Experimental Bond Characterisation and Inverse Numerical Stress-Slip Law Identification for Adhesive Anchor Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
In order to determine the adhesive anchors’ capacity under tensile loading, two test methods (confined and unconfined) are suggested in the guideline. Improvements for one of the two configurations are proposed and tested in this paper. The alternative setup currently being evaluated is a modified version of the one proposed by the RILEM technical recommendation, which is used to determine the bond properties of reinforced concrete elements. Finding a better and more consistent definition of the bonded length, removing the concrete surface contribution from the determined bond resistance, and testing the stability improvements were considered during the proposed setup development. In order to describe the adhesive anchor system’s behaviour, a stress-slip relation (law), which relates the local axial bond stress to the local axial slippage, can be used. Analytical and numerical procedures have been proposed in the literature in order to determine such a law. Here, an inverse calibration method based on Sequentially Linear Analysis (SLA) is applied in order to identify the stress-slip law of pull-out tests.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Christian Doppler Laboratory, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Peter-Jordanstr. 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria
Department of Mechanics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, 16000 Prague, Czech Republic
Magnel-Vandepitte Laboratory, Ghent University, Tech Lane Ghent Science Park, Campus A, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 60, 9052 Ghent, Belgium
Funding
Austrian Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth · National Foundation for Research, Technology and Development · GAČR
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Eligehausen, R., Mallée, R., and Silva, J.F. (2006). Anchorage in Concrete Construction, John Wiley & Sons.
2. Behavior and design of adhesive bonded anchors
3. (2018). Bonded Fasteners for Use in Concrete (Standard No. EAD 330499-01-0601).
4. Marcon, M., Vorel, J., Ninčević, K., and Wan-Wendner, R. (2017). Modeling adhesive anchors in a discrete element framework. Materials, 10.10.3390/ma10080917 ↗
5. Behavior of chemically bonded anchors10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:9(2744) ↗
6. Behavior and Design of Single Adhesive Anchors under Tensile Load in Uncracked Concrete
7. Cook, R.A., Douglas, E.P., Davis, T.M., and Liu, C. (2013). Long-Term Performance of Epoxy Adhesive Anchor Systems, The National Academies Press. Number 04-37.10.17226/22470 ↗
8. Unterweger, R., and Bergmeister, K. (1998, January 28–30). Investigations of Concrete Boreholes for Bonded Anchors. Proceedings of the 2nd International PhD Symposium in Civil Engineering, Budapest, Hungary.
9. Innovative drilling methods and the influence on condition and geometry of drill holes10.1002/bate.201700014 ↗
10. Marcon, M., Ninčević, K., Boumakis, I., Czernuschka, L.M., and Wan-Wendner, R. (2018). Aggregate Effect on the Concrete Cone Capacity of an Undercut Anchor under Quasi-Static Tensile Load. Materials, 11.10.3390/ma11050711 ↗
11. RILEM (1994). RILEM Technical Recommendations for the Testing and Use of Construction Materials, Taylor & Francis Group.10.1201/9781482271362 ↗
12. Direct determination of cohesive stress transfer during debonding of FRP from concrete10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.05.024 ↗
13. An indirect method to calibrate the interfacial cohesive material law for FRCM-concrete joints10.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.038 ↗
14. (2010). Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures—Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings (Standard No. BS EN 1992-1-1:2004).
15. Direct testing of gradual postpeak softening of fracture specimens of fiber composites stabilized by enhanced grip stiffness and mass10.1115/1.4034312 ↗
16. Bond between deformed reinforcement and normal and high-strength concrete with and without fibers10.1617/s11527-009-9551-6 ↗
17. Time-dependent changes of mechanical properties of polymer-based composite materials for adhesive anchor systems10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.076 ↗
18. Long-term creep behavior of resin-based polymers in the construction industry
19. Shear test equipment for testing various polymeric materials by using minor adapted standardized multipurpose specimens10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.01.024 ↗
20. fib (2013). fib Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010, International Federation for Structural Concrete.10.1002/9783433604090 ↗
21. Vorel, J., Marcon, M., Pelessone, D., Cusatis, G., and Wendner, R. (June, January 28). PID controller in explicit solver. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures, FraMCoS-9, Berkeley, CA, USA.
22. Bažant, Z.P., and Cedolin, L. (1991). Stability of Structures: Elastic, Inelastic, Fracture and Damage Theories, World Scientific.
23. Inverse analysis of traction-separation relationship based on sequentially linear approach10.1016/j.compstruc.2018.10.005 ↗
24. Investigation of fracture based on sequentially linear analysis10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.08.008 ↗
25. Rots, J., and Invernizzi, S. (2004). Saw-tooth softening/stiffening model. Fract. Mech. Concr. Struct. USA, 375–382.
26. Regularized sequentially linear saw-tooth softening model10.1002/nag.371 ↗
27. Design of object oriented finite element code10.1016/S0965-9978(01)00027-8 ↗