Can Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) Be Used to Predict Pig’s Meat Quality In Vivo?
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of the current study was to evaluate the possibility of application of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) in order to estimate pork quality. The BIA measurements were tested on 18 living animals for the prediction of the meat quality. The absolute resultant electrical resistance (Rz) and reactance (Xc) of the body was measured with a set of disposable surface electrodes at the frequency of 50 kHz and the current intensity of 400 µA. The characteristics of meat quality, pH measured 1 h and 24 h after slaughter, meat color parameters represented in CIE L*a*b* system, glycolytic potential, intramuscular fat, and natural drip loss, were assessed on the samples of the Longissimus dorsi (LD) muscle. The slaughter value of pigs was characterized on the basis of hot carcass weight (HCW) and percent of meat in carcass. The results showed a significant Pearson correlation between bioelectrical impedance parameter Rz and pH1 (r = 0.48*, p < 0.05). A significant Spearman correlation was showed between color b* value and the Rz/Xc/HCW ratio (r = −0.62*, p < 0.05) and Xc (r = −0.51*, p < 0.05), as well as between the Rz/Xc ratio with pH1 (r = 0.48*, p < 0.05). The multivariate statistical method (principal component analysis and cluster analysis) showed that bioimpedance measurements combined with meat quality traits make it possible to distinguish groups with different quality parameters. However, the relationships between them are complex and still require analysis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Body Composition Measurement Techniques · Meat and Animal Product Quality · Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Human Nutrition Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159 C Str., 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
Department of Experimetal Design and Bioinformatics, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
Choice Genetics (Pen Ar Lan), 64-100 Leszno, Poland
Funding
Polish Ministry of Science · Higher Education within funds of Faculty of Human Nutrition and Consumer Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS)
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Berri, C., Picard, B., Lebret, B., Andueza, D., Lefèvre, F., Le Bihan-Duval, E., Beauclercq, S., Chartrin, P., Vautier, A., and Legrand, I. (2019). Predicting the quality of meat: Myth or reality?. Foods, 8.10.3390/foods8100436 ↗
2. Gagaoua, M., Duffy, G., Alvarez, C., Burgess, C.M., Hamill, R., Crofton, E., Botinestean, C., Ferragina, A., Cafferky, J., and Mullen, A.M. (2022). Current research and emerging tools to improve fresh red meat quality. Ir. J. Agric. Food Res., 1–23.10.15212/ijafr-2020-0141 ↗
3. Przybylski, W., and Hopkins, D. (2016). Breeding strategies for improving meat quality. Meat Quality Genetic and Environmental Factors, Taylor & Francis Group.10.1201/b19250 ↗
4. Trends in meat science and technology: The future looks bright, but the journey will be long10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.06.023 ↗
5. Prediction of meat quality traits in the abattoir using portable near-infrared spectrometers: Heritability of predicted traits and genetic correlations with laboratory-measured traits10.1186/s40104-021-00555-5 ↗
6. A Review on Meat Quality Evaluation Methods Based on Non-Destructive Computer Vision and Artificial Intelligence Technologies10.5851/kosfa.2021.e25 ↗
7. Electronic noses: Powerful tools in meat quality assessment10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.04.240 ↗
8. Applications of emerging imaging techniques for meat quality and safety detection and evaluation: A review10.1080/10408398.2014.954282 ↗
9. Ultrasound and meat quality: A review10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.09.016 ↗
10. Narsaiah, K., Biswas, A.K., and Mandal, P.K. (2020). Nondestructive methods for carcass and meat quality evaluation. Meat Quality Analysis, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-819233-7.00003-3 ↗
11. Use of Infrared Thermography in Determining Meat Quality
12. Evaluation of fresh meat quality by Hyperspectral Imaging (HSI), Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): A review10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108340 ↗
