journal article·2023-03-11Open access

A Blind Image Quality Index for Synthetic and Authentic Distortions with Hierarchical Feature Fusion

Lingbi Hu, Juan Peng, Tuoxun Zhao, Wei Yu, Bo Hu

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 6

Abstract

Blind Image Quality Assessment (BIQA) for synthetic and authentic distortions has attracted much attention in the community, and it is still a great challenge. The existing quality metrics are mildly consistent with subjective perception. Traditional handcrafted quality metrics can easily and directly extract low-level features, which mainly account for the outline, edge, color, texture, and shape features, while ignoring the important deep semantics of the distorted image. In the field of popular deep learning, multilevel features can be acquired easily. However, most of them either use only high-level features, ignoring the shallow features, or they simply combine features at different levels, resulting in limited prediction performance. Motivated by these, this paper presents a novel BIQA for synthetic and authentic distortions with hierarchical feature fusion in a flexible vision-Transformer framework. First, multiscale features are extracted from a strong vision-Transformer backbone. Second, an effective hierarchical feature fusion module is proposed to incorporate the features at different levels progressively. To eliminate redundant information, a simple but effective attention mechanism is employed after each fusion. Third, inspired by the human visual system, local and global features from the fusion features are extracted to represent different granularity distortions. Finally, these local and global features are mapped to the final quality score. Extensive experiments on three authentic image databases and two synthetic image datasets show that the proposed method is superior to the state-of-the-art quality metrics for both single-database testing and cross-database testing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Image and Video Quality Assessment · Advanced Image Fusion Techniques · Visual Attention and Saliency Detection

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Software and Artificial Intelligence, Chongqing Institute of Engineering, Chongqing 400056, China

Chongqing Key Laboratory of Image Cognition, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China

Engineering and Technical College, Chengdu University of Technology, Leshan 614000, China

