Signal Reconstruction of Arbitrarily Lack of Frequency Bands from Seismic Wavefields Based on Deep Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Due to the limitations of seismic exploration instruments and the impact of the high frequencies absorption by the earth layers during subsurface propagation of seismic waves, recorded seismic data usually lack high and low frequency information that is needed to accurately image geological structures. Traditional methods face challenges such as limitations of model assumptions and poor adaptability to complex geological conditions. Therefore, this paper proposes a deep learning method that introduces the attention mechanism and Bi-directional gated recurrent unit (BiGRU) into the Transformer neural network. This approach can simultaneously capture both global and local characteristics of time series data, establish mappings between different frequency bands, and achieve information compensation and frequency extension. The results show that the BiGRU-Extended Transformer network is capable of compensating and extending the synthetic seismic data sets with the limited frequency band. It has certain generalization capabilities and stability and can effectively handle various problems in the data reconstruction process, which is better than traditional methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Seismic Waves and Analysis · Seismology and Earthquake Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Geoexploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Xi Min Zhu Street No. 938, Changchun 130026, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang, P. (2018). The Study on Full Waveform Inversion Based on Low-Frequency Seismic Wavefield Reconstruction. [Ph.D. Thesis, Jilin University].
2. Fang, S. (2022). Bandwidth Extension Method of Seismic Data Based on Full-band Extension Filter. [Master’s Thesis, China University of Petroleum].
3. Joint FWI of Active Source Data and Passive Virtual Source Data Recon-structed Using an Improved Multidimensional Deconvolution10.1109/TGRS.2023.3257390 ↗
4. Chen, Z. (2022). Seismic Data Frequency Extension Based on Deep Learning. [Master’s Thesis, China University of Petroleum].
5. Application of seismic frequency extension technology in dynamic analysis of thin layer reservoir development
6. Compressed Sensing and Sparse Inversion Based Low-Frequency Information Compen-sation of Seismic Data
7. A method for simultaneous recovery of low-frequency amplitude and phase from conventional detector data based on high- and low-frequency joint measurement
8. Feature analysis and compensation of seismic low-frequency based on compressed sensing and broad-band YU-type low-passing shaping filter
9. Research on protection and extension for seismic low frequencies
10. Frequency extension and robust full-waveform inversion based on nth power operation10.1007/s11600-020-00465-6 ↗
11. Denoising the Optical Fiber Seismic Data by Using Convolutional Adversarial Network Based on Loss Balance10.1109/TGRS.2020.3036065 ↗
12. Seismic Shot Gather Denoising by Using a Supervised-Deep-Learning Method with Weak Dependence on Real Noise Data: A Solution to the Lack of Real Noise Data10.1007/s10712-022-09702-7 ↗
13. Seismic velocity inversion transformer10.1190/geo2022-0283.1 ↗
14. Zhang, H., Wang, W., Wang, X., Chen, W., Zhou, Y., Wang, C., and Zhao, Z. (2020, January 15–20). An implementation of the seismic resolution en-hancing network based on GAN. Proceedings of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Exposition and Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, USA.10.1190/segam2019-3216229.1 ↗
15. Extrapolated full-waveform inversion with deep learning10.1190/geo2019-0195.1 ↗
16. Sun, H., and Demanet, L. (2020, January 15–20). Extrapolated full waveform inversion with convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Exposition and Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, USA.10.1190/segam2019-3197987.1 ↗
17. Sun, H., and Demanet, L. (2018, January 14–19). Low frequency extrapolation with deep learning. Proceedings of the 2018 SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, Anaheim, CA, USA.10.1190/segam2018-2997928.1 ↗
18. Data-driven low-frequency signal recovery using deep-learning predictions in full-waveform inversion10.1190/geo2020-0159.1 ↗
19. Deep learning spectral enhancement considering features of seismic field data10.1190/geo2020-0017.1 ↗
20. Machine-learning-based data recovery and its contribution to seismic acquisition: Simulta-neous application of deblending, trace reconstruction, and low-frequency extrapolation10.1190/geo2020-0303.1 ↗
21. Progressive transfer learning for low-frequency data prediction in full-waveform inver-sion10.1190/geo2020-0598.1 ↗
22. Efficient Progressive Transfer Learning for Full-Waveform Inversion with Extrapolated Low-Frequency Reflection Seismic Data10.1109/TGRS.2021.3129810 ↗
23. Deep Learning-Based Low-Frequency Extrapolation and Impedance Inversion of Seismic Data
24. Ni, J. (2023). Prediction of High and Low Frequency Earthquakes Based on Neural Network. [Master’s Thesis, Northeast Petroleum Uni-versity].
25. Low frequency continuation of seismic data based on physically constrained U-Net network
26. Yin, Y. (2023). The Study of Joint Processing Method of Seismic Data from Multiple Sources Based on Convolutional Neural Net-Works. [Ph.D. Thesis, Jilin University].
27. Wang, T. (2017). Study on the Elimination and Migration of Surface Related Multiple by Sparse-Constrain Inversion. [Ph.D. Thesis, Jilin University].
28. Attention Is All You Need
29. Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., and Gelly, S. (2021). An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale. arXiv.
30. Structural dynamic response reconstruction and virtual sensing using a sequence to se-quence modeling with attention mechanism10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103895 ↗
31. Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., and Guo, B. (2021, January 11–17). Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer us-ing Shifted Windows. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Montreal, BC, Canada.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00986 ↗
32. Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Networks10.1109/78.650093 ↗
33. Cho, K., Van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., and Bengio, Y. (2014). Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation. arXiv.10.3115/v1/D14-1179 ↗