journal article·2023-12-21Open access

Mean Reattachment Length of Roof Separation Bubbles Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition

Hee Jung Ham, Sungsu Lee, Seung Hun Choi, Ho-Jeong Kim

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 1

Abstract

Investigating flow separation regions on the surfaces of three-dimensional bluff bodies in turbulent flows is important because these regions can induce significant aerodynamic loads. Separation bubbles can generate extreme pressures, making the roof components of low-rise buildings vulnerable. In this study, proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) was applied to wind-induced roof pressures to elucidate the physical significance of the dominant modes. Based on the interpretation of the first mode from the POD, the mean reattachment length of the roof separation bubbles on a low-rise building model in turbulent flow was determined. The mean reattachment length derived from the POD was then compared with the length obtained from an aerodynamic database. For the centerline of the roof, the mean reattachment length based on the POD aligned well with that from the aerodynamic database, showing a difference of less than 5%. This study highlights the efficacy of POD as a powerful tool for estimating the reattachment length of separation bubbles on bluff bodies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Wind and Air Flow Studies · Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis · Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Division of Architectural, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea

School of Civil Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea

Institute of Industrial Technology, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea

Department of Architecture, Dankook University, Yongin 16890, Republic of Korea

Funding

Ministry of Interior and Safety (MOIS, Korea)

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Wind tunnel simulation of TTU flow and building roof pressure
2. The flapping shear layer formed by flow separation from the forward corner of a square cylinder10.1017/S0022112094001217 ↗
3. Effects of free stream turbulence on surface pressure fluctuations in a separation bubble10.1017/S0022112096004594 ↗
4. Dynamic characterization of wind pressure fluctuations in separated and reattaching flows10.1177/13694332221086695 ↗
5. Effects of turbulence on the mean pressure field in the separated-reattaching flow above a low-rise building10.1016/j.jweia.2017.09.013 ↗
6. Wind loading on a low-slope gabled roof: Comparison of field measurements, wind tunnel data, and code provisions
7. Full/model scale comparison of surface pressures on the Texas Tech experimental building10.1016/0167-6105(96)00042-6 ↗
8. Fragility assessment for cladding of industrial buildings subjected to extreme wind10.3130/jaabe.12.65 ↗
9. Fragility assessment of light-frame wood construction subjected to wind and earthquake hazards10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:12(1921) ↗
10. Aerodynamic mitigation of wind-induced uplift forces on low-rise buildings: A comparative study10.1016/j.jobe.2016.01.007 ↗
11. Aerodynamic mitigation and shape optimization of buildings: Review10.1016/j.jobe.2016.01.009 ↗
12. 3D Characteristics of separation bubbles around flat roofs by PIV technique
13. Chang, P.K. (1970). Separation of Flow, Elsevier Science.
14. Turbulence and the leading edge phenomenon10.1016/0167-6105(93)90005-9 ↗
15. Bluff-body aerodynamics and turbulence10.1016/0167-6105(93)90006-A ↗
16. Turbulence measurement in a separated and reattaching flow over a backward-facing step with the aid of three-dimensional particle tracking velocimetry10.1016/0167-6105(93)90358-U ↗
17. Akon, F.A. (2017). Effects of Turbulence on the Separating-Reattaching Flow above Surface-Mounted, Three-Dimensional Bluff Bodies. [Ph.D. Thesis, Western University].
18. Flows over surface-mounted bluff bodies with different spanwise widths submerged in a deep turbulent boundary layer10.1017/jfm.2019.617 ↗
19. An experimental investigation of surface pressures in separated and reattaching flows: Effects of freestream turbulence and leading edge geometry10.1016/j.jweia.2017.03.004 ↗
20. Particle image velocimetry—Classical operating rules from today’s perspective10.1016/j.optlaseng.2020.106185 ↗
21. Wall-pressure-array measurements beneath a separating/reattaching flow region10.1063/1.1540633 ↗
22. Koklu, M.A. (2021). A New Method for Predicting Turbulent Flow Reattachment Location: Application of Stratford Criterion for Reattaching Flows, NASA.
23. Roshko, A., and Lau, J.C. (1965, January 21–23). Some observations on transition and reattachment of a free shear layer in incompressible flow. Proceedings of the 1965 Heat Transfer and Fluid Mechanics Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
24. An experimental investigation of a turbulent shear flow with separation, reverse flow, and reattachment10.1017/S0022112086002306 ↗
25. Westphal, R.V., Johnston, J.P., and Eaton, J.K. (1984). Experimental Study of Flow Reattachment in a Single Sided Sudden Expansion, NASA.
26. The UWO contributions to the NIST aerodynamic database for wind loads on low buildings: Part1. Archiving format and basic aerodynamic data10.1016/j.jweia.2004.07.006 ↗
27. The linear-time-invariance notion of the Koopman analysis. Part 2. Dynamic Koopman modes, physics interpretations and phenomenological analysis of the prism wake10.1017/jfm.2023.36 ↗
28. The linear-time-invariance notion to the Koopman analysis: The architecture, pedagogical rendering, and fluid–structure association10.1063/5.0124914 ↗
29. Higher order dynamic mode decomposition of wind pressures on square buildings10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104545 ↗
30. Best practice guidelines for the dynamic mode decomposition from a wind engineering perspective10.1016/j.jweia.2023.105506 ↗
31. Yaglom, A.M., and Tartarsky, V.I. (1967). Atmospheric Turbulence and Radio Wave Propagation, Nauka. [1st ed.].
32. Proper orthogonal decomposition of roof pressure10.1016/0167-6105(93)90074-X ↗
33. Proper orthogonal decomposition and reconstruction of multi-channel roof pressure10.1016/0167-6105(94)00066-M ↗
34. Proper orthogonal decomposition study of approach wind-building pressure correlation10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00270-5 ↗
35. Proper orthogonal decomposition of random wind pressure field10.1006/jfls.1999.0242 ↗
36. Using projection pursuit and proper orthogonal decomposition to identify independent flow mechanisms10.1016/j.jweia.2003.09.041 ↗
37. Su, Y., Di, J., Li, J., and Xia, F. (2022). Wind pressure field reconstruction and prediction of large-span roof structure with folded-plate type based on proper orthogonal decomposition. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12178430 ↗
38. Wang, F., and Lan, K.M. (2017, January 3–7). POD analysis of wind field past rectangular buildings. Proceedings of the 9th Asia Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand.
39. POD analysis for aerodynamic characteristics of tall linked buildings10.1016/j.jweia.2018.09.001 ↗
40. POD analysis of aerodynamic correlations and wind-induced responses of two tall linked buildings10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09.013 ↗
41. Mode interpretation of interference effects between tall buildings in tandem and side-by-side arrangement with POD and ICA10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112616 ↗
42. Study on Phase Characteristics of Wind Pressure Fields around a Prism Using Complex Proper Orthogonal Decomposition10.3390/wind3010004 ↗
43. Panofsky, H., and Dutton, J. (1984). Atmospheric Turbulence, John Wiley & Sons.
44. Weiss, J. (2019, January 17–21). A Tutorial on the proper orthogonal decomposition. Proceedings of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) Aviation 2019 Forum, Dallas, TX, USA.10.2514/6.2019-3333 ↗
45. Proper orthogonal decomposition analysis of the flow field in a plane jet10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2013.06.014 ↗
46. Free-stream turbulence effects on a separation bubble10.1016/0167-6105(83)90039-9 ↗
47. The effect of turbulence intensity on the unsteady gust loading on a 5:1 rectangular cylinder10.1016/j.jweia.2022.104994 ↗