journal article·2024-03-12Open access

Critical Ergonomics and (Dis)Comfort Factors While Performing Tasks with Hand Tools on a Ladder: A Pilot Study

Rosaria Califano, Antonio Auricchio, Mario Carbone, Lucio Dessì, Valentino Frasci, Angelo Landi, Alessandro Naddeo

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 6

Abstract

Falls at height are among the major causes of fatal accidents at work, especially in the construction sector. Maintaining balance while performing a tool with both hands generates physical efforts and mental loading that needs to be managed for workers’ safety and health. The purpose of the study is to compare perceived (dis)comfort (overall and localized), the ergonomic risk, and the perceived effort through the acquired postures that subjects assumed during the execution of simple and common tasks both on a ladder and on the ground. 26 subjects were asked to perform four tasks in both conditions: top screwing, frontal screwing, object picking from the bottom forward, and object picking from the bottom sideways. Subjective and objective data were gathered for assessing subjective experience (discomfort and effort, perceived) and ergonomic risk. Results highlighted few ergonomic risk differences among “on ladder” and “on ground” tasks, while subjective data reveal significant differences in different scenarios. Furthermore, the knees and neck areas are the most critical ones.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders · Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation · Ergonomics and Human Factors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Ergonomic design interventions—A case study involving portable ladders10.1080/00140130600576454 ↗
2. Safety on ladders: An ergonomic design approach10.1016/0003-6870(76)90062-4 ↗
3. An ergonomic analysis of the ladder climbing activity10.1016/0169-8141(90)90047-6 ↗
4. Body Movements in Climbing a Ladder10.1080/00140137708931602 ↗
5. Occupational hazards in window cleaning10.1136/bmj.3.5982.530 ↗
6. Young, S.L., and Wogalter, M.S. (August, January 29). On improving set-up angle accuracy for extension ladders. Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and the 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society: Ergonomics for the New Millennium, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1177/154193120004402503 ↗
7. National Safety Council Injury (2013). National Safety Council Injury Facts 2. Injury Fact, National Safety Council.
8. Leading Causes of Unintentional and Intentional Injury Mortality: United States, 2000–200910.2105/AJPH.2012.300960 ↗
9. Work-related falls from ladders—A follow-back study of US emergency department cases10.5271/sjweh.3174 ↗
10. A comparison of fatal occupational injury event characteristics from the Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries and the Vital Statistics Mortality System10.1016/j.jsr.2013.05.004 ↗
11. Effects of foot placement, hand positioning, age and climbing biodynamics on ladder slip outcomes10.1080/00140139.2014.943681 ↗
12. Effects of Ladder Climbing Patterns on Fall Severity10.1177/1541931213601717 ↗
13. Factors affecting fall severity from a ladder: Impact of climbing direction, gloves, gender and adaptation10.1016/j.apergo.2016.11.011 ↗
14. (2023, December 20). ANSI ASC A14.5-2017: Ladders—Portable Reinforced Plastic—Safety Requirements. Available online: www.americanladderinstitute.org.
15. Extension-ladder safety: Solutions and knowledge gaps10.1016/j.ergon.2008.01.011 ↗
16. Is renovation riskier than new construction? An observational comparison of risk factors for stepladder-related falls10.1002/ajim.20956 ↗
17. Hand-handhold coupling: Effect of handle shape, orientation, and friction on breakaway strength10.1177/0018720809355969 ↗
18. Ladder rung vs. siderail hand grip strategies
19. Effects of aerial ladder rung spacing on firefighter climbing biomechanics10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102911 ↗
20. Knox, E.H., and Van Bree, M.P. (2010, January 18–20). Field Studies and Labeling Research on the Angle of Inclination of Non-Self Supporting Ladders. Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Fall Prevention and Protection, Morgantown, WV, USA.
21. Factors Affecting Extension Ladder Angular Positioning10.1177/0018720812445805 ↗
22. The effect of instructions on potential slide-out failures during portable extension ladder angular positioning10.1016/j.aap.2014.01.025 ↗
23. Research to improve extension ladder angular positioning10.1016/j.apergo.2012.10.017 ↗
24. Workload of window cleaners using ladders differing in rung separation10.1016/j.apergo.2005.01.013 ↗
25. Comparison of Exposure to Repetitive Upper Arm Motions and Non-neutral Upper Arm Postures between Apple Harvesting with Ladders and Mobile Platforms10.1177/1541931214581330 ↗
26. Comparing Upper Arm and Back Postural Exposures between Apple Harvesting with Ladders and Mobile Platform10.1177/1541931215591199 ↗
27. A feasibility study comparing objective and subjective field-based physical exposure measurements during apple harvesting with ladders and mobile platforms10.1080/1059924X.2019.1593273 ↗
28. Ergonomic and efficiency analysis of conventional apple harvest process
29. The Role of a New Harvest Platform in Alleviation of Apple Workers’ Occupational Injuries During Harvest10.13031/jash.13103 ↗
30. RULA: A survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders10.1016/0003-6870(93)90080-S ↗
31. Grinten, M.P. (1992). Development of a pratical method for measuring body part discomfort. Advances in Industrial Egonomics and Safety IV, Taylor and Francis.
32. Likert Scale: Explored and Explained10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975 ↗
33. A Technique for Assessing Postural Discomfort10.1080/00140137608931530 ↗
34. Comfort and pressure distribution in a human contour shaped aircraft seat (developed with 3D scans of the human body)
35. The effect of human-mattress interface’s temperature on perceived thermal comfort10.1016/j.apergo.2016.07.012 ↗
36. Proposal of a new quantitative method for postural comfort evaluation10.1016/j.ergon.2015.03.008 ↗
37. Naddeo, A., Cappetti, N., Vallone, M., and Califano, R. (2014, January 19–23). New trend line of research about comfort evaluation: Proposal of a framework for weighing and evaluating contributes coming from cognitive, postural and physiologic comfort perceptions. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics AHFE 2014, Kraków, Poland.
38. Postural comfort evaluation: Experimental identification of Range of Rest Posture for human articular joints10.1007/s12008-013-0186-z ↗
39. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion10.1249/00005768-198205000-00012 ↗
40. Postural Comfort Inside a Car: Development of an Innovative Model to Evaluate the Discomfort Level10.4271/2009-01-1163 ↗
41. Kotz, S., and Johnson, N.L. (1992). Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Breakthroughs in Statistics: Methodology and Distribution, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9 ↗
42. Eminoğlu, M., Ozguven, M., Beyaz, A., and Acar, A. (2009, January 27–29). Determining Postural Discomfort at Working with Power Tiller. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Energy Efficiency & Agricultural Engineering, Ruse, Bulgaria.