journal article·2023-08-17Open access

Gender Dimorphism in Maxillary Permanent Canine Odontometrics Based on a Three-Dimensional Digital Method and Discriminant Function Analysis in the Saudi Population

Yousef Majed Almugla, Guna Shekhar Madiraju, Rohini Mohan, Sajith Abraham

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 16

Abstract

The present study aimed to analyze the gender dimorphism in odontometrics of permanent maxillary canines using a three-dimensional digital method and to test the accuracy in gender estimation using discriminant function analysis in a sample of the Saudi population. A total of 120 diagnostic dental casts of patients aged 16–29 years were used in the present study. Plaster models of their maxillary dentition obtained from the archives were scanned and digitally measured using a three-dimensional digital method. The mesiodistal width of the right and left maxillary canines and intercanine distance were measured. Gender dimorphism was established using the Garn method. Data were statistically analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Mann–Whitney U test and discriminant analyses. Males showed larger mean dimensions of canines than females with regard to both mesiodistal width and intercanine distance, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The right maxillary canine mesiodistal width showed a higher percentage of gender dimorphism (3.5%). Discriminant function analysis showed that the overall accuracy of gender prediction was 80.5% for the multivariate analysis. The univariate discriminant function equation revealed that intercanine distance was the most accurate predictor of gender (78%), followed by the right canine mesiodistal width (76.3%). The use of three-dimensional technology for odontometrics presents a promising method, and permanent maxillary canine parameters can be used as an acceptable ancillary tool for gender estimation in forensic science.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies · dental development and anomalies · Dental Radiography and Imaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty in Orthodontics, Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia

Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia

Community Dental Services, Port Talbot Research Centre, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Port Talbot SA12 7BJ, UK

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Cheiloscopy: Revisited10.4103/0975-1475.99167 ↗
2. Gender determination analysis using anthropometrical dimensions of 2D:4D, foot index and mandibular canine index10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_285_19 ↗
3. Moriyama, H. (2013). Gender Dimorphism [Internet], IntechOpen.10.5772/2960 ↗
4. Comparing two methods of univariate discriminant analysis for gender discrimination in an Iberian population
5. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: A systematic review10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01503.x ↗
6. Gender determination of adult individuals by three-dimensional modeling of canines10.1111/1556-4029.12821 ↗
7. Mesiodistal tooth width and tooth size discrepancies of Yemeni Arabians: A pilot study10.4103/2278-0203.99760 ↗
8. Beschiu, L.M., Ardelean, L.C., Tigmeanu, C.V., and Rusu, L.-C. (2022). Cranial and Odontological Methods for Gender Estimation—A Scoping Review. Medicina, 58.10.3390/medicina58091273 ↗
9. Proffit, M.R., Field, H.W., Ackerman, J.L., Thompson, P.M., and Tullock, S.A. (1984). Contemporary Orthodontics, CV Mosby Co.
10. Odontometrical method useful in determining gender and dental alignment10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00399-1 ↗
11. Mesiodistal width of canines: A tool for gender determination10.1258/msl.2011.010152 ↗
12. Buccolingual size asymmetry and its developmental meaning
13. Neves, J.A., Antunes-Ferreira, N., Machado, V., Botelho, J., Proença, L., Quintas, A., Mendes, J.J., and Delgado, A.S. (2020). Gender Prediction Based on Mesiodistal Width Data in the Portuguese Population. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10124156 ↗
14. Tooth Crown Mesiodistal Measurements for the Determination of Sexual Dimorphism across a Range of Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
15. Sexual dimorphism in odontometric parameters using cone beam CT: A systematic review10.1186/s13005-023-00352-7 ↗
16. Dimorphism of mandibular and maxillary canine teeth in establishing identity
17. Odontometric analysis of permanent canines in gender determination10.2298/ABS1304279F ↗
18. Gender determination using the mesio-distal dimension of permanent maxillary incisors and canines in a modern Chilean population10.1016/j.scijus.2015.10.002 ↗
19. Mesiodistal dimensions and gender dimorphism of teeth of contemporary Western Australian adolescents10.2334/josnusd.20-0596 ↗
20. Mesiodistal tooth width. A comparison between Saudi males and females. Part 1
21. Intermaxillary tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion classes: A comparative study10.17796/jcpd.26.4.j46352g860700614 ↗
22. Tooth Size Ratios in Saudi Subjects with Class II, Division 1 Malocclusion
23. Gender determination in forensic odontology: A review10.4103/0975-7406.163469 ↗
24. Permanent Maxillary Odontometrics for Gender Estimation Based on a 3-Dimensional Digital Method10.12659/MSM.933450 ↗
25. Gamulin, O., Skrabic, M., Serec, K., Par, M., Bakovic, M., Krajacic, M., Babic, S.D., Segedin, N., Osmani, A., and Vodanovic, M. (2021). Possibility of human gender recognition using Raman spectra of teeth. Molecules, 26.10.3390/molecules26133983 ↗
26. Methodological accuracy of digital and manual model analysis in orthodontics—A retrospective clinical study10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.04.012 ↗
27. Accuracy, reproducibility, and time efficiency of dental measurements using different technologies10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.10.012 ↗
28. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning10.1016/j.ortho.2019.01.014 ↗
29. Comparative assessment of maxillary canine index and maxillary first molar dimensions for gender determination in forensic odontology10.4103/jfo.jfds_4_16 ↗
30. Establishment of gender dimorphism in North Indian population by odontometric study of permanent maxillary canine10.4172/2157-7145.1000224 ↗
31. Establishment of gender dimorphism using maxillary canine of the university of maiduguri students, Nigeria
32. Odontometric analysis of canines to establish gender dimorphism in an urban population10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_75_18 ↗
33. Alanazi, A.A., Almutair, A.M., Alhubayshi, A., Almalki, A., Naqvi, Z.A., Alassaf, A., Almulhim, B., Alghamdi, S.A., and Mallineni, S.K. (2022). Morphometric Analysis of Permanent Canines: Preliminary Findings on Odontometric Gender Dimorphism. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19042109 ↗
34. Mandibular canine index: A study for gender determination in Gandhinagar population
35. Gender determination by odontometric method
36. Advanced procedures for skull gender estimation using genderly dimorphic morphometric features10.1007/s00414-020-02334-9 ↗
37. Uabundit, N., Chaiyamoon, A., Iamsaard, S., Yurasakpong, L., Nantasenamat, C., Suwannakhan, A., and Phunchago, N. (2021). Classification and morphometric features of pterion in Thai population with potential gender prediction. Medicina, 57.10.3390/medicina57111282 ↗
38. Comparison of Accuracy of Current Ten Intraoral Scanners10.1155/2021/2673040 ↗