journal article·2024-01-18Open access

Advanced Body Measurement Techniques Can Complement Current Methods of Cytotoxic Chemotherapy Dose Prescription

Michael Thelwell, Neil Masters, Robert Appleyard, Alice May Bullas

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 2

Abstract

Within chemotherapy, estimates of a patient’s body surface area (BSA) are used to calculate drug dosages. However, the use of BSA for calculating chemotherapy dosage has been heavily criticised in previous literature, with potentially significant implications for the effectiveness and toxicity of treatment. BSA has been found to be a poor indicator of optimal drug exposure that does not account for the complex processes of cytotoxic drug distribution and elimination. In addition, differences in BSA estimates between existing formulae have been shown to be so large that they can affect patients’ mortality, particularly in patients with atypical body types. This uncertainty associated with BSA prediction may decrease the confidence of practitioners when determining chemotherapy dosages, particularly with regards to the risk of excess toxicity from over-dosing, or a reduced anti-cancer effect due to under-dosing. The use of national dose-banding in the UK may in some cases account for possible inaccuracies, but the threshold of variance in this case is small (+/−6%). Advanced body measurement techniques, utilising digital tools such as three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging, capture accurate external dimensions and detailed shape characteristics of the human body. Measures of body shape describe morphological variations that cannot be identified by traditional anthropometric techniques and improve the prediction of total body fat and distribution. It is our view that the use of advanced body measurement techniques can provide practitioners with tools for prescribing chemotherapy dosages that are valid for individuals, regardless of their body type.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cancer Risks and Factors · Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life · Cancer survivorship and care

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Sports Engineering Research Group, Sport and Physical Activity Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S9 3TY, UK

Weston Park Cancer Centre, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield S10 2SJ, UK

Centre for Applied Health & Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK

References (96)

