journal article·2023-06-13Open access

A Multivariate Machine Learning Model of Adsorptive Lindane Removal from Contaminated Water

Adeola Akeem Akinpelu, Mazen K. Nazal, Md Shafiullah, Md Kamrul Islam, Mohammed Monirul Islam, Aminur Rahman, Syed Masiur Rahman, Muhammad Muhitur Rahman

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 12

Abstract

It is challenging to use conventional one-variable-at-time (OVAT) batch experiments to evaluate multivariate/inter-parametric interactions between physico-chemical variables that contribute to the adsorptive removal of contaminants. Thus, chemometric prediction approaches for multivariate calibration and analysis reveal the impact of multi-parametric variation on the process of concern. Hence, we aim to develop an artificial neural network (ANN), and stepwise regression (SR) models for multivariate calibration and analysis utilizing OVAT data prepared through experimentation. After comparing the models’ performance, ANN was the superior model for this application in our work. The standard deviations (SD) between the observed and ANN-predicted values were very close. The average correlation coefficient (R2) between observed and ANN-predicted values for the training dataset was 96.9%. This confirms the ability of our developed ANN model to forecast lindane removal accurately. The testing dataset correlation coefficients (89.9% for ANN and 67.75% for SR) demonstrated a better correlation between observed and predicted ANN values. The ANN model training and testing dataset RMSE values were 1.482 and 2.402, lower than the SR values of 4.035 and 3.890. The MAPE values for the ANN model’s training and testing datasets, 0.018 and 0.031, were lower than those for the SR model. The training and testing datasets have low RSR and PBIAS values, implying model strength. The R2 and WIA values are above 0.90 for both datasets, proving the ANN model’s accuracy. Applying our developed ANN model will reduce the cost of removing inorganic and organic impurities, including lindane, and optimize chemical utilization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrological Forecasting Using AI · Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting · Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Applied Research Center for Environment & Marine Studies, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia

Interdisciplinary Research Center for Renewable Energy and Power Systems, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia

Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Clinical Pharmacy, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research at King Faisal University (KFU), Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Remediation of Lindane Contaminated Soil by Fluidization-like Dielectric Barrier Discharge10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130164 ↗
2. Diversity-Triggered Bottom-up Trophic Interactions Impair Key Soil Functions under Lindane Pollution Stress10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120293 ↗
3. Biodegradation of Lindane (γ-Hexachlorocyclohexane) and Other Isomers by Bacillus Subtilis Strain Mz-13i10.1016/j.bcab.2023.102630 ↗
4. Kinetics and Mechanism of Sulfate Radical- and Hydroxyl Radical-Induced Degradation of Highly Chlorinated Pesticide Lindane in UV/Peroxymonosulfate System10.1016/j.cej.2016.05.150 ↗
5. Testing Different Strategies for the Remediation of Soils Polluted with Lindane10.1016/j.cej.2019.122674 ↗
6. Association between Environmental Exposure to p, P′-DDE and Lindane and Semen Quality10.1007/s11356-014-2965-x ↗
7. Bioremediation of Lindane-Contaminated Soils by Combining of Bioaugmentation and Biostimulation: Effective Scaling-up from Microcosms to Mesocosms10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111309 ↗
8. Akinpelu, A.A., Nazal, M.K., and Abuzaid, N. (2021). Adsorptive Removal of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Contaminated Water by Biomass from Dead Leaves of Halodule Uninervis: Kinetic and Thermodynamic Studies. Biomass Convers. Biorefin., in press.10.1007/s13399-021-01718-0 ↗
9. Iron Oxide Permeated Mesoporous Rice-Husk Nanobiochar (IPMN) Mediated Removal of Dissolved Arsenic (As): Chemometric Modelling and Adsorption Dynamics10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.008 ↗
10. Modeling and Optimization of Process Parameters of the Piston Alloy-Based Composite Produced by Fsp Using Response Surface Methodology10.1142/S0218625X23500415 ↗
11. Biosorption of Zn2+, Ni2+ and Co2+ from Water Samples onto Yarrowia Lipolytica ISF7 Using a Response Surface Methodology, and Analyzed by Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES)10.1039/C5RA27170C ↗
12. Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Water Treatment for Optimization and Automation of Adsorption Processes: Recent Advances and Prospects10.1016/j.cej.2021.130011 ↗
13. Intelligent Fault Diagnosis for Distribution Grid Considering Renewable Energy Intermittency10.1007/s00521-022-07155-y ↗
14. A Review of Microgrid Energy Management and Control Strategies10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3248511 ↗
15. Multivariate Optimization of Mechanical and Microstructural Properties of Welded Joints by FSW Method10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106528 ↗
16. Breaux, H.J. (1967). On Stepwise Multiple Linear Regression, Army Ballistic Research Lab Aberdeen Proving Ground MD.10.21236/AD0658674 ↗
17. Liu, W.-J., Niu, X.-J., Yang, N., Tan, Y.-S., Qiao, Y., Liu, C.-F., Wu, K., Li, Q.-B., and Hu, Y. (2021). Prediction Model of Concrete Initial Setting Time Based on Stepwise Regression Analysis. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14123201 ↗
18. A Comparison of Approaches to Stepwise Regression on Variables Sensitivities in Building Simulation and Analysis10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.065 ↗
19. Stepwise Model Fitting and Statistical Inference: Turning Noise into Signal Pollution10.1086/593303 ↗
20. A Stepwise Multiple Regression Model to Predict Fusarium Wilt in Lentil10.1002/met.2088 ↗
21. Loftus, J.R., and Taylor, J.E. (2023, April 13). A Significance Test for Forward Stepwise Model Selection. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.3920.
22. What Are Artificial Neural Networks?10.1038/nbt1386 ↗
23. Ali, A., Almutairi, K., Malik, M.Z., Irshad, K., Tirth, V., Algarni, S., Zahir, M.H., Islam, S., Shafiullah, M., and Shukla, N.K. (2020). Review of Online and Soft Computing Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques under Non-Uniform Solar Irradiation Conditions. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13123256 ↗
24. The Application of Artificial Neural Networks to the Problem of Reservoir Classification and Land Use Determination on the Basis of Water Sediment Composition10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.012 ↗
25. Neurogenetic Modeling of Energy Demand in the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar10.1002/ep.12558 ↗
26. Ismail Hossain, M., Shafiullah, M., and Abido, M. (2020, January 1–3). Induction Motor Speed Control Employing LM-NN Based Adaptive PI Controller. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality (ICREPQ’20), Granada, Spain.10.24084/repqj18.239 ↗
27. Haykin, S. (2009). Neural Networks and Learning Machines, Pearson Education, Inc.. [3rd ed.].
28. Aljohani, A., Aljurbua, A., Shafiullah, M., and Abido, M.A. (2018, January 19–22). Smart Fault Detection and Classification for Distribution Grid Hybridizing ST and MLP-NN. Proceedings of the 2018 15th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD), Yasmine Hammamet, Tunisia.10.1109/SSD.2018.8570582 ↗
29. S-Transform Based FFNN Approach for Distribution Grids Fault Detection and Classification10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2809045 ↗
30. Spatial Prediction Models for Shallow Landslide Hazards: A Comparative Assessment of the Efficacy of Support Vector Machines, Artificial Neural Networks, Kernel Logistic Regression, and Logistic Model Tree10.1007/s10346-015-0557-6 ↗
31. Levenberg–Marquardt Neural Network to Estimate UPFC-Coordinated PSS Parameters to Enhance Power System Stability10.1007/s00521-017-3156-8 ↗
32. Sanjeevikumar, P., Sharmeela, C., Holm-Nielsen, J.B., and Sivaraman, P. (2021). Power Quality in Modern Power Systems, Academic Press.
33. Extreme Learning Machine for Regression and Multiclass Classification10.1109/TSMCB.2011.2168604 ↗
34. Liu, H., and Lang, B. (2019). Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for Intrusion Detection Systems: A Survey. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9204396 ↗
35. A Novel RBF Training Algorithm for Short-Term Electric Load Forecasting and Comparative Studies10.1109/TIE.2015.2424399 ↗
36. Artificial Neural Network and Statistical Modelling of Biosorptive Removal of Hexavalent Chromium Using Macroalgal Spent Biomass10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133965 ↗
37. Congo Red Dye Removal from Aqueous Environment by Cationic Surfactant Modified-Biomass Derived Carbon: Equilibrium, Kinetic, and Thermodynamic Modeling, and Forecasting via Artificial Neural Network Approach10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133346 ↗
38. Modelling Dye Removal by Adsorption onto Water Treatment Residuals Using Combined Response Surface Methodology-Artificial Neural Network Approach10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.017 ↗
39. Comparative Study of Direct Immersion and Headspace Single Drop Microextraction Techniques for BTEX Determination in Water Samples Using GC-FID
40. Computational Intelligence for Empirical Modeling and Optimization of Methylene Blue Adsorption Phenomena Using Available Local Zeolites and Clay of Morocco10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133517 ↗
41. Modeling of Adsorption of Methylene Blue Dye on Ho-CaWO4 Nanoparticles Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Techniques10.1016/j.mex.2019.07.016 ↗
42. A Support Vector Regression Model for the Prediction of Total Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil: An Artificial Intelligent System for Mapping Environmental Pollution10.1007/s00521-020-04845-3 ↗
43. Lewis, C.D. (1982). Industrial and Business Forecasting Methods: A Practical Guide to Exponential Smoothing and Curve Fitting, Butterworth Scientific.
44. Shafiullah, M., Abido, M.A., and Al-Mohammed, A.H. (2022). Power System Fault Diagnosis: A Wide Area Measurement Based Intelligent Approach, Elsevier. [1st ed.].
45. Van Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations10.13031/2013.23153 ↗
46. A Refined Index of Model Performance10.1002/joc.2419 ↗
47. The Adsorptive Removal of as (III) Using Biomass of Arsenic Resistant Bacillus Thuringiensis Strain WS3: Characteristics and Modelling Studies10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.01.067 ↗