↗
11. Seismics and optics: Hyperbolae and curvatures10.1016/S0926-9851(99)00040-3 ↗
12. Common-reflection-surface stack—A real data example10.1016/S0926-9851(99)00042-7 ↗
13. Data stacking beyond CMP10.1190/1.2756859 ↗
14. Müller, T. (1999). The Common Reflection Surface Stack Method: Seismic Imaging without Explicit Knowledge of the Velocity Model. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Karlsruhe].
15. Common-reflection-surface stack: Image and attributes10.1190/1.1444927 ↗
16. Velocity model estimation with data-derived wavefront attributes10.1190/1.1649394 ↗
17. Mann, J., and Höcht, G. (2003). Pulse Stretch Effects in the Context of Data-Driven Imaging Methods. Proceedings of the 65th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.6.P007 ↗
18. Höcht, G. (2002). Traveltime Approximations for 2D and 3D Media and Kinematic Wavefield Attributes. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Karlsruhe].
19. Mann, J. (2002). Extensions and Applications of the Common-Reflection-Surface Stack Method. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Karlsruhe].10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.5.E023 ↗
20. Tomographic velocity model inversion using kinematic wave field attributes
21. Zhang, Y. (2003). Common-Reflection-Surface Stack and the Handling of top Surface Topography, Logos-Verl.
22. CRS-stack-based residual static correction10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00562.x ↗
23. Prestack seismic data enhancement with partial common-reflection-surface (CRS) stack10.1190/1.3106182 ↗
24. Common-reflection-point time migration10.1007/s11200-015-0392-1 ↗
25. 3D common-reflection-surface stack and kinematic wavefield attributes10.1190/1.1518438 ↗
26. Xie, Y. (2017). Determination and Application of 3-D Wavefront Attributes. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Hamburg].
27. A Simplex Method for Function Minimization10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 ↗
28. Event-consistent smoothing in generalized high-density velocity analysis
29. Heilmann, Z., Mann, J., Duveneck, E., and Hertweck, T. CRS-Stack-Based Seismic Reflection Imaging–A Real Data Example. Proceedings of the 66th EAGE Conference & Exhibition.
30. Klüver, T., and Mann, J. (2005). Event-consistent smoothing and automated picking in CRS-based seismic imaging. Proceedings of the 75th SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.10.1190/1.2148074 ↗
31. Common-reflection-surface imaging of shallow and ultrashallow reflectors10.1190/geo2011-0401.1 ↗
32. CRS-stack-based seismic imaging considering top-surface topography10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00565.x ↗
33. Garabito, G., Ao, J., Cruz, C.R., and Hubral, P. (2007). 2-D CRS Stack: One-step versus multi-step strategies. Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society & EXPOGEF, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.172.SBGF0270_07 ↗
34. Part II—CRS-beam PSDM: Kirchhoff-beam prestack depth migration using the 2D CRS stacking operator10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.07.004 ↗
35. Global optimisation by simulated annealing for common reflection surface stacking and its application to low-fold marine data in southwest Japan10.1071/EG12008 ↗
36. Barros, T., Ferrari, R., Krummenauer, R., Lopes, R., and Tygel, M. (2013). The Impact of the Parameter Estimation Strategy in the CRS Method. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society & EXPOGEF, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.10.1190/sbgf2013-314 ↗
37. Heilmann, Z., Müller, H.-P., Satta, G., and Deidda, G.P. (2014). Real-time or Full-precision CRS Imaging Using a Cloud Computing Portal—Multi-offset GPR and Shear-wave Reflection Data. Proceedings of Near Surface Geoscience 2014—20th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.10.3997/2214-4609.20142046 ↗
38. Differential evolution-based optimization procedure for automatic estimation of the common-reflection surface traveltime parameters10.1190/geo2015-0032.1 ↗
39. Common-reflection-surface stack improvement by differential evolution and conflicting dip processing
40. Santos, L.T., Schleicher, J., Costa, J.C., and Novais, A. Fast estimation of CRS parameters using local slopes. Proceedings of the SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts.
41. Hellman, K. Simultaneous estimation of CRS parameters with multi-dimensional local slopes. Proceedings of the 84th Annual SEG Meeting.
42. Common reflection surface stack; accounting for conflicting dip situations by considering all possible dips
43. Common reflection surface stack: A new parameter search strategy by global optimization
44. Computing true amplitude reflections in a laterally inhomogeneous earth10.1190/1.1441528 ↗
45. Parameter estimation from non-hyperbolic reflection traveltimes for large aperture common midpoint gathers10.3997/1873-0604.2014019 ↗
46. Geophysical investigations in the Flumendosa River Delta, Sardinia (Italy)–Seismic reflection imaging10.1190/1.2213247 ↗
47. Real-time imaging and data analysis for shallow seismic data using a cloud-computing portal10.3997/1873-0604.2013018 ↗