Show source-provided references
1. Simple formula for the surface area of the body and a simple model for anthropometry10.1002/ca.20047 ↗
2. Dose calculation of anticancer drugs: A review of the current practice and introduction of an alternative10.1200/JCO.1996.14.9.2590 ↗
3. How to calculate the dose of chemotherapy10.1038/sj.bjc.6600139 ↗
4. Body-surface area as a basis for dosing of anticancer agents: Science, myth, or habit?10.1200/JCO.1998.16.7.2297 ↗
5. Chemotherapy Dosing Part I: Scientific Basis for Current Practice and Use of Body Surface Area10.1016/j.clon.2006.10.010 ↗
6. Chemotherapy Dosing Part II: Alternative Approaches and Future Prospects10.1016/j.clon.2006.10.003 ↗
7. Systemic cancer therapy: Achievements and challenges that lie ahead10.3389/fphar.2013.00057 ↗
8. The use of body surface area as a criterion of drug dosage in cancer chemotherapy
9. Quantitative comparison of toxicity of anticancer agents in mouse, rat, hamster, dog, monkey, and man
10. Cancer chemotherapy and body surface area10.1200/JCO.1998.16.11.3714 ↗
11. Advances in chemotherapy of cancer in man10.1016/S0065-230X(08)60721-6 ↗
12. Role of body surface area in dosing of investigational anticancer agents in adults, 1991–200110.1093/jnci/94.24.1883 ↗
13. Body-surface area-based chemotherapy dosing: Appropriate in the 21st century?10.1200/JCO.2012.44.2863 ↗
14. Appropriate chemotherapy dosing for obese adult patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline10.1200/JCO.2011.39.9436 ↗
15. Prospective evaluation of body surface area as a determinant of paclitaxel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in women with solid tumors: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 976310.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1078 ↗
16. Body surface area formulae: An alarming ambiguity10.1038/srep27966 ↗
17. Conventional-dose chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for metastatic breast cancer. Philadelphia Bone Marrow Transplant Group10.1056/NEJM200004133421501 ↗
18. Tailored fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide compared with marrow-supported high-dose chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for high-risk breast cancer: A randomised trial. Scandinavian Breast Group 9401 study10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02841-5 ↗
19. A review of relative dose intensity and survival in patients with metastatic solid tumors10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.10.006 ↗
20. Incidence and predictors of low dose-intensity in adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy: A nationwide study of community practices10.1200/JCO.2003.05.002 ↗
21. Incidence and predictors of low chemotherapy dose-intensity in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: A nationwide study10.1200/JCO.2004.03.213 ↗
22. Relative Dose Intensity of Chemotherapy and Survival in Patients with Advanced Stage Solid Tumor Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1002/onco.13822 ↗
23. Dose Delays, Dose Reductions, and Relative Total Dose Intensity in Patients With Advanced Cancer Who Exercised During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Treatment10.1177/15347354231168368 ↗
24. Clinical calorimetry: Tenth paper a formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known
25. Is body composition an important variable in the pharmacokinetics of anticancer drugs? A review and suggestions for further research10.1007/BF00686105 ↗
26. Chemotherapy individualization10.1023/A:1023517311879 ↗
27. Ober flachenmessungen des menschlichen korpers
28. A modification of the Du Bois height-weight formula for surface areas of newborn infants10.3181/00379727-19-25 ↗
29. Takahira, H. (1925). No. 1 in Imperial Government Institute of Nutrition Report 1, Rept. Imper. Govt. Inst. For Nutrition.
30. Eine vereinfachte Methodik der K6rperoberflfichenbestimmung
31. Boyd, E. (1935). The Growth of the Surface Area of the Human Body, University of Minnesota Press.
32. Height-weight-surface formula for the estimation of surface area in Chinese subjects
33. Determination of human body surface area from height and weight10.1152/jappl.1954.7.1.1 ↗
34. Determination of the Surface Area of the Body of Indians10.1152/jappl.1955.7.6.585 ↗
35. Choi, W.R. (1956). The Body Surface Area of Koreans. [Ph.D. Thesis, Seoul National University].
36. Body Surface Area of Indians10.1152/jappl.1958.12.1.34 ↗
37. Determination of body surface area in Indian Hindu children10.1152/jappl.1961.16.6.969 ↗
38. Studies on the physical surface area of Japanese. 18. Calculation formulas in three stages over all ages10.1265/jjh.23.443 ↗
39. Estimation of Human Body Surface Area from Height and Weight
40. Geometric method for measuring body surface area: A height-weight formula validated in infants, children, and adults10.1016/S0022-3476(78)80601-5 ↗
41. Simplified calculation of body-surface area10.1056/NEJM198710223171717 ↗
42. A simple calculation to estimate body surface area in adults and its correlation with the Du Bois formula10.1097/00003246-198908000-00035 ↗
43. Body surface area of Africans: A study based on direct measurements of Nigerian males
44. Body surface area: Du Bois and Du Bois revisited10.1007/s004210050679 ↗
45. Body surface area prediction in normal-weight and obese patients10.1152/ajpendo.2001.281.3.E586 ↗
46. Human body surface area: Measurement and prediction using three dimensional body scans10.1007/s004210100484 ↗
47. A formula for the estimation of the body surface area of Saudi male adults
48. The 3D scanner for measuring body surface area: A simplified calculation in the Chinese adult10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00007-3 ↗
49. 3D-Body-Scan als anthropometrisches Verfahren zur Bestimmung der spezifischen Körperoberfläche
50. Human body surface area database and estimation formula10.1016/j.burns.2009.05.013 ↗
51. Body surface assessment with 3D laser-based anthropometry: Reliability, validation, and improvement of empirical surface formulae10.1007/s00421-016-3525-5 ↗
52. BMI compared with 3-dimensional body shape: The UK National Sizing Survey10.1093/ajcn/85.2.419 ↗
53. Clinical consequences of chemotherapy dose reduction in obese patients with stage III colon cancer: A retrospective analysis from the PETACC 3 study10.1016/j.ejca.2018.05.004 ↗
