Active Ankle–Foot Orthosis Design and Computer Simulation with Multi-Objective Parameter Optimization
Source abstract
Abstract
There are many current active orthosis designs to assist with disabilities related to foot-drop, with most of them intervening during the whole gait cycle. We propose that, for the treatment of foot-drop, it is possible to design an ankle–foot device that will assist a walking user only during the dorsiflexion stages of the gait, avoiding interference with other stages, by using a single actuator with a simple transmission and a suspension block. This design can be improved by the use of multi-objective optimization to obtain a static set of parameters that are applicable to varying initial conditions. We present a computer simulation study of an active ankle–foot orthosis design, based on the interaction of a cam and lever with a suspension block, with the objective of assisting only with dorsiflexion during the gait cycle, leaving the rest of the movements unimpeded while reducing the complexity and weight of the device. This design is validated using a full simulation environment that includes the movements of the lower leg and foot, as they interact with our device and a ground element. As part of the design and validation, we found sets of mechanical and control parameters that provoke adequate output behavior of the orthosis to help the wearer perform a moderate-speed, normal gait. To optimize the design, we proposed three objectives to warrant ankle angle accuracy, minimal oscillations, and low energy consumption. A set of solutions was obtained with multi-objective optimization algorithms NSGA-II and RVEA to tune the parameters of the active orthosis. The solutions set from RVEA resulted in lower mean and standard deviation values for the oscillations and energy objectives in comparison to the solutions from NSGA-II, while for the MSE objective, NSGA-II obtained lower mean and standard deviation; for the energy consumption objective, the mean score using RVEA is 17% less than with NSGA-II. The orthosis is shown to be robust to differences in initial ankle angles. We observed that it is possible to obtain a broad set of solutions with a good performance during the gait cycle in controlled spaces and that in this application, the RVEA algorithm results in a better option for optimization to balance the objectives.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics · Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes · Muscle activation and electromyography studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electronics Engineering, University of Guanajuato, Carretera Salamanca—Valle de Santiago km 3.5 + 1.8, Comunidad de Palo Blanco, Salamanca 36787, Mexico
Department of Medicine and Nutrition, University of Guanajuato, Blvd. Milenio 1001, Predio San Carlos, León de los Aldama 37670, Mexico
Funding
Innovation, Science and Entrepreneurship Institute for Competitiveness of Guanajuato State (IDEA GTO) · Mexican Council for Humanities, Science and Technology (CONAHCYT)
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Foot drop: Where, why and what to do?10.1136/jnnp.2008.149393 ↗
2. Nori, S.L., and Stretanski, M.F. (2022). StatPearls, StatPearls Publishing.
3. A pneumatic power harvesting ankle-foot orthosis to prevent foot-drop10.1186/1743-0003-6-19 ↗
4. Trends and Technologies in Rehabilitation of Foot Drop: A Systematic Review10.1080/17434440.2021.1857729 ↗
5. Functional Electrical Stimulation on Improving Foot Drop Gait in Poststroke Rehabilitation: A Review of its Technology and Clinical Efficacy10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2013007621 ↗
6. Functional electrical stimulation versus ankle foot orthoses for foot-drop: A meta-analysis of orthotic effects10.2340/16501977-2136 ↗
7. A survey on soft lower limb cable-driven wearable robots without rigid links and joints10.1016/j.robot.2021.103846 ↗
8. A Soft Wearable Robotic Ankle-Foot-Orthosis for Post-Stroke Patients10.1109/LRA.2019.2908491 ↗
9. Randomized controlled trial of robot-assisted gait training with dorsiflexion assistance on chronic stroke patients wearing ankle-foot-orthosis10.1186/s12984-018-0394-7 ↗
10. Modeling of a biped robot for investigating foot drop using MATLAB/Simulink10.1016/j.simpat.2019.101972 ↗
11. Bermejo-García, J., Jorge, D.R., Romero-Sánchez, F., and Alonso, F.J. (2023). Dynamic optimization of anchor points positions in a cable driven exosuit: A computer simulation approach. Mech. Based Des. Struct. Mach.10.1080/15397734.2023.2248247 ↗
12. Adaptive Control of a Variable-Impedance Ankle-Foot Orthosis to Assist Drop-Foot Gait10.1109/TNSRE.2003.823266 ↗
13. Technologies for Powered Ankle-Foot Orthotic Systems: Possibilities and Challenges10.1109/TMECH.2011.2174799 ↗
14. Arnez-Paniagua, V., Rifaï, H., Amirat, Y., and Mohammed, S. (2017, January 17–20). Adaptive control of an actuated-ankle-foot-orthosis. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, London, UK.10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009474 ↗
15. Todorov, E., Erez, T., and Tassa, Y. (2012, January 7–12). MuJoCo: A physics engine for model-based control. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vilamoura-Algarve, Portugal.10.1109/IROS.2012.6386109 ↗
16. A multimodal dataset of human gait at different walking speeds established on injury-free adult participants10.1038/s41597-019-0124-4 ↗
17. Lara-Velazquez, C.A., Ramirez-Paredes, J.P., Martinez-Ramirez, I., Nunez-Altamirano, D.A., Gonzalez-Sandoval, B.V., Torres-Del-Carmen, F., Correa-Tome, F.E., Perez-Ramirez, L.E., and Velazquez-Bustamante, A.E. (2022, January 5–9). Design and Simulation of an Active Ankle-Foot Orthosis with Parameter Optimization. Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Mechatronics, Electronics and Automotive Engineering (ICMEAE), Cuernavaca, Mexico.10.1109/ICMEAE58636.2022.00009 ↗
18. pymoo: Multi-Objective Optimization in Python10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990567 ↗
19. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II10.1109/4235.996017 ↗
20. A Reference Vector Guided Evolutionary Algorithm for Many-Objective Optimization10.1109/TEVC.2016.2519378 ↗
21. Modeling and Simulation of a Lower Extremity Powered Exoskeleton10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2854605 ↗
22. Bianco, N.A., Franks, P.W., Hicks, J.L., and Delp, S.L. (2022). Coupled Exoskeleton Assistance Simplifies Control and Maintains Metabolic Benefits: A Simulation Study. PLoS ONE, 17.10.1371/journal.pone.0261318 ↗
23. Bianco, N.A., Collins, S.H., Liu, K., and Delp, S.L. (2023). Simulating the Effect of Ankle Plantarflexion and Inversion-Eversion Exoskeleton Torques on Center of Mass Kinematics during Walking. PLoS Comput. Biol., 19.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010712 ↗
24. Nguyen, V.Q., Umberger, B.R., and Sup, F.C. (2019, January 24–28). Predictive Simulation of Human Walking Augmented by a Powered Ankle Exoskeleton. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Toronto, ON, Canada.10.1109/ICORR.2019.8779368 ↗