journal article·2023-11-13Open access

Predicting the Remaining Time before Earthquake Occurrence Based on Mel Spectrogram Features Extraction and Ensemble Learning

Bo Zhang, Tao Xu, Wen Chen, Chongyang Zhang

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 22

Abstract

Predicting the remaining time before the next earthquake based on seismic signals generated in a laboratory setting is a challenging research task that is of significant importance for earthquake hazard assessment. In this study, we employed a mel spectrogram and the mel frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC) to extract relevant features from seismic signals. Furthermore, we proposed a deep learning model with a hierarchical structure. This model combines the characteristics of long short-term memory (LSTM), one-dimensional convolutional neural networks (1D-CNN), and two-dimensional convolutional neural networks (2D-CNN). Additionally, we applied a stacking model fusion strategy, combining gradient boosting trees with deep learning models to achieve optimal performance. We compared the performance of the aforementioned feature extraction methods and related models for earthquake prediction. The results revealed a significant improvement in predictive performance when the mel spectrogram and stacking were introduced. Additionally, we found that the combination of 1D-CNN and 2D-CNN has unique advantages in handling time-series problems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Earthquake Detection and Analysis · Seismology and Earthquake Studies · Time Series Analysis and Forecasting

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Petroleum, China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay, Karamay 834000, China

School of Liberature and Science, China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay, Karamay 834000, China

Funding

Basic Scientific Research Business Expenses for Universities in the Autonomous Region: Scientific Research Projects