13. Emerging nondestructive techniques for the quality and safety evaluation of pork and beef: Recent advances, challenges, and future perspectives10.1016/j.afres.2022.100147 ↗
14. Bioelectrical impedance analysis. Part I: Review of principles and methods10.1016/j.clnu.2004.06.004 ↗
15. Housing conditions influence the survival and body composition of ageing rats10.1016/S0531-5565(00)00174-1 ↗
16. Use of bioimpedance spectroscopy to estimate body water distribution in rats fed high dietary sulfur amino acids10.1093/jn/131.4.1302 ↗
17. Predicting the chemical composition of the body and the carcass of hair sheep using body parts and carcass measurements10.1016/j.animal.2020.100139 ↗
18. Use of BIA method for the estimation of beef carcass composition–weight of longissimus lumborum muscle, ratio of muscle tissue and fat in loin crosssection
19. Evaluation of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of extracellular and total body water in healthy cats10.1093/jn/132.6.1757S ↗
20. Use of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis for estimation of total body water and extracellular and intracellular fluid volumes in horses10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.320 ↗
21. Mechanisms of water-holding capacity of meat: The role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.04.022 ↗
22. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) in animal production10.22319/rmcp.v12i2.5821 ↗
23. Meat quality assessment using biophysical methods related to meat structure10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.039 ↗
24. Infrared technology in animal production10.1079/WPS20010004 ↗
25. Applications of NMR in meat science10.1016/S0066-4103(04)53003-X ↗
26. Ultrasonic Assessment of Meat Quality Traits in Pigs10.3103/S1068367413010199 ↗
27. Pork of low technological quality with a normal rate of muscle pH fall in the immediate post-mortem period: The case of the Hampshire breed10.1016/S0309-1740(85)80004-8 ↗
28. The application of biosensors for drip loss analysis and glycolytic potential evaluation10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.02.025 ↗
29. (2013). Meat and Meat Products–Determination of Three Fat Content (Standard No. PN-ISO 1444:2000).
30. Relationships between longissimus glycolytic potential and swine growth performance, carcass traits, and pork quality10.2527/2003.8192206x ↗
31. Glycolytic potential in semimembranosus muscle of Italian Large White pigs10.1111/j.1745-4573.2009.00155.x ↗
32. Prediction of fat-free mass of pigs from 50 to 130 kilograms live weight10.2527/1999.774893x ↗
33. Predicting live and carcass lean using bioelectrical impedance technology in pigs10.1016/S0301-6226(98)00199-7 ↗
34. Prediction of body composition of Iberian pigs by means bioelectrical impedance10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.05.026 ↗
35. Beyond standard PSE testing: An exploratory study of bioimpedance as a maker for ham defects10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108980 ↗
36. Deligeersang. Variations and mutual relationships of bio-impedance value, pH value and water loss rate of bovine muscles
37. Moisture content prediction of porcine meat by bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy10.1016/j.mcm.2012.12.020 ↗
38. A method for detection of chilled pork freshness using bioimpedance
39. Measurements of resistance and reactance in fish with the use of bioelectrical impedance analysis: Sources of error
40. Bertotti, F.S. (2010). Sistema de biotelemetria passiva e técnica de medição para aquisição da impedância elétrica de tecido animal post mortem. [Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná].
41. Afonso, J., Guedes, C., Santo, V., Morais, R., Silva, J., Teixeira, A., and Silva, S. (2020). Utilization of bioelectrical impedance to predict intramuscular fat and physicochemical traits of the beef Longissimus thoracis et Lumborum Muscle. Foods, 9.10.3390/foods9060836 ↗
42. Prediction of beef carcass salable yield and trimmable fat using bioelectrical impedance analysis10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.09.015 ↗
43. Augmented postmortem glycolysis does not occur early postmortem in AMPKγ 3-mutated porcine muscle of halothane positive pigs10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.02.015 ↗
44. Assessing the composition of the soft tissue in lamb carcasses with bioimpedance and accessory measures10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108192 ↗