Research on the Construction Method of a Training Image Library Based on cDCGAN
Source abstract
Abstract
There is a close relationship between the size and property of a reservoir and the production and capacity. Therefore, in the process of oil and gas field exploration and development, it is of great importance to study the macro distribution of oil–gas reservoirs, the inner structure, the distribution of reservoir parameters, and the dynamic variation of reservoir characteristics. A reservoir model is an important bridge between first-hand geologic data and other results such as ground stress models and fracture models, and the quality of the model can influence the evaluation of the sweet spots, the deployment of a horizontal well, and the optimization of the well network. Reservoir facies modeling and physical parameter modeling are the key points in reservoir characterization and modeling. Deep learning, as an artificial intelligence method, has been shown to be a powerful tool in many fields, such as data fusion, feature extraction, pattern recognition, and nonlinear fitting. Thus, deep learning can be used to characterize the reservoir features in 3D space. In recent years, there have been increasing attempts to apply deep learning in the oil and gas industry, and many scholars have made attempts in logging interpretation, seismic processing and interpretation, geological modeling, and petroleum engineering. Traditional training image construction methods have drawbacks such as low construction efficiency and limited types of sedimentary facies. For this purpose, some of the problems of the current reservoir facies modeling are solved in this paper. This study constructs a method that can quickly generate multiple types of sedimentary facies training images based on deep learning. Based on the features and merits of all kinds of deep learning methods, this paper makes some improvements and optimizations to the conventional reservoir facies modeling. The main outcomes of this thesis are as follows: (a) the construction of a training image library for reservoir facies modeling is realized. (b) the concept model of the typical sedimentary facies domain is used as a key constraint in the training image library. In order to construct a conditional convolutional adversarial network model, One-Hot and Distributed Representation is used to label the dataset. (c) The method is verified and tested with typical sedimentary facies types such as fluvial and delta. The results show that this method can generate six kinds of non-homogeneous and homogeneous training images that are almost identical to the target sedimentary facies in terms of generation quality. In terms of generating result formats, compared to the cDCGAN training image generation method, traditional methods took 31.5 and 9 times longer. In terms of generating result formats, cDCGAN can generate more formats than traditional methods. Furthermore, the method can store and rapidly generate the training image library of the typical sedimentary facies model of various types and styles in terms of generation efficiency.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis · Geological Modeling and Analysis · Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
China National Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Company Ltd., PetroChina, Beijing 100034, China
Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China
School of Space and Earth Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Funding
Project of R&D Department of Petrochina · Innovation fund of Petrochina
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Application of unsupervised learning and deep learning for rock type prediction and petrophysical characterization using multi-scale data10.1016/j.geoen.2023.212241 ↗
2. Performance analysis for a model of a multi-wing hydraulically fractured vertical well in a coalbed methane gas reservoir10.1016/j.petrol.2018.03.038 ↗
3. Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Guo, W., Kang, L., Yu, R., and Sun, Y. (2022). An Approach for Predicting the Effective Stress Field in Low-Permeability Reservoirs Based on Reservoir-Geomechanics Coupling. Processes, 10.10.3390/pr10040633 ↗
4. Feasibility evaluation of CO2 EOR and storage in tight oil reservoirs: A demonstration project in the Ordos Basin10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125652 ↗
5. Development of the automated temperature control system of the main gas pipeline10.1038/s41598-023-29570-4 ↗
6. Liu, S., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Guo, W., Kang, L., Yu, R., and Sun, Y. (2022). Geological and Engineering Integrated Shale Gas Sweet Spots Evaluation Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method: A Case Study of Z Shale Gas Field HB Block. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15020602 ↗
