journal article·2023-09-04Open access

Evaluation of the Possibilities Validation of Interval Velocity Models Using Non-Seismic Data and Its Impact on Geological Interpretation of PreSDM Results

Michał Stefaniuk, Adam Cygal, Tomasz Maćkowski, Michał Martuś, Piotr Hadro, Krzysztof Pieniądz, Anna Maria Wachowicz-Pyzik

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 17

Abstract

The paper presents the problem of generation and validation of Velocity Interval Depth (VID) models with the application of non-seismic geophysical and geological data. The study area is a part of the Carpathian Foredeep located close to its contact with the Carpathian Overthrust. In this area of complicated geological structure, hydrocarbon deposits have been successfully explored for decades with seismic methods and drilling. The research applied the Simultaneous Joint Inversion (SJI) of independent geophysical data, which is a modern methodology of geophysical data processing, that is still under development. Such an attempt was necessary due to the lack of a sufficiently dense grid of wells in the study area, in which seismic velocities would be correctly recorded. Such data would be then applied for the generation of relevant VID models, which in turn, could be used to perform the Prestack Depth Migration (PreSDM) procedures. The application of procedures taking advantage of independent geophysical and geological data enabled researchers to control the generation process of the spatial VID model in the areas without wells. The analyses aimed to verify the correctness of VID model evaluation and its influence on the quality of seismic imaging in the area of the Carpathian Overthrust. Precisely, the influence was tested of such non-standard generation procedure of seismic velocity fields, not only on the PreSDM results but also on the geological interpretation of both the Rączyna and the Jodłówka gas deposits. The latter aspect of the presented results seems to be crucial to the effectiveness of petroleum exploration in the transition zone between the Carpathian Orogen and the Carpathian Foredeep.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques · Geological Formations and Processes Exploration · Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Geo-Energy Innovations Sp. z o.o., Czarnowiejska 36/C5/017 Street, 30-054 Kraków, Poland

