Radiomics Approach to the Detection of Prostate Cancer Using Multiparametric MRI: A Validation Study Using Prostate-Cancer-Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms
Source abstract
Abstract
Over the last few years, a number of studies have quantified the role of radiomics, dynamic contrast enhancement and standard MRI (T2WI + DWI) in detecting prostate cancer; however, the aim of this paper was to assess the advantage of combining radiomics with other multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) (T2-DWI-DCE) in improving the detection of prostate cancer. This study used 10 prostate-cancer-tissue-mimicking phantoms to obtain preclinical data. We then focused on 46 patients who underwent mpMRI and Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy between September 2016 and December 2017. The texture analysis parameters combined with the mpMRI and compared with the histopathology of TRUS biopsy have been assessed statistically by principal component analysis (PCA) and discriminant component analysis (DCA). The prediction model and goodness-of-fit were examined with the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and McFadden pseudo-R-squared. In the PCA, there was a higher separation between cancerous and noncancerous tissue in the preclinical compared with the clinical data. Both AIC and R2 showed an improvement in the model in cancer prediction by adding the radiomics to mpMRI. The discriminant analysis showed an accuracy of cancer prediction of 81% compared with 100% in the pre-clinical phantom data. Combining radiomics with mpMRI showed an improvement in prostate cancer prediction. The ex vivo experiments validated the findings of this study.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment · Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Science and Engineering, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK
Department of Statistics, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia
Department of Clinical Radiology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK
Division of Imaging Sciences and Technology, School of Medicine, Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. LncRNA PVT1 Predicts Prognosis and Regulates Tumor Growth in Prostate Cancer10.1080/09168451.2017.1387048 ↗
2. MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis10.1056/NEJMoa1910038 ↗
3. Use of Prostate Systematic and Targeted Biopsy on the Basis of Multiparametric MRI in Biopsy-Naive Patients (MRI-FIRST): A Prospective, Multicentre, Paired Diagnostic Study10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30569-2 ↗
4. Perfusion and Vascular Permeability: Basic Concepts and Measurement in DCE-CT and DCE-MRI10.1016/j.diii.2013.10.010 ↗
5. Overview of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Management10.2214/AJR.12.8510 ↗
6. Role of PI-RADS Version 2 for Prediction of Upgrading in Biopsy-Proven Prostate Cancer With10.1016/j.clgc.2018.02.015 ↗
7. Chung, A.G., Member, S., Shafiee, M.J., Member, S., and Kumar, D. (2015). Discovery Radiomics for Multi-Parametric MRI Prostate Cancer Detection. arXiv.
8. Haralick Texture Analysis of Prostate MRI: Utility for Differentiating Non-Cancerous Prostate from Prostate Cancer and Differentiating Prostate Cancers with Different Gleason Scores10.1007/s00330-015-3701-8 ↗
9. Improving Tumour Heterogeneity MRI Assessment with Histograms10.1038/bjc.2014.512 ↗
10. Incoronato, M., Aiello, M., Infante, T., Cavaliere, C., Grimaldi, A.M., Mirabelli, P., Monti, S., and Salvatore, M. (2017). Radiogenomic Analysis of Oncological Data: A Technical Survey. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 18.10.3390/ijms18040805 ↗
11. Hellerbach, A., Schuster, V., Jansen, A., and Sommer, J. (2013). MRI Phantoms—Are There Alternatives to Agar?. PLoS ONE, 8.10.1371/journal.pone.0070343 ↗
12. Multi—Parametric T 2 * Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting Using Variable Echo Times10.1002/nbm.3951 ↗
13. Tissue Mimicking Materials for the Detection of Prostate Cancer Using Shear Wave Elastography: A Validation Study10.1118/1.4773315 ↗
14. Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Steering Committee: PI-RADS v2 Status Update and Future Directions10.1016/j.eururo.2018.05.035 ↗
15. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Imaging Techniques: CT and MRI10.1259/bjr/55166688 ↗
16. Principal Component Analysis10.1002/wics.101 ↗
17. Jombart, T., Devillard, S., and Balloux, F. (2010). Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components: A New Method for the Analysis of Genetically Structured Populations. BMC Genet., 11.10.1186/1471-2156-11-94 ↗
18. Discriminant Component Analysis via Distance Correlation Maximization10.1016/j.patcog.2019.107052 ↗
19. A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705 ↗
20. McFadden, D. (1977). R2.Pdf, Yale University. [474th ed.].
21. Validation of PI-RADS v. 2 for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis with MRI at 3T Using10.1002/jmri.25284 ↗
22. Prostate Cancer Differentiation and Aggressiveness: Assessment with a Radiomic-Based Model vs. PI-RADS v210.1002/jmri.26243 ↗
23. DCE MRI of Prostate Cancer10.1007/s00261-015-0589-3 ↗
24. Bologna, M., Corino, V.D.A., and Mainardi, L.T. (2019, January 23–27). Assessment of the Effect of Intensity Standardization on the Reliability of T1-Weighted MRI Radiomic Features: Experiment on a Virtual Phantom. Proceedings of the 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Berlin, Germany.10.1109/EMBC.2019.8857825 ↗
25. Radiomics Feature Reliability Assessed by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient: A Systematic Review10.21037/qims-21-86 ↗
26. Association between Pathology and Texture Features of Multi Parametric MRI of the Prostate Association between Pathology and Texture Features of Multi Parametric MRI of the Prostate10.1088/1361-6560/aa884d ↗
27. Prediction of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness with a Combination of Radiomics and Machine Learning-Based Analysis of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI10.1016/j.crad.2019.07.011 ↗