Review of Intelligent Methods and Their Potential Use towards a Smart Grid Negotiation Framework
Source abstract
Abstract
The integration of Distributed Energy Resources utilizing Renewable Energy Sources, Energy Storage Systems, and Information and Communication Technologies is transforming traditional energy systems into adaptable, flexible, and sustainable systems, with the Smart Grid concept playing a pivotal role. This paper surveys intelligent techniques and methods applied in various markets and applications, particularly focusing on their potential adaptation for negotiation processes in Smart Grid contexts. The negotiation mechanisms, crucial for prosumers who engage in real-time transactions, are analyzed with a focus on fuzzy logic tools, specifically q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Sets. These tools are evaluated for their capability to handle negotiation tasks and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making problems. The paper proposes a negotiation schema for healthcare buildings, especially hospitals, given their significant environmental impact, providing insight for future research.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Smart Grid Energy Management · Smart Grid Security and Resilience · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of West Attica, Egaleo Park Campus, 12243 Athens, Greece
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Electricity, the decisive factor in modern civilization
2. Georgilakis, P. (2023). Economic and Reliable Operation of Modern Electric Power Systems, Kallipos Open Academic Publications. Undergraduate Textbook.
3. Biggar, D.R., and Hesamzadeh, M.R. (2014). The Economics of Electricity Markets, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.10.1002/9781118775745 ↗
4. Estimating Smart Grid’s Carbon Emission Reduction Potential in China’s Manufacturing Industry Based on Decomposition Analysis10.3389/fenrg.2021.681244 ↗
5. Prosumers as active market participants: A systematic review of evolution of opportunities, models and challenges
6. Kotilainen, K., and Saari, U.A. (2018). Policy Influence on Consumers’ Evolution into Prosumers—Empirical Findings from an Exploratory Survey in Europe. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10010186 ↗
7. Falvo, M.C., Martirano, L., Sbordone, D., and Bocci, E. (2013, January 5–8). Technologies for Smart Grids: A brief review. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering, Wroclaw, Poland.10.1109/EEEIC.2013.6549544 ↗
8. Demand side management: Benefits and challenges10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.030 ↗
9. Bertoli, E., Rozite, V., Reidenbach, B., Vautrin, A., Oh, S., and Suire, M. (2024, February 06). Demand Response-IEA. IEA-International Energy Agency. Available online: https://www.iea.org/energy-system/energy-efficiency-and-demand/demand-response.
10. A comprehensive review on demand side management and market design for renewable energy support and integration10.1016/j.egyr.2023.09.049 ↗
11. Coordinating Flexible Demand Response and Renewable Uncertainties for Scheduling of Community Integrated Energy Systems with an Electric Vehicle Charging Station: A Bi-level Approach10.1109/TSTE.2021.3090463 ↗
12. Demand response and smart grids-A survey
13. Reddy, P.P., and Veloso, M.M. (2013, January 14–18). Negotiated Learning for Smart Grid Agents: Entity Selection Based on Dynamic Partially Observable Features. Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 1313, Bellevue, WA, USA.10.1609/aaai.v27i1.8481 ↗
14. Ruttkay, Z. (1994, January 26–29). Fuzzy Constraint Satisfaction. Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE 3rd International Fuzzy Systems Conference, Orlando, FL, USA.
15. A genetic agent-based negotiation system10.1016/S1389-1286(01)00215-8 ↗
16. Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations10.1016/S0004-3702(02)00290-4 ↗
17. Cheng, C.-B., Chan, C.-C.H., and Lin, C.-C. (2005, January 4–7). Buyer-Supplier Negotiation by Fuzzy Logic Based Agents. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information Technology and Applications (ICITA’05), Sydney, Australia.