7. A semi-analytical model for the transient pressure behaviors of a multiple fractured well in a coal seam gas reservoir10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108159 ↗
8. Yao, J., Liu, Q., Liu, W., Liu, Y., Chen, X., and Pan, M. (2020). 3D Reservoir Geological Modeling Algorithm Based on a Deep Feedforward Neural Network: A Case Study of the Delta Reservoir of Upper Urho Formation in the X Area of Karamay, Xinjiang, China. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13246699 ↗
9. Pershin, I.M., Papush, E.G., Kukharova, T.V., and Utkin, V.A. (2023). Modeling of Distributed Control System for Network of Mineral Water Wells. Water, 15.10.3390/w15122289 ↗
10. 3D geological model-based hydraulic fracturing parameters optimization using geology–engineering integration of a shale gas reservoir: A case study10.1016/j.egyr.2022.08.003 ↗
11. Marinina, O., Nechitailo, A., Stroykov, G., Tsvetkova, A., Reshneva, E., and Turovskaya, L. (2023). Technical and Economic Assessment of Energy Efficiency of Electrification of Hydrocarbon Production Facilities in Underdeveloped Areas. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15129614 ↗
12. Application and development trend of artificial intelligence in petroleum exploration and development10.1016/S1876-3804(21)60001-0 ↗
13. Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Guo, W., Kang, L., Gao, J., Yu, R., Sun, Y., and Pan, M. (2022). Research Status of and Trends in 3D Geological Property Modeling Methods: A Review. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12115648 ↗
14. Yao, J., Liu, W., Liu, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, X., and Pan, M. (2021). Optimized algorithm for multipoint geostatistical facies modeling based on a deep feedforward neural network. PLoS ONE, 16.10.1371/journal.pone.0253174 ↗
15. A training image optimization method in multiple-point geostatistics and its application in geological modeling10.1016/S1876-3804(19)60231-4 ↗
16. The necessity of a multiple-point prior model10.1007/s11004-006-9031-2 ↗
17. Incorporating geological conceptual models and interpretations into reservoir modeling using multiple-point geostatistics10.1016/S1872-5791(08)60016-0 ↗
18. Zhang, T., McCormick, D., Hurley, N., and Signer, C. (2007, January 9–11). Applying multiple-point geostatistics to reservoir modeling—A practical perspective. Proceedings of the EAGE Conference on Petroleum Geostatistics, Cascais, Portugal.10.3997/2214-4609.201403044 ↗
19. Advances in Multiple-point Geostatistics Modeling
20. TiGenerator: Object-based training image generator10.1016/j.cageo.2007.08.012 ↗
21. A practical guide to performing multiple-point statistical simulations with the Direct Sampling algorithm10.1016/j.cageo.2012.09.019 ↗
22. TiConverter: A training image converting tool for multiple-point geostatistics10.1016/j.cageo.2016.07.002 ↗
23. Depositional conditioning of three dimensional training images: Improving the reproduction and representation of architectural elements in sand-dominated fluvial reservoir models10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.104156 ↗
24. Core scale investigation of fluid flow in the heterogeneous porous media based on X-ray computed tomography images: Upscaling and history matching approaches10.1016/j.geoen.2023.211716 ↗
25. Investigation of pore geometry influence on fluid flow in heterogeneous porous media: A pore-scale study10.1016/j.engeos.2023.100222 ↗
26. Haldorsen, H.H., and Chang, D.M. (1986). Reservoir Characterization, Academic Press.
27. Fluvsim: Hierarchical object-based stochastic modeling of fluvial reservoirs10.1007/BF02066005 ↗
28. FLUVSIM: A program for object-based stochastic modeling of fluvial depositional systems10.1016/S0098-3004(01)00075-9 ↗
29. Bend theory of river meanders. Part 1. Linear development10.1017/S0022112081000451 ↗
30. Mariethoz, G., and Caers, J. (2014). Multiple-Point Geostatistics: Stochastic Modeling with Training Images, Wiley.10.1002/9781118662953 ↗
31. Paleoclimatic signature in terrestrial flood deposits10.1126/science.256.5065.1775 ↗
32. ALLUVSIM: A program for event-based stochastic modeling of fluvial depositional systems10.1016/j.cageo.2008.09.012 ↗
33. Establishment of training images of turbidity channels in deep waters and application of multi-point geostatistical modeling
34. A workflow for modelling fluvial meander-belt successions: Combining forward stratigraphic modelling and multi-point geostatistics10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108411 ↗
35. Mirza, M., and Osindero, S. (2014). Conditional Generative Adversarial Nets. arXiv.
36. A survey on distributed word representation
37. Hinton, G.E. (1986, January 15–17). Learning distributed representations of concepts. Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Amherst, MA, USA.
38. Overview of deep learning