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Geophysical modeling via simultaneous joint inversion of seismic, gravity, and electromagnetic data: Application to prestack depth imaging10.1190/1.2715057 ↗
2. Coupling strategies in multiparameter geophysical joint inversion10.1093/gji/ggy341 ↗
3. Meju, M., Gallardo, L.A., and Mohamed, A.K. (2003). Evidence for correlation of electrical resistivity and seismic velocity in heterogeneous near-surface materials. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30.10.1029/2002GL016048 ↗
4. Estimation of electrical resistivity using artificial neural networks: A case study from Lublin Basin, SE Poland10.1007/s11600-021-00554-0 ↗
5. Background resistivity model from seismic velocities10.1190/geo2012-0445.1 ↗
6. Some problems of magnetotelluric and gravity structural investigations in the Polish Eastern Carpathians
7. Probulski, J. (2015). Metodyczne podstawy budowania synergicznego pola prędkości dla głębokich badań sejsmicznych w aspekcie interpretacji geologicznej w części karpackiej profilu transkarpackiego–POLCRUST. Nafta Gaz Rok LXXI, 456–464. (In Polish).
8. A velocity function including lithologic variation10.1190/1.1437869 ↗
9. A framework for 3D joint inversion of MT, gravity and seismic refraction data10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04856.x ↗
10. Cygal, A., Pilch, J., Pasternacki, A., Stefaniuk, M., Maćkowski, T., and Ważny, J. (2017, January 12–15). Decreasing uncertainty of joint gravity and seismic inversion by constraining initial models with well and TEM data. Proceedings of the 79th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2017, Paris, France.10.3997/2214-4609.201701299 ↗
11. Pratap, A., Divakar, S., and Srivastava, S. (2021). Deep learning for joint geophysical inversion of seismic and MT data sets. SEG Tech. Program Expand. Abstr., 1741–1745.10.1190/segam2021-3583955.1 ↗
12. Wawrzyniak-Guz, K., Jadwiga, J., Pieniądz, K., and Starzec, K. (2021). Multiple Regression and Modified Faust Equation on Well Logging Data in Application to Seismic Procedures: Polish Outer Carpathians Case Study. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14196300 ↗
13. Estimating electrical resistivity from logging data for oil wells using machine learning10.1007/s13202-023-01617-2 ↗
14. Joint Inversion of Geophysical Data10.1111/j.1365-246X.1975.tb06462.x ↗
15. Integrated magnetotelluric and seismic investigation of Cenozoic graben structure near Obrzycko, Poland10.1007/s11600-020-00534-w ↗
16. Stefaniuk, M., Maćkowski, T., Cygal, A., Figuła, J., and Sada, M. (2015). Kompleksowa i Zintegrowana Interpretacja Danych Sejsmicznych i Elektromagnetycznych w Badaniach Strukturalnych i Poszukiwaniach Naftowych—Complex and Integrated Interpretation of Seismic and Electromagnetic Data in Structural Survey and Oil Prospection, Prace Naukowe Instytutu Nafty i Gazu. (In Polish).
17. Cygal, A., Pilch, J., Stefaniuk, M., and Maćkowski, T. (2016, January 4–8). Application of joint inversion of seismic and gravity data for geological characterization of near surface zone. Proceedings of the 22nd European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Barcelona, Spain.10.3997/2214-4609.201601943 ↗
18. Identification of physical parameter variability in pleistocene and neogene sediment with the implementation of integrated geophysical data inversion
19. Pareto Joint Inversion of 2D Magnetotelluric and Gravity Data—Towards Practical Applications10.1515/acgeo-2016-0035 ↗
20. An application of the NSGA-II algorithm in Pareto joint inversion of 2D magnetic and gravity data10.7494/geol.2021.47.2.59 ↗
21. Joint inversion of marine magnetotelluric and gravity data incorporating seismic constraints. Preliminary results of sub-basalt imaging off the Faroe Shelf, Earth planet
22. Dell’Aversana, P. (2014). Integrated Geophysical Models Combining Rock Physics with Seismic, Electromagnetic and Gravity Data, EAGE Publications BV.10.3997/9789073834927 ↗
23. Joint inversion of rock properties from Sonic, resistivity and density well-log measurements10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00996.x ↗
24. Deep seismic reflection profile in Central Europe reveals complex pattern of Paleozoic and Alpine accretion at the East European Craton margin10.1002/grl.50746 ↗
25. Transcurrent nature of the Teisseyre–Tornquist Zone in Central Europe: Results of the POLCRUST-01 deep reflection seismic profile10.1007/s00531-014-1116-4 ↗
26. Full-waveform inversion of conventional Vibroseis data recorded along a regional profile from southeast Poland10.1093/gji/ggv305 ↗
27. Sejsmogeologiczna dokumentacja perspektyw Odkrycia nowych złóż gazonośnych w piaskowcach mioceńskich pod nasunięciem karpackim między Husowem a Przemyślem/Seismogeologic documentation of prospects for new gas discoveries in Miocene sandstones under the Carpathian overthrust between Husów and Przemyśl
28. Rozwój zapadliska przedkarpackiego w miocenie
29. Sedymentacja utworów miocenu we wschodniej części zapadliska przedkarpackiego
30. Moorkamp, M., Linde, N., Lelièvre, P.G., and KhaLi, A. (2016). Integrated Imaging of the Earth—Theory and Applications, Wiley.10.1002/9781118929063 ↗
31. Joint two-dimensional DC resistivity and seismic travel time inversion with cross gradient constraints10.1029/2003JB002716 ↗
32. 3-D inversion of gravity data10.1190/1.1444302 ↗
33. Królikowski, C., and Petecki, Z. (1995). Atlas grawimetryczny Polski. 1:500000 i 1:750 000, Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny. (In Polish).
34. Zhou, D., O’Connell, D.R.H., Wang, W., and Zhang, J. (2014, January 15–18). 3D joint inversion of seismic traveltime and gravity data: A case study. Proceedings of the SEG Global Meeting Abstracts, Denver, CO, USA.10.1190/segam2014-1556.1 ↗
35. Dwuwymiarowe modelowania grawimetryczne w polskich Karpatach Zachodnich
36. Atlas geofizyczny Karpat
37. Regionalne badania magnetotelluryczne w polskich Karpatach wschodnich
38. Jankowski, L., Kopciowski, R., and Ryłko, W. (2004). Mapa Geologiczna Karpat Zewnętrznych: Pogranicze Polski, Ukrainy i Słowacji/Geological Map of the Outer Carpathiansr: Bordelands of Poland, Ukraine and Slovakia, 1:200,000, Polish Geological Institute. (In Polish).
39. Kasina, Z. (1998). Przetwarzanie Sejsmiczne, Wyd. IGSMiE PAN. (In Polish).
40. Yilmaz, O. (2001). Seismic Data Analysis: Processing, Inversion, and Interpretation of Seismic Data, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.10.1190/1.9781560801580 ↗
41. Hohn, M.E. (2013). Geostatistics and Petroleum Geology, Springer.
42. (2023, August 27). Online Acces to CBDG Portal, (In Polish).
43. Integral Formulation for Migration in Two and Three Dimensions10.1190/1.1440828 ↗
44. Residual moveout in anisotropic angle-domain common-image gathers10.1190/1.2430562 ↗
45. Sava, P., Biondi, B., and Fomel, S. (2001, January 9–14). Amplitude-preserved common image gathers by wave-equation migration. Proceedings of the SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, San Antonio, TX, USA.10.1190/1.1816598 ↗
46. Rapid calculation of seismic amplitudes10.1190/1.1442798 ↗
47. Nolan, C.J., and Symes, W.W. (1996). Imaging and Coherency in Complex Structures, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.10.1190/1.1826642 ↗
48. Cox, M. (1999). Static Corrections for Seismic Reflection Surveys, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, SEG Books.10.1190/1.9781560801818 ↗
49. Formation velocity and density—The diagnostic basics for stratigraphic traps10.1190/1.1440465 ↗
50. Mavko, G., Mukerji, T., and Dvorkin, J. (2010). The Rock Physics Handbook, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511626753 ↗