18. Intelligent agents for e-marketplace: Negotiation with issue trade-offs by fuzzy inference systems10.1016/j.dss.2005.02.009 ↗
19. Wang, Z., and Wang, L. (2012, January 7–10). Negotiation agent with adaptive attitude bidding strategy for facilitating energy exchanges between smart building and utility grid. Proceedings of the PES T&D 2012, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1109/TDC.2012.6281688 ↗
20. A single issue negotiation model for agents bargaining in dynamic electronic markets10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.020 ↗
21. Adaptive Negotiation Agent for Facilitating Bi-Directional Energy Trading Between Smart Building and Utility Grid10.1109/TSG.2013.2237794 ↗
22. A new fuzzy negotiation protocol for grid resource allocation10.1016/j.jnca.2012.12.030 ↗
23. Sellers in e-marketplaces: A Fuzzy Logic based decision support system10.1016/j.ins.2014.03.052 ↗
24. Development and evaluation of the many-to-many supplier negotiation strategy10.1016/j.cie.2014.01.009 ↗
25. Development and evaluation of the interactive bidding strategies for a demander and its suppliers in supplier selection auction market10.1080/00207540701275303 ↗
26. Guo, P., and Pedrycz, W. (2013). Supporting Ill-Structured Negotiation Problems. Human-Centric Decision-Making Models for Social Sciences, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-39307-5 ↗
27. An adaptive fuzzy logic system for automated negotiations10.1016/j.fss.2014.09.016 ↗
28. Application of fuzzy TOPSIS to scoring the negotiation offers in ill-structured negotiation problems10.1016/j.ejor.2014.10.050 ↗
29. A multi-demand negotiation model based on fuzzy rules elicited via psychological experiments10.1016/j.asoc.2017.07.013 ↗
30. An Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy constraint based method for offer evaluation and trade-off making in automated negotiation10.1016/j.knosys.2017.10.020 ↗
31. Automated negotiation for ensuring composite service requirements in cloud computing10.1016/j.sysarc.2019.08.005 ↗
32. Real-time opponent learning in automated negotiation using recursive Bayesian filtering10.1016/j.eswa.2019.03.025 ↗
33. Etukudor, C., Couraud, B., Robu, V., Früh, W.-G., Flynn, D., and Okereke, C. (2020). Automated Negotiation for Peer-to-Peer Electricity Trading in Local Energy Markets. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13040920 ↗
34. Transactive Demand Response Operation at the Grid Edge using the IEEE 2030.5 Standard10.1016/j.eng.2020.06.005 ↗
35. Peer-to-peer energy trades based on multi-objective optimization10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107017 ↗
36. Roszkowska, E. (2021, January 24–26). The Intuitionistic Fuzzy Framework for Evaluation and Rank Ordering the Negotiation Offers. Proceedings of the INFUS 2021 Conference, Istanbul, Turkey.10.1007/978-3-030-85577-2_7 ↗
37. Akram, M., Ullah, K., Ćirović, G., and Pamucar, D. (2023). Algorithm for Energy Resource Selection Using Priority Degree-Based Aggregation Operators with Generalized Orthopair Fuzzy Information and Aczel–Alsina Aggregation Operators. Energies, 16.10.3390/en16062816 ↗
38. A review of PSO-based algorithm application in Demand Side Management: Challenges & Opportunities10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3278261 ↗
39. Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model10.2307/1912531 ↗
40. Relaxed-criteria negotiation for grid resource allocation
41. Market-based grid resource allocation using new negotiation model10.1016/j.jnca.2012.02.008 ↗
42. Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple-attribute decision making10.1002/int.21927 ↗
43. Toward a generalized theory of uncertainty (GTU)––An outline10.1016/j.ins.2005.01.017 ↗
44. Fuzzy sets10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X ↗
45. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3 ↗
46. Pythagorean Membership Grades, Complex Numbers, and Decision Making10.1002/int.21584 ↗
47. Generalized Orthopair Fuzzy Sets10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2604005 ↗
48. Guidelines for efficient and sustainable energy management in hospital buildings
49. Bawaneh, K., Nezami, F., Rasheduzzaman, M., and Deken, B. (2019). Energy Consumption Analysis and Characterization of Healthcare Facilities in the United States. Energies, 12.10.3390/en12193775 ↗