54. Body Composition and Dose-limiting Toxicity in Colorectal Cancer Chemotherapy Treatment; a Systematic Review of the Literature. Could Muscle Mass be the New Body Surface Area in Chemotherapy Dosing?10.1016/j.clon.2021.05.011 ↗
55. (2023, December 05). Statistics on Obesity, Physical Activity and Diet (Replaced by Statistics on Public Health). Available online: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/statistics-on-obesity-physical-activity-and-diet.
56. (2023, December 05). Obesity, Weight and Cancer. Available online: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/causes-of-cancer/obesity-weight-and-cancer.
57. Obesity and Breast Cancer Prognosis: Weight of the Evidence10.1200/JCO.2010.32.1752 ↗
58. Obesity and the outcome of young breast cancer patients in the UK: The POSH study10.1093/annonc/mdu509 ↗
59. Body mass index and survival in women with breast cancer-systematic literature review and meta-analysis of 82 follow-up studies10.1093/annonc/mdu042 ↗
60. Relationship between toxicity and obesity in women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: Results from cancer and leukemia group B study 854110.1200/JCO.1996.14.11.3000 ↗
61. Undertreatment of obese women receiving breast cancer chemotherapy10.1001/archinte.165.11.1267 ↗
62. Risk models for predicting chemotherapy-induced neutropenia10.1634/theoncologist.10-6-427 ↗
63. Mortality, morbidity, and cost associated with febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients10.1002/cncr.21847 ↗
64. Febrile Neutropenia Rates According to Body Mass Index and Dose Capping in Women Receiving Chemotherapy for Early Breast Cancer10.1016/j.clon.2016.02.003 ↗
65. Toxicity and tolerability of adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy in obese women10.1007/s12032-014-0881-z ↗
66. Higher rate of severe toxicities in obese patients receiving dose-dense (dd) chemotherapy according to unadjusted body surface area: Results of the prospectively randomized GAIN study10.1093/annonc/mdw315 ↗
67. Effect of obesity on survival of women with breast cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis10.1007/s10549-010-0990-0 ↗
68. Effect of obesity on toxicity in women treated with adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer: A systematic review10.1007/s10549-012-2213-3 ↗
69. The impact of actual body weight-based chemotherapy dosing and body size on adverse events and outcome in older patients with breast cancer: Results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) trial 49907 (Alliance A151436)10.1016/j.jgo.2017.11.007 ↗
70. Chemotherapy dosing in overweight and obese patients with cancer10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.108 ↗
71. The role of nines: Its history and accuracy10.1097/00006534-196806000-00008 ↗
72. Optimal chemotherapy dosing in a bilateral lower extremities amputee with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma
73. Using body surface area adjustments in amputees
74. Body measurement techniques
75. Current state of the art and enduring issues in anthropometric data collection10.15446/dyna.v83n197.57586 ↗
76. Kinanthropometry study of the physique of disciplined personnel10.1108/09556220010324939 ↗
77. Löffler-Wirth, H., Willscher, E., Ahnert, P., Wirkner, K., Engel, C., Loeffler, M., and Binder, H. (2016). Novel anthropometry based on 3D-bodyscans applied to a large population based cohort. PLoS ONE, 11.10.1371/journal.pone.0159887 ↗
78. Validation of the body scanner as a measuring tool for a rapid quantification of body shape10.1111/j.1600-0846.2009.00374.x ↗
79. (2008). Concise Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford University Press.
80. Thelwell, M., Bullas, A., Kühnapfel, A., Hart, J., Ahnert, P., Wheat, J., Loeffler, M., Scholz, M., and Choppin, S. (2022). Modelling of human torso shape variation inferred by geometric morphometrics. PLoS ONE, 17.10.1371/journal.pone.0265255 ↗
81. Choppin, S., Bullas, A., and Thelwell, M. (2022). Torso Shape Improves the Prediction of Body Fat Magnitude and Distribution. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19148302 ↗
82. Whole-body three-dimensional photonic scanning: A new technique for obesity research and clinical practice10.1038/sj.ijo.0803727 ↗
83. Reliability of 3D laser-based anthropometry and comparison with classical anthropometry10.1038/srep26672 ↗
84. Body composition methods: Comparisons and interpretation10.1177/193229680800200623 ↗
85. Lee, J.J. (2014). Assessment of Body Composition: Total, Central, and Regional Adiposity via Stereovision Body Imaging. [Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Texas].
86. Hume, P.A., and Ackland, T. (2017). Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease, Elsevier.
87. Body composition: Overview of methods and future directions of research10.1159/000177881 ↗
88. Measuring body composition10.1136/adc.2005.085522 ↗
89. How shape-based anthropometry can complement traditional anthropometric techniques: A cross-sectional study10.1038/s41598-020-69099-4 ↗
90. Detailed 3-dimensional body shape features predict body composition, blood metabolites, and functional strength: The Shape Up! Studies10.1093/ajcn/nqz218 ↗
91. Digital anthropometry: A critical review10.1038/s41430-018-0145-7 ↗
92. A machine learning approach relating 3D body scans to body composition in humans10.1038/s41430-018-0337-1 ↗
93. Rahman, S.A., and Adjeroh, D. (2015). Surface-based body shape index and its relationship with all-cause mortality. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0144639 ↗
94. Redlarski, G., Krawczuk, M., and Palkowski, A. (2017, January 11–12). Evaluation of Body Surface Area Formulae Based on 3D Body Scans. Proceedings of the 3DBODY TECH 2017—8th International Conference and Exhibition on 3D Body Scanning and Processing Technologies, Montreal, QC, Canada.10.15221/17.054 ↗
95. Bullas, A.M., Greenwood, R., Thelwell, M., and Choppin, S. (2022). A Review of Commercially Available 3D Surface Imaging Systems for Body Composition Estimation. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12178815 ↗
96. (2024, January 05). Size Stream—Our Technology. Available online: https://www.sizestream.com/technology.