Funding

Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. Mohan, C., Kiran, S., and Vasudeva, V. (2023). Improved procedure for multi-focus image quality enhancement using image fusion with rules of texture energy measures in the hybrid wavelet domain. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13042138 ↗
2. You, N., Han, L., Zhu, D., and Song, W. (2023). Research on image denoising in edge detection based on wavelet transform. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13031837 ↗
3. Pairwise-comparison-based rank learning for benchmarking image restoration algorithms10.1109/TMM.2019.2894958 ↗
4. Subjective and objective quality assessment for image restoration: A critical survey10.1016/j.image.2020.115839 ↗
5. Ribeiro, R., Trifan, A., and Neves, A. (2023). Blind image quality assessment with deep learning: A replicability study and its reproducibility in lifelogging. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13010059 ↗
6. Degraded reference image quality assessment10.1109/TIP.2023.3234498 ↗
7. Ryu, J. (2022). A Visual saliency-based neural network architecture for no-reference image quality assessment. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12199567 ↗
8. Generalizable no-reference image quality assessment via deep meta-learning10.1109/TCSVT.2021.3073410 ↗
9. No-reference quality assessment of compressive sensing image recovery10.1016/j.image.2017.08.003 ↗
10. Internal generative mechanism driven blind quality index for deblocked images10.1007/s11042-018-6823-6 ↗
11. Blind image quality assessment using local consistency aware retriever and uncertainty aware evaluator10.1109/TCSVT.2017.2710419 ↗
12. Gradient magnitude similarity deviation: A highly efficient perceptual image quality index10.1109/TIP.2013.2293423 ↗
13. VSI: A visual saliency-induced index for perceptual image quality assessment10.1109/TIP.2014.2346028 ↗
14. Sparse feature fidelity for perceptual image quality assessment10.1109/TIP.2013.2266579 ↗
15. Reduced-reference image quality assessment using reorganized DCT-based image representation10.1109/TMM.2011.2109701 ↗
16. Reduced reference image quality assessment in free-energy principle and sparse representation10.1109/TMM.2017.2729020 ↗
17. Attended visual content degradation based reduced reference image quality assessment10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2798573 ↗
18. Multi-channel decomposition in tandem with free-energy principle for reduced reference image quality assessment10.1109/TMM.2019.2902484 ↗
19. Blind quality assessment of tone-mapped images via analysis of information, naturalness, and structure10.1109/TMM.2016.2518868 ↗
20. Zhu, H., Li, L., Wu, J., Dong, W., and Shi, G. (2022, January 13–19). MetaIQA: Deep meta-learning for no-reference image quality assessment. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01415 ↗
21. A feature-enriched completely blind image quality evaluator10.1109/TIP.2015.2426416 ↗
22. No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain10.1109/TIP.2012.2214050 ↗
23. End-to-end blind image quality assessment using deep neural networks10.1109/TIP.2017.2774045 ↗
24. Deep neural networks for no-reference and full-reference image quality assessment10.1109/TIP.2017.2760518 ↗
25. Su, S., Yan, Q., Zhu, Y., Zhang, C., Ge, X., Sun, J., and Zhang, Y. (2020, January 13–19). Blindly assess image quality in the wild guided by a self-adaptive hyper network. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00372 ↗
26. Ye, P., Kumar, J., Kang, L., and Doermann, D. (2012, January 16–21). Unsupervised feature learning framework for no-reference image quality assessment. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, Providence, RI, USA.
27. Making a “completely blind” image quality analyzer10.1109/LSP.2012.2227726 ↗
28. Blind image quality assessment based on high order statistics aggregation10.1109/TIP.2016.2585880 ↗
29. Blind image quality assessment: A natural scene statistics approach in the DCT domain10.1109/TIP.2012.2191563 ↗
30. On the use of deep learning for blind image quality assessment10.1007/s11760-017-1166-8 ↗
31. Kim, J., Nguyen, A., Ahn, S., Luo, C., and Lee, S. (2018, January 7–10). Multiple level feature-based universal blind image quality assessment model. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Athens, Greece.10.1109/ICIP.2018.8451346 ↗
32. Blind image quality prediction by exploiting multi-level deep representations10.1016/j.patcog.2018.04.016 ↗
33. Sang, Q., Wu, L., Li, C., and Wu, X. (2017, January 14–17). No-reference quality assessment for multiply distorted images based on deep learning. Proceedings of the 2017 International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2), Wuxi, China.10.1109/ISC2.2017.8090875 ↗
34. Fully deep blind image quality predictor10.1109/JSTSP.2016.2639328 ↗
35. Zeng, H., Zhang, L., and Bovik, A. (2018, January 7–10). A probabilistic quality representation approach to deep blind image quality prediction. Proceedings of the 2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Athens, Greece.
36. Ren, H., Chen, D., and Wang, Y. (2018, January 4–9). RAN4IQA: Restorative adversarial nets for no-reference image quality assessment. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1609/aaai.v32i1.12258 ↗
37. Which has better visual quality: The clear blue sky or a blurry animal?10.1109/TMM.2018.2875354 ↗
38. Naturalness-aware deep no-reference image quality assessment10.1109/TMM.2019.2904879 ↗
39. Blind image quality assessment using a deep bilinear convolutional neural network10.1109/TCSVT.2018.2886771 ↗
40. End-to-end blind image quality prediction with cascaded deep neural network10.1109/TIP.2020.3002478 ↗
41. Blind image quality assessment for authentic distortions by intermediary enhancement and iterative training10.1109/TCSVT.2022.3179744 ↗
42. Carion, N., Massa, F., Synnaeve, G., Usunier, N., Kirillov, A., and Zagoruyko, S. (2020). End-to-end object detection with transformers. arXiv.10.1007/978-3-030-58452-8_13 ↗
43. Xie, E., Wang, W., Yu, Z., Anandkumar, A., Alvarez, J., and Luo, P. (, January 6–14). SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformers. Proceedings of the 2021 Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Montreal, QC, Canada.
44. Meinhardt, T., Kirillov, A., Leal-Taixe, L., and Feichtenhofer, C. (, January 21–24). Trackformer: Multi-object tracking with transformers. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), New Orleans, LA, USA.
45. Ramesh, A., Pavlov, M., Goh, G., Gray, S., Voss, C., Radford, A., Chen, M., and Sutskever, I. (2021). Zero-shot text-to-image generation. arXiv.
46. Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., and Gelly, S. (2021, January 4–8). An image is worth 16 × 16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), Venna, Austria.
47. Touvron, H., Cord, M., Douze, M., Massa, F., Sablayrolles, A., and Jgou, H. (2021). Training data-efficient image transformers and distillation through attention. arXiv.
48. Yuan, L., Chen, Y., Wang, T., Yu, W., Shi, Y., Jiang, Z., Tay, F., Feng, J., and Yan, S. (2021). Tokens-to-token vit: Training vision transformers from scratch on imagenet. arXiv.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00060 ↗
49. Wang, W., Xie, E., Li, X., Fan, D., Song, K., Liang, D., Lu, T., Luo, P., and Shao, L. (2021, January 10–17). Pyramid vision transformer: A versatile backbone for dense prediction without convolutions. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00061 ↗
50. PVTv2: Improved baselines with pyramid vision transformer10.1007/s41095-022-0274-8 ↗
51. Han, K., Xiao, A., Wu, E., Guo, J., Xu, C., and Wang, Y. (2021). Transformer in transformer. arXiv.
52. Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., and Guo, B. (2021, January 10–17). Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Montreal, QC, Canada.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00986 ↗
53. The effectiveness of the finite differences method on physical and medical images based on a heat diffusion equation10.1088/1742-6596/1999/1/012080 ↗
54. The analytic of image processing smoothing spaces using wavelet10.1088/1742-6596/1879/2/022118 ↗
55. Most apparent distortion: Full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy
56. Image database TID2013: Peculiarities, results and perspectives10.1016/j.image.2014.10.009 ↗
57. No-reference blur assessment of digital pictures based on multifeature classifiers10.1109/TIP.2010.2053549 ↗
58. Massive online crowdsourced study of subjective and objective picture quality10.1109/TIP.2015.2500021 ↗
59. Koniq-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessment10.1109/TIP.2020.2967829 ↗
60. Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y ↗
61. Blind image quality assessment: From natural scene statistics to perceptual quality10.1109/TIP.2011.2147325 ↗
62. Uncertainty-aware blind image quality assessment in the laboratory and wild10.1109/TIP.2021.3061932 ↗
63. A novel rank learning based no-reference image quality assessment method10.1109/TMM.2021.3114551 ↗
64. VCRNet: Visual compensation restoration network for no-reference image quality assessment10.1109/TIP.2022.3144892 ↗
65. PCANet: A simple deep learning baseline for image classification10.1109/TIP.2015.2475625 ↗
66. MDFNet: An unsupervised lightweight network for ear print recognition