Bayesian Linguistic Conditional System as an Attention Mechanism in a Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Fuzzy Inference System behavior can be described qualitatively using a natural language, which is known as the expert-driven approach to handling non-statistical uncertainty. Generally, practical applications involve conceptualizing the problem by integrating linguistic uncertainty and using data by integrating stochastic uncertainty. The proposed probabilistic fuzzy system uses the Gaussian Density Function (GDF) to assign a probability to input variables integrating stochastic uncertainty. In addition, a linguistic interpretation is used to project various categories of the GDF integrating linguistic uncertainty. Likewise, one of the relevant aspects of the proposal is to weigh each input variable according to the heuristic interpretation that determines the probability assigned to each of them a priori. Therefore, the main contribution of the research focuses on using the Bayesian Linguistic Conditional System (BLCS) as a mechanism of attention to relate the categories of the different input variables and find their posterior-weighted probability at a normalization stage. Finally, the knowledge base is established through linguistic rules, and the system’s output is a Bayesian classifier multiplying its normalized posterior conditional probabilities. The highest probability value of the knowledge base is identified, and the Risk Priority Number Weighted (RPNW) is determined using their respective posterior-normalized probabilities for each input variable. The results are expressed on a simple and precise scale from 1 to 10. They are compared with the Risk Priority Number (RPN), which results in a Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA). They show similar behaviors for multiple combinations in the evaluations while highlighting different scales.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Departamento de Estudios Multidisciplinarios, División de Ingenierías, Campus Irapuato-Salamanca, Universidad de Guanajuato, Yuriria 38944, Guanajuato, Mexico
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Failure mode and effect analysis in asset maintenance: A multiple case study in the process industry10.1080/00207543.2012.674648 ↗
2. Nowlan, F.S., and Heap, H.F. (1992). Reliability-Centered Maintenance, Industrial Press Inc.
3. Multiple perspectives on analyzing risk factors in FMEA10.1016/j.compind.2022.103712 ↗
4. Meghdadi, A.H., and Akbarzadeh-T, M.-R. (2001, January 2–5). Probabilistic fuzzy logic and probabilistic fuzzy systems. Proceedings of the Tenth IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Melbourne, Australia.
5. Waltman, L. (2005). A Theoretical Analysis of Probabilistic Fuzzy Systems. [Ph.D. Dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam].
6. Kaymak, U., van den Berg, J., and van den Bergh, W.-M. (2002, January 12–17). Fuzzy classification using probability-based rule weighting. Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, FUZZ-IEEE’02. Proceedings (Cat. No. 02CH37291), Honolulu, HI, USA.
7. Green supplier selection using fuzzy group decision making methods: A case study from the agri-food industry10.1016/j.cor.2016.02.015 ↗
8. Fuzzy-based failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) of a hybrid molten caronate fuel cell (MCFC) and gas turbine system for marine propulsion10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.028 ↗
9. Fuzzy-FMEA risk evaluation approach for LHD machine–A case study10.1016/j.jsm.2019.08.002 ↗
10. Batbayar, K., Takács, M., and Kozlovszky, M. (2016, January 12–14). Medical device software risk assessment using FMEA and fuzzy linguistic approach: Case study. Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics, Timişoara, Romania.10.1109/SACI.2016.7507369 ↗
11. Risk assessment of an oxygen-enhanced combustor using a structural model based on the FMEA and fuzzy fault tree10.1016/j.jlp.2014.10.004 ↗
12. Using fuzzy logic to reduce risk uncertainty in failure modes and effects analysis10.1007/s40430-018-1437-5 ↗
13. Fuzzy FMEA application to improve purchasing process in a public hospital10.1016/j.asoc.2012.08.007 ↗
14. Chang, T.W., Lo, H.W., Chen, K.Y., and Liou, J.H. (2019). A Novel FMEA Model Based on Rough BWM and Rough TOPSIS-AL for Risk Assessment. Mathematics, 7.10.3390/math7100874 ↗
15. Identifying and evaluating enterprise architecture risks using FMEA and fuzzy VIKOR10.1007/s10845-014-0880-0 ↗
16. Development of a risk-based maintenance decision making approach for automotive production line10.1007/s13198-019-00927-1 ↗
17. Resende, B.A.D., Dedini, F.G., Eckert, J.J., Sigahi, T.F., Pinto, J.D.S., and Anholon, R. (2023). Proposal of a facilitating methodology for fuzzy FMEA implementation with application in process risk analysis in the aeronautical sector. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag.10.1108/IJQRM-07-2023-0237 ↗
18. Probability measures of fuzzy events10.1016/0022-247X(68)90078-4 ↗
19. Almeida, R.J., Verbeek, N., Kaymak, U., and Costa, J.M. (2014). Probabilistic Fuzzy Systems as Additive Fuzzy Systems. Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-08795-5_58 ↗
20. The general probabilistic fuzzy set for modelling and its application in EMG robots10.3233/JIFS-171121 ↗
21. Probabilistic Fuzzy Classification for Stochastic Data10.1109/TFUZZ.2017.2687402 ↗
22. Ma, D., Zhou, Z., Jiang, Y., and Ding, W. (2014, January 18–20). Constructing bayesian network by integrating fmea with fta. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Fourth International Conference on Instrumentation and Measurement, Computer, Communication and Control, Harbin, China.10.1109/IMCCC.2014.148 ↗
23. Mapping FMEA into Bayesian networks
24. Lee, B.H. (2001, January 22–25). Using Bayes belief networks in industrial FMEA modeling and analysis. Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2001 Proceedings, International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity (Cat. No. 01CH37179), IEEE, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
25. Yang, S., Lu, M., Liu, B., and Hao, B. (2009, January 20–24). A fault diagnosis model for embedded software based on FMEA/FTA and bayesian network. Proceedings of the 2009 8th IEEE International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety, Chengdu, China.10.1109/ICRMS.2009.5270082 ↗
26. Dynamic safety assessment of natural gas stations using Bayesian network10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.09.074 ↗
27. Optimized fault diagnosis based on FMEA-style CBR and BN for embedded software system10.1007/s00170-017-0110-y ↗
28. Rastayesh, S., Bahrebar, S., Blaabjerg, F., Zhou, D., Wang, H., and Sørensen, J.D. (2020). A system engineering approach using FMEA and Bayesian network for risk analysis—A case study. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12010077 ↗
29. A manufacturing failure mode and effect analysis based on fuzzy and probabilistic risk analysis10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106689 ↗
30. Failure mode and effects analysis by integrating Bayesian fuzzy assessment number and extended gray relational analysis-technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution method10.1002/qre.2468 ↗
31. Moura, G., and Roisenberg, M. (2015, January 4–7). Probabilistic Fuzzy Naive Bayes. Proceedings of the 2015 Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems, Natal, Brazil.10.1109/BRACIS.2015.48 ↗
32. Application of a Fuzzy Feasibility Bayesian Probabilistic Estimation of supply chain backorder aging, unfilled backorders, and customer wait time using stochastic simulation with Markov blankets10.1016/j.eswa.2014.05.012 ↗
33. Operational risk assessment of ballasting and de-ballasting on-board tanker ship under FMECA extended Evidential Reasoning (ER) and Rule-based Bayesian Network (RBN) approach10.1016/j.ress.2022.108975 ↗