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Kinematics of subduction processes during the earthquake cycle in Central Chile
2. Earthquake prediction and control10.1126/science.173.3994.316 ↗
3. Recent highlights and future trends in research on earthquake prediction and control10.1029/RG013i003p00361 ↗
4. A physical interpretation of the Haicheng earthquake prediction10.1038/267121a0 ↗
5. Chen, Y., Xue, R., and Zhang, Y. (2021, January 23–26). House price prediction based on machine learning and deep learning methods. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Electronic Information Engineering and Computer Science (EIECS), Changchun, China.10.1109/EIECS53707.2021.9587907 ↗
6. Mehtab, S., Sen, J., and Dutta, A. (2020). Stock Price Prediction Using Machine Learning and LSTM-Based Deep Learning Models. arXiv.10.1109/DASA51403.2020.9317207 ↗
7. Ma, N., Yin, H., and Wang, K. (2023). Prediction of the Remaining Useful Life of Supercapacitors at Different Temperatures Based on Improved Long Short-Term Memory. Energies, 16.10.3390/en16145240 ↗
8. Li, W., Zhang, L.C., Wu, C.H., Wang, Y., Cui, Z., and Niu, C. (2023). A data-driven approach to RUL prediction of tools. Adv. Manuf., 1–13.10.1007/s40436-023-00464-y ↗
9. Deep learning for laboratory earthquake prediction and autoregressive forecasting of fault zone stress10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117825 ↗
10. Earthquake magnitude prediction in Hindukush region using machine learning techniques10.1007/s11069-016-2579-3 ↗
11. Cao, C., Wu, X., Yang, L., Zhang, Q., Wang, X., Yuen, D.A., and Luo, G. (2021). Long short-term memory networks for pattern recognition of synthetical complete earthquake catalog. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13094905 ↗
12. Predicting fault slip via transfer learning10.1038/s41467-021-27553-5 ↗
13. Machine learning based ground motion site amplification prediction10.3389/feart.2023.1053085 ↗
14. Machine learning seismic reservoir prediction method based on virtual sample generation10.1016/j.petsci.2021.09.034 ↗
15. Machine learning-based earthquake catalog and tomography characterize the middle-northern section of the Xiaojiang fault zone
16. Seismic facies analysis using machine learning10.1190/geo2017-0595.1 ↗
17. Machine learning predicts laboratory earthquakes10.1002/2017GL074677 ↗
18. Similarity of fast and slow earthquakes illuminated by machine learning10.1038/s41561-018-0272-8 ↗
19. Predictive model of cooling load for ice storage air-conditioning system by using GBDT10.1016/j.egyr.2021.03.017 ↗
20. CNN disruption predictor at JET: Early versus late data fusion approach10.1016/j.fusengdes.2023.113668 ↗
21. CNN prediction based reversible data hiding10.1109/LSP.2021.3059202 ↗
22. A deformable CNN architecture for predicting clinical acceptability of ECG signal10.1016/j.bbe.2023.01.006 ↗
23. Laboratory earthquake forecasting: A machine learning competition10.1073/pnas.2011362118 ↗
24. Financial time series forecasting model based on CEEMDAN and LSTM10.1016/j.physa.2018.11.061 ↗
25. Time series forecasting of petroleum production using deep LSTM recurrent networks10.1016/j.neucom.2018.09.082 ↗
26. Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, R., Schmidt, K., Amirian-Chakan, A., Rentschler, T., Zeraatpisheh, M., Sarmadian, F., Valavi, R., Davatgar, N., Behrens, T., and Scholten, T. (2020). Improving the spatial prediction of soil organic carbon content in two contrasting climatic regions by stacking machine learning models and rescanning covariate space. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12071095 ↗
27. Shaw, R., Lokshin, A.E., Miller, M.C., Messerlian-Lambert, G., and Moore, R.G. (2022). Stacking machine learning algorithms for biomarker-based preoperative diagnosis of a pelvic mass. Cancers, 14.10.3390/cancers14051291 ↗
28. StackGenVis: Alignment of data, algorithms, and models for stacking ensemble learning using performance metrics10.1109/TVCG.2020.3030352 ↗
29. Multi-stage image denoising with the wavelet transform10.1016/j.patcog.2022.109050 ↗
30. Baldazzi, G., Sulas, E., Urru, M., Tumbarello, R., Raffo, L., and Pani, D. (2020). Wavelet denoising as a post-processing enhancement method for non-invasive foetal electrocardiography. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 195.10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105558 ↗
31. Denoising speech based on deep learning and wavelet decomposition
32. Method for wavelet denoising of multi-angle prestack seismic data10.1007/s11600-022-00842-3 ↗
33. A nonstationary sparse spike deconvolution with anelastic attenuation10.1190/geo2017-0846.1 ↗
34. A deep-learning-based generalized convolutional model for seismic data and its application in seismic deconvolution
35. Multichannel Semi-blind Deconvolution (MSBD) of seismic signals10.1016/j.sigpro.2017.01.026 ↗
36. Stochastic multi-dimensional deconvolution10.1109/TGRS.2022.3179626 ↗
37. Li, Y., Mei, L., Li, R., and Wu, C. (2018). Using noise level to detect frame repetition forgery in video frame rate up-conversion. Future Internet, 10.10.3390/fi10090084 ↗
38. De-noising of ultrasound image using Bayesian approached heavy-tailed Cauchy distribution10.1007/s11042-017-5221-9 ↗
39. Seismic facies analysis based on speech recognition feature parameters10.1190/geo2016-0121.1 ↗
40. A seismic-based feature extraction algorithm for robust ground target classification10.1109/LSP.2012.2209870 ↗
41. Neurogenerative Disease Diagnosis in Cepstral Domain Using MFCC with Deep Learning10.1155/2022/4364186 ↗
42. Noda, J.J., Travieso-González, C.M., Sanchez-Rodriguez, D., and Alonso-Hernández, J.B. (2019). Acoustic classification of singing insects based on MFCC/LFCC fusion. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9194097 ↗
43. DNN-HMM-based speaker-adaptive emotion recognition using MFCC and epoch-based features10.1007/s00034-020-01486-8 ↗
44. Improvise approach for respiratory pathologies classification with multilayer convolutional neural networks10.1007/s11042-022-12958-1 ↗
45. Deep autoencoders for acoustic anomaly detection: Experiments with working machine and in-vehicle audio10.1007/s00521-022-07375-2 ↗